🧵 Industry "standards"
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:25:55 UTC No. 929287
So why are people here pretending the industry is doing something great?
I see a lot of shitting on Blender because it doesn't live up to industry "standards" and then you go and look what the industry puts out and it's shit even uglier than the worst uglies in real life.
The idea that the people responsible for pic related are doing anything even remotely desirable and that their opinions should be taken seriously is laughable to me.
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:33:38 UTC No. 929288
go back to /pvol/ and play your videogames, child
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:00:01 UTC No. 929317
>videogames
That's your problem.
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 15:20:17 UTC No. 929320
>>929287
you are conflating art-style with technical skill level. on a purely technical level, the assets you have shown are hard to produce.
also if the industry switched its toolset by adopting blender, its globohomo agenda (purposely turning everything ugly) would still be the same. your thread doesn't really make any sense.
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:11:18 UTC No. 929343
>>929287
America only produces low-tier trash, because its inhabited by low-tier trash people. Find better inspiration - ie, anything outside Shartland.
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:49:01 UTC No. 929415
This meme of conflating sexiness with model quality is so utterly retarded.
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:08:09 UTC No. 929425
>>929330
indians unironically have no souls/consciousness (hylics), so wrong again.
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 13:23:15 UTC No. 929432
>>929415
>I can't make aesthetic models
>B-but the underlying sculpt is technically correct
Yeah no one gives a shit. That's like saying artist's poop in a can is good because it's well-sealed.
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:21:17 UTC No. 929442
>>929287
Whats the fucking deal with most modern western character artists being so fucking afraid of beauty? I'm not talking about something like "sexy/hot/erotic" but just something beautiful, aesthetically pleasing, easy on the eyes.
It feels like only easteners, indie devs or people focused on stylization can make aesthetically pleasing female and male characters, even when AAA devs spend hundreds if not thousand of man hours on haircards, facial deformation rigs, micro-normals and tons of tech, the faces are still fucking ugly, even if the hair,details and techniques are state of the art it makes the uncanny faces even worse
Most if not all of the left images were made by single people/small teams, and all on the right are from industry "pros" or featured in AAA games
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:07:56 UTC No. 929449
>>929442
All of those are soulless
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 20:09:05 UTC No. 929457
>>929449
show me your soul
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 20:54:31 UTC No. 929461
>>929458
good example
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 21:09:34 UTC No. 929463
>>929458
Also soulless
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Dec 2022 21:50:13 UTC No. 929466
>>929313
>Have another one
no thanks
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:47:10 UTC No. 929491
>>929469
Absolutely awful. What an embarrassing example of western ineptitude.
Moose at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 03:13:58 UTC No. 929505
>>929460
The subtlety really rams you from behind in this one
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:50:39 UTC No. 929515
>>929491
Have another. While others grind through Sakaki's videos, be they without audio or auto translate, to see the original workflows for anime character creation from Japan itself, mutts just freestyle ugliness. No understanding of character design whatsoever.
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:06:01 UTC No. 929548
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:58:46 UTC No. 929559
>>929287
I agree OP. They have access to tech that could produce amazing visuals beyond anyone's imagination in the 70s/80s/90s and yet for SciFi movies these days it seems bland brutalism is the order of the day.
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 23:09:13 UTC No. 929595
>>929469
Looks like if Dreamworks made the next DBZ movie.
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 23:12:05 UTC No. 929596
>>929515
to be fair this does not look half bad from this angle, but i assume that in any other view this will be shit
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:13:50 UTC No. 929610
>>929608
Beats having a nose like that
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:21:28 UTC No. 929612
>>929608
that "nose" looks like a zit
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:23:24 UTC No. 929613
>>929612
not him, but thats how you should do noses on anime characters in 3d. You dont want any nostril holes at all.
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:35:20 UTC No. 929614
The issue here is that porn has rotten your brain, your entire perception of the world is decided by what turns you on
games like horizon zero dawn and the last of us are graphical masterpieces, but you can't see past your coomer brain limits, all you see is politics and immediately assume something is bad because it's not a hypersexualized bimbo or loli
and while the japanese market exploits horny virgins loneliness by selling coomer shit, the western market is trying to do something more meaningful
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 01:51:43 UTC No. 929616
>>929614
At this point are you just begging for (you)s lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 05:11:33 UTC No. 929634
>>929425
Neither do art generator AIs, but they still put out pretty decent stuff.
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 05:25:12 UTC No. 929635
>>929614
The only porn-addled fetishists here are you people who think 0/10s are in any way normal.
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 06:49:06 UTC No. 929644
>>929595
Look down. Does DreamWorks makes shirts like that for non-background characters?
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Dec 2022 08:54:20 UTC No. 929648
>>929287
Blender is shit with heavy scene, rigging, etc. I want to like it but its not useable because of this, also my freelance jobs are based on studios with pipelines in houdini, maya, etc.
The software isn't responsible for the art and shit taste though.
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Dec 2022 08:24:38 UTC No. 929885
>>929460
Oh yeah, I remember the fuckwad who made this say how ashamed he was of sexualizing women in the past.
Underage trannies must be a-ok by this standards I suppose.
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:56:43 UTC No. 929928
>>929287
some people are ugly. We're going to need them in our games in order to make the beautiful characters look more attractive. A model isn't "bad" because it faithfully executes an ugly design.
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Dec 2022 18:58:49 UTC No. 929930
>>929442
attractive women make women mad. So if there's a woman in your design team meeting and they see an attractive character design she'll get mad and rationalize some excuse why the design needs to be changed. If you resist you'll get fired for misogyny.
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:14:45 UTC No. 929932
>>929928
I mean, I get that, but why make all the black women ugly as sin and with loathsome personalities? To make every other race on Earth seem pretty and likeable?
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Dec 2022 22:21:06 UTC No. 929951
>>929287
left one below the first two pics is basedjak material
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:52:59 UTC No. 930021
>>929928
No.
We never did before and the characters looked a million times better.
And hardly anyone is that ugly in real life.
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Dec 2022 18:52:13 UTC No. 930030
>>929425
i am aware of that and that is exactly why indians are the preferred goyim of this century
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Dec 2022 18:55:18 UTC No. 930031
>>929930
eastern women do not have this problem
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 01:38:25 UTC No. 930066
>>929320
No he doesn't.
>>929289
This is well executed, but just an ugly face.
>>929287
>>929313
This is some uncanny valley MakeHuman tier garbage that an Indian of Fiverr would be embarrassed to send out.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 01:43:50 UTC No. 930067
>>929287
The Control chick's nasolabial area has been liquified and that's actually a pretty spot-on rendition of Debra Wilson's likeness.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 01:46:38 UTC No. 930068
>>929442
Soul is still missing a decent ass on that dude on the bottom. Why are 3D artists afraid of a man with some junk in his trunk?
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 02:47:50 UTC No. 930069
>>930068
attractive men make men mad. So if there's a man in your design team meeting and they see an attractive character design he'll get mad and rationalize some excuse why the design needs to be changed. If you resist you'll get fired for misogyny.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 03:05:53 UTC No. 930070
>>930069
can you imagine being this asshurt over a 4chan post? I can't
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 03:09:48 UTC No. 930071
>>930070
what
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Dec 2022 09:14:58 UTC No. 930095
>>930070
bro I think that was a joke
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 00:23:50 UTC No. 932095
>>929614
EVERY PAINTING HUMANITY HAS EVER PAINTED AND PUT IN A GALLERY PROVES YOU OTHERWISE
*inhales*
FAGGOT
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 05:53:12 UTC No. 932129
>>932095
thank you so much for bumping a spam thread (OP is the hardcore autist that terrorizes this board by being responsible for a significant portion of the threads) that had been dead for 3 weeks.
your opinion is extremely important. you are an amazing human being and everyone wants to be around you.
Anonymous at Thu, 5 Jan 2023 04:16:30 UTC No. 932221
>>932129
Which long house inhabitant are you?
Anonymous at Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:08:24 UTC No. 932242
>>932221
all of them.
Anonymous at Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:33:33 UTC No. 932329
>>932129
>significant amount of posts
>2 threads total
Anonymous at Fri, 6 Jan 2023 03:33:58 UTC No. 932401
>>929289
On the right looks like actor Will Poulter.
They're wanting everyone not to look good, women like men, men like women, everything upside down from what's real and good.