🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:31:00 UTC No. 1002517
Dear Blender users and devs,
Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces with supporting edge loops is not a alternative to chamfered edges. Not all smooth corners are the same. You "bevel" tool shits the bed on just about anything more complicated than your default cube. Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object. This is not a way to live, and you should feel shameful.
Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 20:42:27 UTC No. 1002518
* cums on your face *
Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:03:04 UTC No. 1002565
>>1002517
ok. take a look at the source and see if you can make it work like you want. good luck and thank you for your contribution, anon
Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:11:14 UTC No. 1002566
>>1002517
> Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object.
True
Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:22:48 UTC No. 1002580
sounds like a skill issue
Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:30:35 UTC No. 1002582
>>1002580
Also true, for example booleans sometimes don't work because of wrong normal directions or holes in geometry. Not so often applicable but when there is a lot going on in the extruded mesh, try generating convex hull and boolean that instead. Or sometimes it makes sense to separate parts of the mesh and convex hull them individually, when global convex hull is not applicable.
Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:02:30 UTC No. 1002589
>>1002517
>Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best, even for simple object.
its always cracks me up zbrush booleans are perfect since they a just a visual trick, yet when you accept and they get calculated they work well
i blender im afraid to press button so it dosnt crash
Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:18:58 UTC No. 1002605
>>1002517
>Your Booleans only work 70% of the time at best
that being generous, you have that boomer Howard_Trickey working on it so we will have to wait at least till 2026, any shit more advanced like soft booleans like Houdini does is out of the scope.
https://projects.blender.org/blende
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:03:01 UTC No. 1002770
>>1002565
This but unironically.
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:09:03 UTC No. 1002771
>>1002605
I mean, at least someone is working on it, most of that CompSci shit flies over my head
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:41:15 UTC No. 1002773
>>1002771
>at least someone is working on it
He just worte the design he is not even working on the Boolean Fast Mode Refactor, it is done by a guy with leukemia, Germano Cavalcante, so we maybe don't get that neither.
https://projects.blender.org/blende
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Dec 2024 19:39:08 UTC No. 1003164
>>1002517
>>1002589
Werks 4 me. Keep your closed-source kikeware to yourself thank you very much.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:39:10 UTC No. 1003180
>>1002565
anyone with the skill to fix blender's many problems doubtless has an income high enough that they can just use professional tools rather than waste their life on hobbyware
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:51:04 UTC No. 1003181
>>1002773
I hope things get better. I've been using blender for 3 years and every year things are getting better.