🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:56:45 UTC No. 16593460
These three graphs are the most important graphs in the world right now. If you understand what they imply, you know everything is about to change.
Scale is all you need.
2027-2028.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:49:32 UTC No. 16593162
Is their a drug therapy that can turn you asexual and aromantic?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:47:44 UTC No. 16593150
Is their a drug therapy that can turn you asexual and aromatic?
🧵 Puzzle 4 (2 in one, Difficulty 2/7 for both )
John Puzzle at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:15:15 UTC No. 16593002
Instructions:
In each puzzle, 2 panels are missing.
You must select 2 of these panels—in the correct order—to complete the pattern. ( 46 is different from 64)
It is possible for the same panel to appear twice (e.g., “11,” “22,” etc.).
None of the puzzle require external resources. You do not need any special knowledge to solve these items. None of the patterns are cultural.
Lastly, you need to provide both the answer choice and the explanation. Feel free to use drawing tools to aid with your explanation. I encourage it so that it is clear to everyone what you are saying.
Previous post:
>>16592161
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:22:19 UTC No. 16592808
Scientifically, how do I cure my depression?
🧵 Fossilised microbes found inside meteorite
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:04:15 UTC No. 16592787
NASA and Russian Scientists confirmed ET microorganism fossils present on a meteor Attached find a link to the PDF research paper on Research Gate.
https://www.researchgate.net/public
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:06:42 UTC No. 16592720
https://educationaltechnology.net/k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolb%
🧵 1 Teraton Thermonuclear Blast
SGO at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:46:09 UTC No. 16592683
I have looked into the science a bit and I understand that around 2 thirds of all the energy released in almost any event is lost through mainly heat and particles/waves released, but with modern technology and a better understanding quantum physics compared to decades ago, could it be possible to generate a 1,000,000,000,000 tons of tnt blast without making a thermonuclear warhead for example the size size of a giant cargo ship? Perhaps it is possible to do something to split, melt, or change subatomic particles to release far more energy than atomic fission or fusion?
🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:37:36 UTC No. 16592530
Why did humans evolve to be puny with huge BHCs, while gorillas are at least as big as an elite strongman, stronger are more ripped but with literal 1 inch microdicks?
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:15:28 UTC No. 16592338
I wasted a bunch of time and money getting an IT degree. I was in an IT job for 6 months and hated it.
Now I want a real STEM degree, but I don't want more debt.
Is there a way to study/acquire a STEM degree without becoming 30k+ in debt?
For IT certs you can just study and then pay for exam attempts.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:19:10 UTC No. 16592247
What is the equation of the curve? It passes through the points (9, 0), (10, –1) and (11, 0).
🧵 puzzle 3. Difficulty 3/7
John Puzzle at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 04:58:44 UTC No. 16592161
Instructions:
In each puzzle, 2 panels are missing.
You must select 2 of these panels—in the correct order—to complete the pattern. ( 46 is different from 64)
It is possible for the same panel to appear twice (e.g., “11,” “22,” etc.).
None of the puzzle require external resources. You do not need any special knowledge to solve these items. None of the patterns are cultural.
Lastly, you need to provide both the answer choice and the explanation. Feel free to use drawing tools to aid with your explanation. I encourage it so that it is clear to everyone what you are saying.
Previous post:
>>16591260
🧵 Volume of Solid of Revolution Conceptual Issue
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 03:17:18 UTC No. 16592113
For the area enclosed by the curves y=0, y=8, and y=x^(3/2) we can find a solid of revolution using the shell method with the expected volume being equal to 192pi cubic units. When we integrate in terms of y with the integrand as 2pi y(y^(2/3)dy with upper limit y=8 and lower limit y=0 we find the correct volume. When we integrate with the integrand 2pi x(8-x^3/2)dx with upper limit x=4 and lower limit x=0 we find a value that is off from the correct volume by a multiplication exactly equal to (volume found)(7/2). What is a general method to arrive at the scaling factor for any solid of revolution problem so we may choose to integrate with respect to either variable and find the correct volume?
It may be helpful to notice that when only finding the area under the curve for the integral y=0 to y=8 (y^2/3)dy area found is equal to area found by the integral x=0 to x=4 (8-x^3/2).
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:57:45 UTC No. 16592102
You mean tell me that these bones are this well perserves after 66 million years? Who tf believes in this shit. KEKKKKK
🧵 I'm shutting the door or ya work for the result
Drunk scizoposter at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 02:44:04 UTC No. 16592087
I'm drunk.
Now that I have taken control of the whole world your either doing my psionics with 3d graphics packs for software on objective reality for powers in conventions (it's in our genes it's not actually software) - or I'm stitching it up so no one can know it incase someone tries a trick and ya never get any of it!
And btw reels on FB are great I saw an AI turn a hot cross buns into bears and with mine we learn what everything can turn into and we do it with quantum hallucinations.
And don't think I can't stitch it up because I'd be to stupid I know more than yas
And I don't have to it's upto me but the ships sailing brothas
I'm immortality she would suck the chops off and I have better robots yes I have very expensive robots and I have mars rivers at my house but you can't see them lol it's a hallucination haha stitch 1 that is and it's a threat
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:40:54 UTC No. 16592049
/sci/ - useless information that doesn't help you get laid
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:07:44 UTC No. 16592023
>some of the largest celestial bodies in the universe will be BLACK holes
>some of the smallest celestial bodies in the universe will be yt dwarves
what did the universe mean by this?
🧵 High school math questions around the world
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Feb 2025 01:02:59 UTC No. 16592016
Mine is a Korean one.
(If you require, I'll add a solution)
🗑️ 🧵 Are mirrors made out of witch craft?
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:32:15 UTC No. 16591957
How the FUCK can they see you if you hold up a towel over your face
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:28:39 UTC No. 16591953
> Chinese Brain Neural Interfaces developed in secret to control
>Schizoid coin fag leaks info
Is this feasible??? Are the Chinese this advanced??? I know a top U.S. research scientist in this field was sending his research directly to China. What is the current known possibilities of BCI's and there potential future?
this seems like a world ending technology...
🧵 Your Brain on Nicotine
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:15:27 UTC No. 16591828
Is nicotine beneficial to the brain?
🧵 The Shirley Temple Paradox
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:41:11 UTC No. 16591783
A week or so after that something started troubling me - I'm a bit of a cinephile and have my own personal movie review system - and yet, for the life of me, I found it nearly impossible to figure out which Shirley Temple movies stood above the others. The consistent quality of the movies was "good to pretty good" and making a ranked order of my favorites was very difficult.
This stood in sharp contrast to my list of all-time favorite movies, drawn from a much larger/diverse field with incredible competition for the top spots. Yet, ranking my top 5 favorite movies of all time seemed, somehow, easier than ranking this much smaller set of movies. To make sure I wasn't crazy, I messaged my old English/Film Literature teacher to get his opinion on the matter. Now, he admitted that it had been some 60 years since he has seen a Shirley Temple movie, so I changed the prompt to this - "Which is harder - Ranking your top 5 favorite Martin Scorsese movies, or your top 5 favorite movies of all-time?" After deliberation, he replied stating that it was harder for him to pick his Top 5 favorite Martin Scorsese movies "by a hair".
So, I come to you lot. Is there some sort of mathematical principle to this paradox that I don't know the name for? Why is it harder to a ranked sorting of a smaller set than it is for a larger set?
My initial hypothesis is that it is akin to a field of wheat, wherein spotting the tallest stalks is easier when looking at the entire field as opposed to looking at a smaller section of the field where all the stalks are of height so similar that it becomes harder to differentiate them.
But is there a name for this principle already? I guess that's my question.
🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:40:27 UTC No. 16591780
Can you use an electronic nose to determine human biological sex? As far as I know, dogs can do it by smelling odor.