🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:20:53 UTC No. 16636275
How are the Three Laws of Robotics compatible with robot femdom/BDSM?
For example if the three laws were established and I had a gynoid and I want her to be my dominatrix. I hope this is the right board to ask this.
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:28:12 UTC No. 16636286
>>16636275
State your version of the three laws and define your terms, or STFU.
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:38:51 UTC No. 16636302
>>16636275
Yes it works, onus is for anyone trying to deceive you to prove any contradictions
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:50:54 UTC No. 16636327
>>16636275
>A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
>A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
>A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
The laws are compatible with BDSM when we correct a possible misunderstanding about words like suffering, pain, injury, hurt, harm and so on. One suffers when there is action against the will. An action that leads to pain, injury, hurt, harm and so on is not necessarily against the will.
Strenuous exercise like running a marathon is painful and possibly leads to injury but is not against the will and therefore not suffering. However a problem remains: where to draw the line? Marathon example again: others than the ones running the marathon need to recognize the symptoms of medical danger and force a runner in such a danger against his/her will to quit.
Since we can't fully put our own (sometimes flawed) intuition that guides our judgement into a well-reasoned argument we can't teach AI how to judge correctly either.
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:22:13 UTC No. 16636365
>>16636327
Currently, the element of Contracts will not allow misinterpretation of 'harm' which means your post is a claim
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:35:52 UTC No. 16636380
>>16636365
How to judge whether or not "harm" is interpreted correctly?
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:47:15 UTC No. 16636393
>>16636380
Contracts motivate the world and have software equivalents, therefore if you accept technology in Nature, it has elemental status in at least two types of environmental affirmation. You mean to ask regarding this force of nature, else I certify naught reply.