Anonymous at Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:35:17 UTC No. 834523

This is not a real picture, it's a render.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:04:12 UTC No. 834529

>>834523
HOREE SHIEET!

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 03:17:20 UTC No. 834584

>>834522
So this is the power of Blender huh?

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:32:06 UTC No. 834620

I don't see where the impressive part is.

high quality photo references + photogrametry + non-real-time render + basic fibermesh hair

Any artist can sculpt like that given photogrametry data. But not every artist has access to hardware that's worth tens of thousands of dollars.

Not to mention the legal costs involved in recreating in 3D someone's likeness. There's a reason you see these types of renders only showing in-house staff. Can you imagine how much money you would have to pay just to recreate a digital double of George Clooney?

Unreal, owned by a company which is worth billions, couldn't even afford 50 rando's to scan and put in their MetaHuman app.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:05:26 UTC No. 834639

They ALWAYS fuck up the eyes. The eyes is what keeps 3D face renders to look 100%.
Even more pathetic, you can already see that many threw the towel and just use AI fed with millions of images that they then apply to their renders to finally get to 99.5% realism.
My guess is that in the future the idea of trying to manually achieve perfect 3D humans will get abandoned completely and shit will just get generated from AI using parameters the user defines before the AI slaps it together using all that data it got fed.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:06:45 UTC No. 834641

They ALWAYS fuck up the eyes. The eyes is what keeps 3D face renders from looking 100% real.
Even more pathetic, you can already see that many threw the towel and just use AI fed with millions of images that they then apply to their renders to finally get to 99.5% realism.
My guess is that in the future the idea of trying to manually achieve perfect 3D humans will get abandoned completely and shit will just get generated from AI using parameters the user defines before the AI slaps it together using all that data it got fed.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:09:49 UTC No. 834642

arnold is the only renderer that does scattering correctly.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:39:39 UTC No. 834651

>>834641
i think you're right. the images generated by thispersondoesnotexist.com are more convincing than ~99% of the photorealistic 3d face renders i've seen

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:38:19 UTC No. 834688

>>834522
looks 99.9% real, the only problem are the eys as usual

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 20:15:12 UTC No. 834708

>>834688
>eyes as usual
And TEETH.
Laziest way to show off your ~realism~ skills is making a bald dude who has his mouth and eyes closed with one main light source coming straight from the front. Lazy cruise control for impressing normies.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:28:44 UTC No. 834729

>>834708
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjHiC0mt4Ts
older and maybe not fair because Chris Jones is an industry veteran, but he also did it in a pre PBR renderer.
Now show your work for comparison.

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:30:03 UTC No. 834730

Then why did the artist made him so ugly?

Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:33:40 UTC No. 834731

>>834708
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjHiC0mt4Ts
older and maybe not fair because Chris Jones is an industry veteran, but he also did it in a pre PBR renderer. SubD base model, details sculpted in Sculptris, maps in Krita, keyframe animation and rendering in LW, compositing in Resolve

Now show your work for comparison.