1275x825

pkmgfdfg.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 834742

favorite 3D artist?

320x416

boing boing boing....webm

Anonymous No. 834745

>>834742
Rushzilla

Anonymous No. 834747

>>834745
good pick

521x600

1620126873365.jpg

Anonymous No. 834756

>>834745
the usual coomer trash

Anonymous No. 834786

>>834742
This looks like actual colored shit. Tangela especially looks bad

2000x1343

ashley-a-adams-mo....jpg

Anonymous No. 834801

a_cubed and manuel de jorge

Anonymous No. 834802

>>834742
Myself.

Anonymous No. 834810

none. degenerate art is a waste of time.

Anonymous No. 834830

>>834810
people like you are the reason why 4chan is shit

Anonymous No. 834832

>>834745
>>834801

Anonymous No. 834863

>>834810
he said 3d art not coom art, fucking retard

Anonymous No. 834933

>>834863
Doesn't matter, still all worthless shit. The only sensible application for 3D is CAD and Archviz.

540x720

1624342653428.jpg

Anonymous No. 835039

>>834745
Nice try, rushzilla.

Anonymous No. 835040

>>834745
he really inspires me desu
but idk his skill is kinda wasted on coomer stuff

Anonymous No. 835042

>>834742
the texture and lighting look so good and feels nostalgic on that
but honestly it doesnt take that much skill or effort to make anything in that image
still pretty pleasing to look at

Anonymous No. 835050

>>834745
Nice animation, idiot!

Anonymous No. 835059

>>835042
Texturing on these is hideous t b h.
Also smoothing errors here and there.
The overly noisy render is just the icing on the cake.

Anonymous No. 835062

>>835059
but it looks soulful and aesthetic...

250x250

eye-roll.jpg

Anonymous No. 835063

>>835062
Oh please...

960x960

70950456_11568230....jpg

Anonymous No. 835070

>>835040
>wasted
I really like his work but he should move to a more clasic pin-up models instead of that.

Anonymous No. 835073

>>835040
you're blinded by the coom because that's sub-commercial standard

Anonymous No. 835074

>>835073
"commercial standard" shit is always too generic and disgusting imo

Anonymous No. 835473

>>834745
lol wtf is that animation

1616x750

nikita_veprikov.png

Anonymous No. 835614

Nikita Veprikov without a doubt

Anonymous No. 835628

>>835614
>looks like a female
>has balls
what did he mean by this

Anonymous No. 835644

>>835628
How did you get female from this, I see a bald muscular man.

447x663

photodune-skinny-....jpg

Anonymous No. 835649

>>835644
>muscular

Anonymous No. 835661

>>834742
Your mom.. she made you, a worthless piece of shit, that posts on /3 idiotic threads.

Anonymous No. 835689

>>835614
kinda looks like he added detail to on of those character base meshes used by wanna be animators

Anonymous No. 835705

>>834801
Manuel De Jorge is incredibly based; a beautiful synthesis of coom AND art; truly an affirmation of life

Anonymous No. 835707

>>835628
>male flamenco on the right
>female with cock 'n balls on the left doing the swooping swan stance

Anonymous No. 835762

Everything here so far has been trash.