1275x825
pkmgfdfg.jpg
320x416
boing boing boing....webm
Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:20:33 UTC No. 834745
>>834742
Rushzilla
Anonymous at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:29:57 UTC No. 834747
>>834745
good pick
521x600
1620126873365.jpg
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:02:36 UTC No. 834756
>>834745
the usual coomer trash
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:59:23 UTC No. 834786
>>834742
This looks like actual colored shit. Tangela especially looks bad
2000x1343
ashley-a-adams-mo....jpg
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:31:18 UTC No. 834801
a_cubed and manuel de jorge
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:32:56 UTC No. 834802
>>834742
Myself.
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:48:27 UTC No. 834810
none. degenerate art is a waste of time.
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:24:51 UTC No. 834830
>>834810
people like you are the reason why 4chan is shit
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:34:33 UTC No. 834832
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:40:15 UTC No. 834863
>>834810
he said 3d art not coom art, fucking retard
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 23:28:22 UTC No. 834933
>>834863
Doesn't matter, still all worthless shit. The only sensible application for 3D is CAD and Archviz.
540x720
1624342653428.jpg
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:07 UTC No. 835039
>>834745
Nice try, rushzilla.
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:07:43 UTC No. 835040
>>834745
he really inspires me desu
but idk his skill is kinda wasted on coomer stuff
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:09:47 UTC No. 835042
>>834742
the texture and lighting look so good and feels nostalgic on that
but honestly it doesnt take that much skill or effort to make anything in that image
still pretty pleasing to look at
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:52:38 UTC No. 835050
>>834745
Nice animation, idiot!
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:14:56 UTC No. 835059
>>835042
Texturing on these is hideous t b h.
Also smoothing errors here and there.
The overly noisy render is just the icing on the cake.
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:22:39 UTC No. 835062
>>835059
but it looks soulful and aesthetic...
250x250
eye-roll.jpg
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:33:28 UTC No. 835063
>>835062
Oh please...
960x960
70950456_11568230....jpg
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:39:04 UTC No. 835070
>>835040
>wasted
I really like his work but he should move to a more clasic pin-up models instead of that.
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:24:47 UTC No. 835073
>>835040
you're blinded by the coom because that's sub-commercial standard
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:26:57 UTC No. 835074
>>835073
"commercial standard" shit is always too generic and disgusting imo
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Jun 2021 14:08:28 UTC No. 835473
>>834745
lol wtf is that animation
1616x750
nikita_veprikov.png
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Jun 2021 16:31:24 UTC No. 835614
Nikita Veprikov without a doubt
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Jun 2021 18:47:08 UTC No. 835628
>>835614
>looks like a female
>has balls
what did he mean by this
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Jun 2021 21:26:00 UTC No. 835644
>>835628
How did you get female from this, I see a bald muscular man.
447x663
photodune-skinny-....jpg
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:21:34 UTC No. 835649
>>835644
>muscular
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:06:47 UTC No. 835661
>>834742
Your mom.. she made you, a worthless piece of shit, that posts on /3 idiotic threads.
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Jun 2021 06:14:04 UTC No. 835689
>>835614
kinda looks like he added detail to on of those character base meshes used by wanna be animators
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:56:56 UTC No. 835705
>>834801
Manuel De Jorge is incredibly based; a beautiful synthesis of coom AND art; truly an affirmation of life
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:58:37 UTC No. 835707
>>835628
>male flamenco on the right
>female with cock 'n balls on the left doing the swooping swan stance
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:59:47 UTC No. 835762
Everything here so far has been trash.