739x415

0E17364A-6267-489....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 837137

I fucking hate N-Gons

Anonymous No. 837138

They are called polygons.

480x360

1623910261306.jpg

Anonymous No. 837141

>>837137
I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS
I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS
I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS I HATE THE NGONS

1194x901

Untitled.jpg

Anonymous No. 837145

>>837137
nobody cares if the topology is bad, as long as it looks good.
If you modeling with sub surf and such you already thrown the optimization out the window

Anonymous No. 837146

Not my problem.

Anonymous No. 837147

>>837145
Hey I recognize that ball.

192x192

3344546803.jpg

Anonymous No. 837160

>>837145
>modeling with sub surf

750x922

B66443C6-1B14-4ED....jpg

Anonymous No. 837177

>>837137
>>837141

Anonymous No. 837179

>>837145
except the shading on that ball looks fucked and it cant be skinned well

Anonymous No. 837195

>>837137
Triangulate and dilate faggot.

215x322

1602017470688.jpg

Anonymous No. 837196

>>837179
No it isn't fgt. It's also easy to UV if you're not braindead. People like you have some pathological problems with topology. You are caught up in your narrow thinking, unable to serve simple problems. You are small brained users and consumers.

Stupid fucker.

215x322

1602017470688.jpg

Anonymous No. 837197

>>837179
It doesn't deform. And you are braindead. People like you have some pathological problems with topology. You are caught up in your narrow thinking, unable to serve simple problems. You are small brained users and consumers.

Anonymous No. 837198

>>837137
They don't matter anymore anon.
It's all triangles.
Let it go.

Anonymous No. 837213

>>837197
This. Unless you’re going to deform it, subdivide it, or you are being commissioned and they EXCLUSIVELY ask for quads, which is retarded, then you are better off using tris.

Anonymous No. 837222

>>837177
So will they ban violent and criminal groups like BLM and Antifa now?

Anonymous No. 837227

>>837197
you ignored the worse part of what i said, the glaring artifacts in the shading. it looks horrible

640x640

yt.jpg

D Anone No. 837242

>>837222

Anonymous No. 837243

>>837242
thank god yes

604x600

D-ziYf6XkAAFUox.png

Anonymous No. 837300

>>837242
why yes, how could you tell?