Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 05:31:51 UTC No. 837429

>>837427
>Iandgrenwilliam
cunt even named himself Ian too LOL

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 05:43:04 UTC No. 837434

>>837429
that's an L lmao

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 05:46:52 UTC No. 837436

>>837427
That's how it goes

>someone popularizes new technique / method
>everyone else copies it blindly
>community iterates on it
>it stops being fotm
>a handful of people iterate on it further and become masters
>a handful of people create new and interesting works

Whether it's impressionism, parkay floor, or bell bottom jeans that's just how it goes

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 05:46:54 UTC No. 837437

>>837434
its Ian Dgren Willian

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:38:07 UTC No. 837469

>>837436
>Ian Hubert
>new technique
Imagine being this new to CGI

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:48:52 UTC No. 837470

>>837427
This dude is 15 years old.
At least he is an competent Ian Hubert clone.
The other ones are all crap.

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:12:31 UTC No. 837474

>>837429
The absolute state of /3/ in 2021.

Ian at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:07:11 UTC No. 837481

>>837429
That’s the secret /3/. Be Ian

Anonymous at Wed, 7 Jul 2021 14:55:46 UTC No. 837487

Stop looking at instagram then it's literally the worst social media.

You will learn something on artstation and even twitter sometimes but you won't learn a damn thing looking at instagram.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 03:08:52 UTC No. 837589

>>837427
that render quality is atrocious, is this what Blendlets call quality?

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:53:08 UTC No. 837601

>>837470
i mean he has a lot of potential, this guy's a year younger than me and he can manage to do full blown renders that i couldn't even get close because i'd get bored and just abandon the project

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:15:23 UTC No. 837616

>>837469
Imagine being such a nigger you don't know what "popularize" means. Eat shit and die.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:14:03 UTC No. 837624

>/p/ hates instagram
>/m/ hates instagram
>/3/ hates instagram
Can 4chan be united under hating instagram

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:20:51 UTC No. 837625

>>837624
I like instagram but I only use it to look at cute korean girls

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:35:08 UTC No. 837626

>>837625
hell yea use that shit like pokedex, but isntead of collecting pokemons you collect hoes

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 10:19:05 UTC No. 837628

>>837601
>15 year old
>a year younger than me
underage b&?

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 10:56:20 UTC No. 837630

>>837624
i'm not even a psycho like I understand most popular social media but instagram is just fucking confusing all the content on it is like made by robots or something I can't imagine enjoying the experience.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:46:27 UTC No. 837634

>>>837601

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:11:38 UTC No. 837659

>>837589
Yeah, its not that great, but I would partly blame YouTube and the shitty compression. Doesn't help with the rain particles all over the screen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWau3kZA4UY
Using crappy photo-textures with low resolution and low amount of render samples with denoising does the rest.
Still better than what 75% of /3 is able to pull of.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:56:39 UTC No. 837684

>>837659
>>837427

Keep this shit off of /3/ please. No underage artists.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:14:49 UTC No. 837696

>>837684
one of the 75%?
Did I hurt you feelings?

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:06:48 UTC No. 837712

>>837696
Please no underage posters. Thank you.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:39:35 UTC No. 837723

>>837712
The guy who made that image is underage, but OP who posted it is probably not.
>Thank you.
Go fuck yourself.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 19:21:44 UTC No. 837730

>>837427
Dogshit quality photo textures probably all look like garbage close up. All covered in rain, haze and tons of post processing.
Technically I see nothing that wasn't manageable 15+ years ago in other 3D packages/renderers.

Anonymous at Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:15:04 UTC No. 839253

>>837487
This isn't true at all.

Anonymous at Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:24:20 UTC No. 839275

>>837730
I wonder if this method of using low res photo textures would work for any scene without rain and fog.

Anonymous at Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:49:12 UTC No. 839279

>>839253
show me

Anonymous at Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:51:36 UTC No. 839280

>>839275
https://youtu.be/LsGZ_2RuJ2A?t=412

the answer is sorta, it's not meant to hold up to properly modelling every object though it's meant to be super efficient for one person to do, which it very much is.

It's also not used for everything, just stuff it'd be efficient for, blend of full modelling, photoscanning and old school matte painting.

Anonymous at Sat, 17 Jul 2021 03:01:48 UTC No. 839404

>>837730
>Dogshit quality photo textures probably all look like garbage close up.

They aren't close up though so it doesn't matter.

Anonymous at Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:36:09 UTC No. 839448

>>839404
Still looks like shit