Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:17:06 UTC No. 837697

who?

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:28:07 UTC No. 837702

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ILERsIIwp0

>making a feature length furry film presumably for children

congratulations blender foundation

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:02:56 UTC No. 837710

>>837694
>your average blender user

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:14:17 UTC No. 837714

>>837702
Honestly pretty based

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:37:29 UTC No. 837718

>>837697
Russian Pixar

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:39:05 UTC No. 837719

>>837710
blender should have a tablet version but performance is shit on windows, just figure on Android

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:11:03 UTC No. 837756

>>837702
every goddamn time

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:20:58 UTC No. 837761

>>837756
They do that because it's instantly readable as male or female.

It's easy to make fun of, but I've yet to hear a serious argument against it that isn't just gender-communist tranny shit masquerading as art critique.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:38:08 UTC No. 837764

>>837761
Nah, it's just lazy. There are plenty of ways to create varied anthropomorphic characters. Hell, Nick from Zootopia looks more like the one on the left. The Disney eyes for female creatures is the only thing that's tough to get around sometimes.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 22:41:00 UTC No. 837765

>>837761
take meds

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:23:58 UTC No. 837776

>>837764
>There are plenty of ways to create varied anthropomorphic characters.

Never said there weren't. This one's just easy to execute.

>There are plenty of ways to create varied anthropomorphic characters. Hell, Nick from Zootopia looks more like the one on the left.

Zootopia has the luxury of using clothing to communicate gender, but
you might also notice that not only do we never see a female fox in Zootopia, we never a see a female of ANY canid species.

The most prominent example where we do see males and females of the same species side by side, is among the rabbits. ...And guess how disney differentiated them? Males get the fatter snouts.

>>837765
"Take your meds", he said, desperately swallowing another estradiol tablet. He seethed, and then, as he did every night, he began to dilate.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:30:05 UTC No. 837778

And just like that another thread becomes an argument for schizos about nothing to do with 3d

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:33:46 UTC No. 837779

>>837761
>>837776
Fuck off you autistic furry

>>837694
Apparently they did some Hansel & Gretel movie. Was it with Blender or did they recently switch to using.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:39:17 UTC No. 837782

>>837779
usually these studios have been using blender in pre-vis (like ubisoft animation) so it'd be interesting to see if they're actually using it on production stuff.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:40:19 UTC No. 837783

>>837776
>Never said there weren't.
Never implied you said it, faggot. I just said I thought it was lazy. I used one character as an example and even agreed with you on a part of the topic. You're partly preaching to the choir and partly defending stale character design because "trannies" or some psychotic shit.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:41:58 UTC No. 837785

>>837761
>It's easy to make fun of, but I've yet to hear a serious argument against it that isn't just gender-communist tranny shit masquerading as art critique.
By bringing it up in an irrelevant conversation, you're even worse than they are.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:44:20 UTC No. 837786

>>837782
I'm confused as to why there would be a preference to use it just for previs instead of just using your primary modeling package. They could cut out an extra step altogther if they use their package for both previs and production. Unless they have plugins specific to Blender.

Anonymous at Thu, 8 Jul 2021 23:57:23 UTC No. 837788

>>837786
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/blender-and-the-rabbids/

because in the case of ubisoft animation they didn't produce the final product, they were just the team that worked with the director to get the pre-vis done before it was outsourced.

As to why you'd want to use other programs and not blender on larger productions, come on man don't be silly you know why.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 01:25:50 UTC No. 837796

>>837785
I'm not the one who brought it up, faggot.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:48:15 UTC No. 837834

>>837756
kek
>>837761
ok , we will leave you to jack off to lola bunny in private

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 09:38:06 UTC No. 837838

>>837702
Why are you so negative? It look pretty good.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:07:43 UTC No. 837844

>>837838

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 11:19:13 UTC No. 837851

>>837761
Imagine being an autistic coomer furfag and defending this, lol.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 17:42:50 UTC No. 837877

>>837851
>>837834
>defending an obvious character design trick means you're a furfag

Ok trooner

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 21:28:57 UTC No. 837903

>>837877
I can't feel insulted because I have no idea what that means.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 21:54:41 UTC No. 837908

>>837710
Blender should be restricted to Android, a match made in UI hell.

Anonymous at Fri, 9 Jul 2021 23:12:38 UTC No. 837919

>>837877
i am a furfag too but your points suck

Anonymous at Sat, 10 Jul 2021 01:44:26 UTC No. 837956

>>837796
>brings up his personal feelings regarding gender shit in a thread about a furry Russian film company
>"YOU GUYS STARTED IT"
Someone made a joke about furry characters looking the same. You took it seriously and went off the deep end. Go outside, get some fresh air. None of this matters.

>>837694
What do I need to do to become a platinum diamond member of the Blender Foundation?

Anonymous at Sat, 10 Jul 2021 03:57:45 UTC No. 837974

>>837956
>You took it seriously

gosh, wouldn't want to discuss character design in a board about 3D graphics.

Anonymous at Sat, 10 Jul 2021 04:05:36 UTC No. 837976

>>837974
good now leave