Anonymous at Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:24:16 UTC No. 840612

>disable antialiasing
>render at 640x480

not that hard

Anonymous at Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:10:33 UTC No. 840629

What the other anon said. If you want to make the graphics look extra shitty, you'll need to add dithering though.

Anonymous at Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:46:41 UTC No. 840687

>>840609
turn off mipmaps (actually makes your sprites look crisp). set your rez low. make your characters in segments as volume preservation in limb bending was difficult. maybe limit colors.

Anonymous at Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:00:28 UTC No. 840698

>>840612
>640x480
320x240

Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jul 2021 06:40:55 UTC No. 840874

how do you fake the distortion from the technical problems ps1 had?

Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:28:17 UTC No. 840906

inb4 hidden anon

Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:56:41 UTC No. 840922

>>840874
Depends what you're faking it in.
There are easily googlable shaders to do it in unity, unreal and godot, but doing it in 3D packages like blender and maya seems to be more limited.

The best way to to vertex snapping is with a shrinkwrap modifier and a bunch of intersecting planes.

Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:24:57 UTC No. 840925

FUCKING GOOGLE IT RETARD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVtry7CKr-U&ab_channel=innovational_dummy

Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jul 2021 21:08:40 UTC No. 840959

>>840874
>>840922

If you mean the jittering vertices, you can get a similar effect in Maya by moving your character rig very far from the 0 point of the scene. Once it's far enough, the vertex positions will begin to glitch out. It does require the object to be skinned to a bone, if I remember right. Not sure if you can do the same in Blender.

If you have a very large scene, this can cause issues when you don't want the effect, but you can work around it, by moving the entire scene between shots, so the current point of interest is always close to the origin.

Anonymous at Mon, 26 Jul 2021 01:29:40 UTC No. 840995

>>840959
In blender I use two objects that are arrays of planes to correspond to the x and y screen space of every every pixel the camera can render, and have the scene snap to the nearest surface of each.

Anonymous at Mon, 26 Jul 2021 04:31:43 UTC No. 841012

>>840609
Remember to use tiny texture sizes.
Keep the total area of the UV map for a character to 256px x 256px.

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 03:22:24 UTC No. 841160

>>840959
Oh right, floating point errors. Of course.

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 08:41:52 UTC No. 841185

>>840874
theres a godot shader for that, atleast

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:53:34 UTC No. 841194

>>841185
I don't know godot, sorry. It seems pretty cool though

Anonymous at Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:08:45 UTC No. 842009

>>840874
based on >>840959 's idea and with a little testing, if you can fit your entire scene (or just the rendered part) between 8388608 and 16777216 on x, y, z, (origin at 12582912 xyz) you'll get the shimmering vertices like the ps1. you'll have to scale the scene up as well by maybe 4, maybe 100, maybe 1000, whatever you're doing so that it's actually able to move between integers.

i tested this in blender with something abstract i made a while ago. parent absolutely everything to an Empty, and move that to XYZ 12582912, scale it up or maybe down as necessary so your verts don't all round to the new origin, adjust the viewport near and far clipping plane so you can see what you're doing, as well as for the camera, maybe also focal length

Anonymous at Sat, 31 Jul 2021 23:04:51 UTC No. 842020

>>840609u suffer

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Aug 2021 00:05:28 UTC No. 842036

>>842009
this is just silly

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Aug 2021 00:11:07 UTC No. 842038

>>842036
works tho

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Aug 2021 01:55:33 UTC No. 843138

>>840609
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvnkWNW8x6c
Ask teamfourstar, internet personalities aren't as busy as people think they are

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Aug 2021 12:21:11 UTC No. 843174

>>840612
>>840609

Retard. You have to turn your vector positions into integers instead of floats too.

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Aug 2021 23:03:25 UTC No. 843255

These graphics are a product of the technology of their time.

Also: can't you even analyze and deconstruct what you see before you?!

Anonymous at Tue, 10 Aug 2021 01:13:50 UTC No. 843427

>>842036
Nothing that gets your goal in the end result is too silly