400x225

tumblr_ndxoqr6x3x....gif

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 845136

looking for that tool milt kahl or classical animation used to, place legs and hands, body parts frame by frame(also knowing how many frames to use for a scene) to do a walk cycle, or walking to(like pic) and slowing down correctly? basing on the mass, gravity, perspective?

idk

a real tiger? seems confusing

how do you place the charts?

Anonymous No. 845236

>>845136
Jesus cris, you still haven't done a single walk cycle yet?
It's been actual months.

Anonymous No. 845291

>>845236
maybe i have but i dont wanna waste time talking with you about it with measly little tips that doesnt work

why dont you just help look for me what milt kahl used since you got so much knowledge for your... "commentary"

Anonymous No. 846226

just rotoscope.

Anonymous No. 846241

>>846226
This. Classical animation is rotoscoping and just brute force trial and error til you get your timing and spacing down.
With Computer Graphics you have your graphview to help spot issues but it's still a lot of hard won experience to know what to look for.

Honestly Op you are not cut out for this as you've asked the same questions for at least half a year now.
Do your self a favor and move on to something more within your ability, you only have one life and right now you are wasting
what precious time you have here struggling with things you'll never understand.

Anonymous No. 846345

>>846241
not like your brute force may actually produce anything sufficient.
maybe you are not cut out for this

Anonymous No. 846346

>>846241
do yourself a favor and speak within the range of my thread. otherwise just kys and do us all a favour

it s not like you ve got a brain to immaterialize enough intelligence to speak with me on equal level, cretin.

Anonymous No. 846347

>>846241
rather than throwing all these worthless low tier insults and brainless dumb commentary that wastes time, you could ve actually project something smarter and actually useful for my time that i ve wasted to write on this measly websites and its worthless population that is you

but instead you simply added unimportant stupid shit that a five year old can come up with despite having the brain of a middle aged hobo, which doesnt seem to make you any wiser in the end

Anonymous No. 846348

bah im leaving this idiots

Anonymous No. 846355

>>846345
>>846346
>>846347
>>846348
If you are so smart, why are you making such stupid questions?

Anonymous No. 846421

>>846355
Leave him be, you provoke him like that he's just gonna lash out and start spamming again.
It doesn't matter if he leaves thinking we're all retards, what matters is he moves on.

It's better for /3/ and better for Op if he can break this cursed existence of remaking the same thread over and over and over again.

400x248

jungle book.gif

Anonymous No. 846438

>>845136
The tool? Being a talented draftsman. I know that the concept of artistry is probably lost on /3/, but it's still frustrating to see. This was at a time when soulless 3d garbage didn't even exist yet, and if you wanted to make a cartoon you had to be able to draw. Unfortunately, those times are over now.

Anonymous No. 846450

>>846438
Not at all lost on /3/ anon. First time Op made this thread he got some amazing answers.
But Op isn't looking for the truth how this is achieved, by training oneself to being a really attuned instrument
and pour numerous hours perfecting something that last a few brief seconds on screen.

People here outlined the process of how to create physically correct animations that can mix with motioncapture by hand.
But turns out the Op isn't looking for that but rather for some sort of 'future tech AI' that analyze a few frames and correctly animates all the inbetweens for you.
You know ,that one secret program we all use without telling anyone that automatically capture your intent and simulates all the physics and trajectories realistically.
Op is better off giving up and wait another 20 years til such a thing might actually exist.

As is even computer animation is grueling work with a steep learning curve even for people with innate talent for the task, much like learning to play an instrument well.
The Op has severe issues with understanding even the basics of the temporal and is a very ill fit for ever achieving the sort of mastery involved in advanced animation topics.

Anonymous No. 846582

>>846355
because you are too stupid for anything complicated?

>>846421
yeah faggot. pls leave.

>>846438
a smart one actually. i was thinking /3/ would know more or care but theyre practically on cocaine 24/7 to even give a fucking read.

>>846450
see? more TLDR faggots who keeps on and on this bullshit. your future AI is gonna be shit by practicing countless hour on your nonsense and unreliable materials.

>long winding self rubbing
go on. let everyone here listens how much you rub your trash ego. you just dont read and should just kys right now and save everyone a goddamn place rather than being fuking familiar with a stranger like me. anything that you train seems like theyre gonna be a fucking idiot anyway, maybe you should give up and go to reddit or spmething than infecting 4chan with your cancerous brain damage which seems to decay your cognitive and keeps your fucking mind on a goddamn loop because you feel you are so fucking smart and everyone is a motoorized AI serving your self service "i smart u dumb tldr" programming schedule

well sorry, im not so fucking smart to bite the bullet again and so sorry you dont seem be ready for any sort of troubleshooting let alone actually knowing what the fuck is going on

Anonymous No. 846583

>>846450
>amazing answers
probably like this garbage lol but anon just really wanna let everyone know how smart they are in their detective work but honestly doesnt give any fucking shit about the issue at hands and fails to take it any serious about the work because it's just "animation"

yes everyone gets it. yer so smart you dont even need to know any shit to get it right... heck you dont even need to read your stupid ass ball lickingommentary to be right, it s like all the same bullshit you say will come out goo anyway what a worthless occupant of 4chan. why not neck yourself really hard and let someone else occupy your space. it ll work out all the same whatever you do

fucking incel

Anonymous No. 846585

>>846450
if you actually knows AI why not actually say something AI ish than your garbage detective4chan larp material? something logical at once than your cretin quality self rubbing commentary and worthless doxxing?

be actually smart at once and than being pseudo intellectual when all you do is actually just baiting since you have no other good material to share anyway

mostly because you just prayed 5 times and feel so good about your own fucking dillema i guess

what a waste of space. jannies love you so much your brain basically fries into an omellette.


this thread is 50 years to early for you. if you are a fuking genius, then keep your mouth shuts than blabbering like an idiot

kys

Anonymous No. 846586

>>846355
i dont know. why do you come if you are actually intelligent? no one likes you in /3/?

Anonymous No. 846588

>>846421
yes, you certain help this all. i couldnt understand how self righteous you could feel after wasting so much goddamn time showing how intelligent you are tan addressing the issue.

if this is all so fucking trivial for you, why not fuck off and neck yourself or something?

Anonymous No. 846590

losing braincell everytime i read these anons feeling so smart and intelligent.

they practically just got kicked out of the door for being a complete retard by CHOICE

Anonymous No. 846595

>>845136
This thread is now about kino feline animations

https://youtu.be/L7a8hmoOsx0

Anonymous No. 846603

>>846595
hot but not hot enough

Anonymous No. 846604

Cris, you're not going to get better if you keep posting here

Anonymous No. 846605

maybe stop replying to his threads, lads

Anonymous No. 846607

>>846604
maybe i did. it's called research and socializing, botcel. but that wont help if you are being completely illiterate by choice
trust me, it s not completely useless here with the exception of u, cretin.

>>846605
yes. starting with you

Anonymous No. 846722

>>846607
sneed