900x500
1608594779533.jpg
๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 12:15:59 UTC No. 854838
pill me on fractal rendering
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 12:35:16 UTC No. 854841
It's just mathfags being mathfags
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 13:19:21 UTC No. 854847
>>854838
Dumb because you don't render the full fractal. It just becomes a weird shape.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:16:37 UTC No. 854852
>>854847
>Dumb because you don't render the full fractal.
>don't render the full fractal.
>the full fractal.
...
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:22:18 UTC No. 854853
haha mathematics go swiiiiiiirrrrrllllll
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:24:58 UTC No. 854854
>>854852
Yes. It's like when you first learn about fractals. The concept is cool but it could never exist visually, so all those pics of that turtle fractal thing are dumb and only should serve as kind of a visual aid. "Fractal Rendering" can't exist because it doesn't render a fractal, just a weird shape that resembles one.
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:28:57 UTC No. 854855
>>854838
It's not impressive because it's easy
637x358
steamuserimages-a....jpg
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:03:59 UTC No. 854861
>mfw 2:50
https://vimeo.com/215581282
i had no idea you could do that with 3d fractals
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:24:36 UTC No. 854866
>I'm too stupid and lazy to use my head
>DURR HURR
kys
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:26:04 UTC No. 854868
>>854861
Useless nerd shit for dorks.
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 11:13:55 UTC No. 855036
>>854838
There's like very old software that generates this shit. Like from 2002 or something
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:01:22 UTC No. 855044
https://www.mandelbulb.com/
Also, kinda related.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFi
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 15:00:08 UTC No. 855068
>>855036
There are tons of fractal generators in development
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:14:12 UTC No. 855530
Thread related
https://archive.wakarimasen.moe/3/t
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:31:56 UTC No. 855533
>>854847
Then are circles also dumb since you don't render a circle, just a polygon?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:02:49 UTC No. 855536
>>855533
Yes
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:08:01 UTC No. 855537
>>855536
it seems that you're the dumb one, my guy. after all, I don't see the entire you, just dumb posts you make
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:54:28 UTC No. 855821
>>855533
Other guy wasn't me. Circles aren't stupid because in real life, I can make one and use it. I'm never going to need a fractal in the same way I would need a circle, so they are in different realms. It's like pi. I'll never get the full number, but even the approximations have use. Your dumb "Gotcha!" lacks basic understanding of geometry and its real world applications.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:07:04 UTC No. 857466
>>855821
Just because one is more useful than the other doesn't mean that the approximation of the less useful one is completely useless.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:07:20 UTC No. 858078
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 22:35:57 UTC No. 858109
>>858078
>a thread died for this
thanks for the bump, retard