Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 16:14:03 UTC No. 857015

looks like Houdini dumbed down for children

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:45:13 UTC No. 857027

I have no idea what this video is supposed to be demonstrating and I cannot be bothered to look at the paper

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:48:58 UTC No. 857029

>>855080
>>papers
good for you

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Oct 2021 04:31:09 UTC No. 857103

>>855080
>NO TRAINED ARTIST IS REQUIRED TO CHANGE PARAMETERS GUYS WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE
>how would these parameters come to be?
>uh oh um well they just would why are you not AMAZED
lol

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:23:40 UTC No. 857107

>>857103
AI, you dumb fuck.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Oct 2021 03:21:20 UTC No. 857230

>>857107
Except that someone had to model and expose the parameters.
This is like saying using Skyrim's character creation makes you a 3d modeller.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:10:25 UTC No. 857804

>>855080
looks heavily programmed for something honestly abit mediocre

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 04:44:09 UTC No. 857959

>>857230
No one cares about "being a 3D modeler" if they can get the same end result with sliders, and once a model is trained it is infinitely reusable. Cope, modelcel.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 05:55:35 UTC No. 857970

>>857959
what's wrong dazfag? can't swim without your sliders?

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:37:18 UTC No. 857980

>>857959
You really didn't get the point, did you retard?
You can't get an end result with sliders until someone actually makes those sliders.
We're not at the point where an AI is making those things, and the paper itself relies on an artist to create the model and expose the sliders for someone to fuck around with. That's not what's being discussed.

So again, "3D modeling" it's not. It's already been modeled, you're just fucking around with sliders like you would any character creator.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:10:38 UTC No. 857982

>>855080
>how to model a toaster
>start with a fully modeled toaster
holy fuck hahahahgahahha!!!!!

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 07:40:06 UTC No. 857983

this looks like substance models

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:29:22 UTC No. 858005

>>857980
>once trained
>infinitely reusable
Dumb darkie.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Oct 2021 21:49:16 UTC No. 858093

>>858005
>once trained
It's not trained yet. They're not training one. It's not part of the paper, and it's not what was being presented in the video. AI isn't even discussed in that way in it.
No shit if an AI did it you'd be able to do all that, but that AI ain't here yet.
So the whole point of "this is 3d modelling" is ridiculous because someone already had to model it. A dude modeled a toaster, and exposed some sliders for people to play around with. An AI didn't generate it, and they didn't write an AI to generate it. Will one exist somewhere down in the future? Sure. Is it the point of the paper and video? Not a chance.

Now explain to me how "3d Modeling This Toaster Just Became Easier!", when someone already did all the work of modeling it.