Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 21:36:51 UTC No. 855146

>>855136
Nightmare fuel dolls in the background

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 21:54:21 UTC No. 855149

you need to take your dad to a hospital, anon.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Oct 2021 22:45:42 UTC No. 855160

>>855136
Mess around with the feature detectors, it changes the result a lot

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 00:03:34 UTC No. 855165

>>855136
I hope he shook his head and called you gay.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 04:12:31 UTC No. 855201

>>855136
>3d through photogrammetry
you're doing it wrong. Should ideally be a plain background.

The reason why its so incomplete is because not enough pics + Not proper lighting

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:18:52 UTC No. 855262

>>855136
Is porcelain figures are like anime cum figures, but for old boomers?

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:21:10 UTC No. 855263

>>855136
you choose the shittiest software

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:51:03 UTC No. 855265

You need GREAT lighting and a lot of photos.
Then some luck.
I'd imagine trying to photo slightly moving object is a no no.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:50:04 UTC No. 855282

You need a rig with synchronized cameras and lighting. Pic related is the workable minimum.
Or you simply rent time on a professional rig.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:27:04 UTC No. 855292

Hey anon is that Sharp 19" TV?

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:29:48 UTC No. 855294

>>855282
>Pic related is the workable minimum.
We have a retard in the thread.
workable minimum. is an iphone 3d scan app

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:42:16 UTC No. 855297

>>855294
Enjoy your unusable melted garbage, hobbyist.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:59:06 UTC No. 855305

>>855297
>hobbyist as an insult
we got a real big shot industry pro here

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:23:37 UTC No. 855315

>>855305
You get what you pay for, halfwit
Either build your own rig or rent time on one

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:56:05 UTC No. 855380

>>855263
what do you recommend?

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Oct 2021 21:57:42 UTC No. 855382

>>855380
3ds Max

Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 03:18:06 UTC No. 855433

>>855382
how does it import from pics?

Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 04:16:02 UTC No. 855439

I want to recreate my mom
But I lacked the foresight to get a panning video around her while she was alive
I thought I had way more time, she wasn't even that old

Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:31:55 UTC No. 855488

>>855136
dude ur dad looks fuckin bubbly as fuck

Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:39:34 UTC No. 855535

>>855297
>hobbyist as an insult

Yeah this guy is basically everything wrong with this board.

Anonymous at Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:24:10 UTC No. 855539

>>855136
looks latino

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 03:03:11 UTC No. 855592

you could look into DECA or similar systems (https://github.com/YadiraF/DECA)

basically use a few photos with DECA, grab the produced OBJs, average them, then transfer good topo over the averaged shape (with ZWrap or similar)

pic related is an experiment with it. I can't share the photos but the DECA output is reasonably close. of course a likeness sculptor, even a beginner one, could do it better. but for something that's automated, and requires only a few pictures, it's pretty good. it doesn't do textures that well, though

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:15:45 UTC No. 855624

>>855282
lol you bastard made me laugh

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:40:48 UTC No. 855631

>>855282

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:54:13 UTC No. 855633

>>855535
Butthurt 3rd worlder detected

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:45:35 UTC No. 855651

>>855633
Wouldn't having the time to be a hobbyist be considered a luxury?

This nigga retarded!

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:07:14 UTC No. 855664

>>855146
underrated comment

>>855282
when things like this are not available, photos with the phone are better

In order to get better results at photogrammetry, you need to consider the following:

>Photographs taken from equally distributed angles, and also different distances
You did that, nice

>Avoid reflective surfaces
You did that, your dad doesn't glow in the dark (like CIA agents)

>Get good lighting environment
That's where it's harder for you. Doing photogrammetry inside a room can change the lighting a lot. Since there are little light sources (windows and lightbulb), depending where you are when taking a picture, your shadow can be casted on the objective, thing that affects the outcome. Also, the presence of reflective objects (like your TV screen) can affect the lightning.

Tips:
Do the same thing outside
Be sure that the focus of your camera has always the same settings (some cameras blur automatically for some reason, so you gotta change that on your settings)

Video related is my brother in 3D:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44Ey9UFqQPI&ab_channel=Acampandoconfrikis
t. Land Surveyor. (we work quite often with photogrammetry)

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:09:19 UTC No. 855684

>>855651
Dis nigga poor af