800x450

displacement.1.png

๐Ÿงต Keyshot is better than cycles

Anonymous No. 855640

Am I wrong? Just tried this shit, and glass renders looks 100 time better and more vibrant and realistic than Cycles's plastic glass.

Anonymous No. 855738

>>855640
Keyshot isnt open source and it isnt Free, dum dum

Anonymous No. 855740

>>855738
>isnt Free
just bought it from torrents

Anonymous No. 855744

>>855738
being free has nothing to do with being good

Anonymous No. 855757

>>855738
JESUS TITTY FUCKING CHRIST...what kind of stupid answer is that?
Whether it is open source and free or not has nothing at all to do with what the OP was talking about.
And then you dare to call people dum dum...look in the mirror you absolute shit for brain.
>>855640
Entirely possible, I've never used it. With Cycles's plastic glass you mean the glass shader?
In order to get the maximum quality out of Cycles you have to build your own glass shader instead of using the standard one - its possible to get a better result out of it, but the fact that there isn't something better available as standard is valid criticism.
The principle shader is also not really great if you compare it with implementations into other renderers like Arnold, Renderman, Octane...
Cycles is overhyped by Blenderfanboys, the quality you can get out of it without building you own shaders is pretty mediocre and in certain aspects of inferior quality compared to the competition.

Anonymous No. 855760

>>855744
>freedom isn't good
ok retard

Anonymous No. 855769

>>855757
https://youtu.be/Sv2wqwsvx-8
indeed

can't complain for that asking price though

Anonymous No. 855771

>>855769
thanks for that tutorial
>>855760
feeling clever for playing semantic games?
You look rather dumb for not getting the meaning of his words or deliberately misunderstanding them.