Anonymous at Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:23:09 UTC No. 856372

>>856371
Here is what I modeled I will texture it tomorrow.
What do you think ?

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:17:04 UTC No. 856398

>>856371
FOSSed and Librepilled

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:39:33 UTC No. 856452

>>856371
Absolutely based

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:40:34 UTC No. 856455

>>856372
i think you should use your fucking eyes and realize that looks nothing like what you posted in the op. fix the beak and feet at least

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:37:56 UTC No. 856959

>>856371
>>856372
>>856452
First draft is here rate it.
>>856455
Sorry I have an artistic license for this.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 13:10:45 UTC No. 856994

>>856959
hey OP can you explain something to me? If you use a perfectly spherical body (or close to it), does it cost like billions of triangles? Or is it cheap since a sphere is a primitive shape?

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:40:06 UTC No. 857008

>>856371
wow.. so this is the power of free software

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Oct 2021 06:47:36 UTC No. 857119

>>856994
>hey OP can you explain something to me?
Sure.
>If you use a perfectly spherical body (or close to it), does it cost like billions of triangles
It actually uses quads
> Or is it cheap since a sphere is a primitive shape?
This is not how 3D with polygons works, the closest thing to explain this to you is that polygons can not do anything else then straight lines so the sphere needs to be made out of more and more straight lines, think of it like trying to make a circle out of straight lines in 2D.
>does it cost like billions of triangles
If you are asking about polycount yes it is big (quads are made out of 2 triangles.)

Have a look.
The model uses exactly
987988 Triangles.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Oct 2021 06:48:55 UTC No. 857120

>>857008
>wow.. so this is the power of free software
The joke is on you I'm OP and I made this >>856959 only in blender.

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Oct 2021 19:02:40 UTC No. 859207

>>856452