Anonymous at Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:39:52 UTC No. 858865

>>22 man years FOR THAT
NGMI. I could do that in 22 minutes.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:44:55 UTC No. 858867

>>858864
Not enough freedom at shaping it and it’s only mathematically perfect- displaying the surfaces still requires them to be converted to polygons, so the gpu gets equally fucked as with any dense mesh.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:01:25 UTC No. 858872

>>858867
this

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:36:21 UTC No. 858878

>>858864
>Why don't artists do soft-body modeling in NURBS anymore?

Because NURMS exist and does everything you want with comparative ease. If you've ever modeled something substantial with NURBS you wouldn't have any nostalgia for them.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:40:10 UTC No. 858879

>>858864
NURBS modelling is big boy big brain stuff that >10% of 3d artists understand

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:59:47 UTC No. 859026

>>858878
>If you've ever modeled something substantial with NURBS you wouldn't have any nostalgia for them
Wrong kiddo.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Nov 2021 03:53:10 UTC No. 859913

>>858864
Because using NURBS is shit and completely pointless nowdays, specially for modeling

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:39:16 UTC No. 859958

>22 man years
what a stupid ass marketing babble

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Nov 2021 23:53:13 UTC No. 859990

>>859958
>marketing babble

Do you seriously not understand the concept of man-hours?

It's not a marketing concept.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Nov 2021 00:44:18 UTC No. 859995

>>859913
You have no idea kiddo

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Nov 2021 02:06:24 UTC No. 860136

>>858878
what is NURMS?
Also based thread 90s CG was SOUL