720x405

161136491679.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 859683

Best photorealistic render engine for blender?

I will try to use maya if there's no such thing for blender, but I would love if there was an elite photoreal renderer that didnt need complex setup and was just press render to get photoreal elite industry renders.

Anonymous No. 859684

>>859683
Try marmoset 4, cute dog

Anonymous No. 859685

>>859684
I wanna still reuse my blender skills, but I wanna see first if there's some elite third party render addon engine I can use before switching.

640x607

1635169157371.png

Anonymous No. 859687

>>859685
Marmoset is the thingy people use at my work for their portfolio renders. But if you want to stick with blender stick with it i just hope you don't do your textures in it.

Anonymous No. 859688

>>859687
No, I need some photoreal renders for maybe eventually making some basic animation or just illustrations.

Anonymous No. 859689

>>859683
there is no 'magic photorealistic button' for any render engine. you can get great photorealistic results with any big-name render engine, cycles included, but you need to put in the work yourself. maybe the closest thing there is to a 'magic photorealism button' is corona render (citing this video https://youtu.be/myg-VbapLno?t=544 ) but its very slow (also according to that video) and you still need to put in the work to get good results

471x388

1578859531473.jpg

Anonymous No. 859690

>>859689
How do I get top tier elite results with cycles?

Anonymous No. 859691

>>859690
take some classes. practice. get good

Anonymous No. 859692

>>859691
any recomendation on a course?

535x315

iu-2.jpg

Anonymous No. 859694

>>859692
no because I am retarded hobbyist who's too busy to take his own advice, but I'm sure you can find some good stuff on google. what are you trying to render? beyond modeling, good texturing and lighting are also very important. try finding stuff about those things. it doesn't need to be specific to cycles either. you can apply generic texturing and lighting principles to any rendering engine

Anonymous No. 859695

>>859694
I want to make a few photoreal renders, as a challenge to improve my 3D skills.

Anonymous No. 859696

>>859695
Of what? Are you modeling them from scratch? Are you using premade assets?

Maybe try replicating an existing render, seeing where you're lacking in skill, and improving in each area you're not great at till you can reliably recreate good renders

Anonymous No. 859697

>>859696
the goal is to make them from scratch.
Again, is more a learning project to improve my skills.

Anonymous No. 859701

>>859683
use renderman for blender

Anonymous No. 859714

>>859701
>elite photoreal renderer that didnt need complex setup and was just press render to get photoreal elite industry renders.
Renderman is not idiot-proof as OP is clearly an idiot, judging by his demands and inability to write properly.

Anonymous No. 859723

>>859683
You are nowhere near skilled enough for your choice of render engine to be the limiting factor in how realistic your renders are. Just use cycles.

Anonymous No. 859955

PRMan and Arnold renderer if you want to be industry elite fag.

Mitsuba renderer if you want to be academic elite fag.