Anonymous at Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:55:51 UTC No. 862581

>>862570
ayy lmao

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:11:05 UTC No. 862595

>>862570
I'd fuck

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Nov 2021 04:05:57 UTC No. 862608

>>862570
not too often i immediately recognize what someone is looking for from an extremely vague description, but id be willing to bet my life that this is the image you're looking for

its striking and unforgettable

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:16:52 UTC No. 862738

>>862608
that one is also good and also very similar to the image I'm looking for, but its not that one my friend, thank you anyway

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:52:14 UTC No. 862750

>>862608
>submitted on 09 February 2006

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:06:39 UTC No. 862751

>>862750
Everything has been done already.
This is what industry professionals were capable of. CGSociety was a great place to connect with and learn from some of the best in that profession. Not so much anymore.

Zbrush was long established for this kind of work by 2006. I remember getting release 1.0 in late 2000 and while limited by today's standards it was already capable of pushing my own work to new levels.
I still have that 1.23 on one of my old machines. That one actually saw quite some use in commercial projects.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 05:24:08 UTC No. 862838

>>862750
>>862608

Wow. This is actually really, really good for something made in 2006.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:28:42 UTC No. 862876

>>862838
Spotted the hobbyist.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:51:40 UTC No. 862934

>>862876
It does look really good for something made in 2006. I don't care if you "work in the industry", stick it up your ass.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:34:34 UTC No. 862938

>>862876
most 2006-era films, games, and other productions utilizing 3d art are objectively way the fuck uglier than this alien duder.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 18:01:47 UTC No. 862959

>>862751
People used early Zbrush to make abstract metallic toothpaste pictures, not for sculpting

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 20:14:39 UTC No. 862995

>>862938
>>862934
Spotted the hobbyist
VFX for feature films in 2006 was already beyond that, dumbass kiddies and hobbyists.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 20:51:26 UTC No. 863002

>>862995
you're an idiot...this is one guy probably in one afternoon vs a whole fx department. Get real..

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:08:56 UTC No. 863018

>>863002
The lady doth protest too much, methinks