1325x856

1633479702616.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 864513

The new version is out. Why didn't they just make it a plugin instead? I mean, seriously?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX4A-3aJrwk

Anonymous No. 864514

>>864513
Its was an in-house tool for animation. Why would they make it a plugin for another tool like Maya if it replaces it?
So they can pay license fees for Maya?
Also did you seriously made a new thread for an update, or so that you can bitch and moan about it?

Anonymous No. 864515

>>864514
renderman was in house, and now its a plugin for blender, houdini, maya, etc. Not an excuse

>Also did you seriously made a new thread for an update, or so that you can bitch and moan about it?

grow up

Anonymous No. 864545

>>864515
Wait, Renderman for Blender? I missed that.

Anonymous No. 864547

>>864545
it doesnt work on the latest version though

Anonymous No. 864550

>>864545
>>864547
The last version it supports is 2.92 due to Blender upgrading Python from 3.7.4 (Blender 2.81) to 3.9.1 in 2.93.

Anonymous No. 864552

>>864547
>>864550
OK, I am not doing much on the rendering department but having more render engines is always a good thing.

Anonymous No. 864562

>>864513
ngmi so OP will COMPLAIN instead

Anonymous No. 864667

>>864515
Renderman is a renderer you dumb fuck. A renderer without a host program is basically useless.
>not an excuse
They don't need to justify/excuse their decisions. Deal with it!
>grow up
no, never

128x105

1622507830515.jpg

Anonymous No. 864671

>>864667
>Renderman is a renderer you dumb fuck. A renderer without a host program is basically useless.
are you fucking retarded? Anyone who actually knows renderman knows how to compose and fully utilize raw .rib! Fuck off kid!

201x251

images.jpg

Anonymous No. 864693

>>864667
>A renderer without a host program is basically useless
Get a load of this non-industry fag

Anonymous No. 864765

>retards argue about anything but not the topic of OP
shut the fuck up.

I wanna know if cascadeur is good or not.

Anonymous No. 864782

>>864765
more like cashcadeur. Someone really needs to write an open source alternative

Anonymous No. 864859

>>864782
Yes we definitely need more half assed open sores garbage shitting up this industry with more low skill pajeets

Anonymous No. 864860

>>864859
what we dont need is more closed source monopolies

Anonymous No. 864862

>>864782
I agree. Someone (not me) should definitely make it. Reverse engineering the algorithms looks hard but I can make the logo!