Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:36:49 UTC No. 875610

They arent even using displacement maps

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:44:43 UTC No. 875612

>>875607
this looks like ass

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:24:31 UTC No. 875634

can't tell if it's just a shitty demo of if godot's GI is actually that bad.

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:30:49 UTC No. 875878

It would be even better if they had used a filmic tonemapper.

Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:35:36 UTC No. 875880

>>875607
it's still probably better than the trash, or probably non existent stuff you "create"

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jan 2022 12:48:06 UTC No. 875983

>>875607
i could make something better in blender eevee.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jan 2022 22:41:49 UTC No. 876078

very noice

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jan 2022 02:00:36 UTC No. 876147

>>875880
does that make it good? why are you retarded?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jan 2022 21:45:54 UTC No. 876309

>>875607
looks like shit tee bee aych

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jan 2022 04:07:20 UTC No. 876377

>>875983
No you can't.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jan 2022 05:28:08 UTC No. 876407

FXAA fucking Christ

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:59:20 UTC No. 876439

>>875607
>everything blurry
Wow it even simulates needing glasses.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:50:24 UTC No. 876444

>>875983
And how fast would it render?

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:37:03 UTC No. 876776

It would look better without the perfect dark 64 character in the middle of the room.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 22:38:46 UTC No. 876784

>>875880
OP didn't even say anything about it.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:14:52 UTC No. 876872

>>876776
it's all very obviously arch-vis models. you can't expect a godot user to make good looking assets themselves you know!