Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:43:23 UTC No. 878269

>>878232
The guy in the video is not trying to be a dick but the channel makes more from showing what other people do than the artist does for making art. He can include a link of the artists name but 1% of people actually go to the artist's profile. People blow their load for the people that share but not for the people creating the actual art.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 04:16:15 UTC No. 878326

>>878269
He's just using it as visual aid for his educational video.
I think his videos are kind of mindless and don't give any real good advice but nonetheless, that's what he is doing.
I think it's incredibly petty to call out the guy for including images of the artwork.
I can understand the thumbnails and getting the artist's permission or even a commission fee, but when your art just appears a couple seconds while he is talking about something else, just seems like a pile on.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:04:55 UTC No. 878349

>>878326
if the mouse does it I don't hear you crying about it.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:38:25 UTC No. 878352

The original tweet literally says "Minimal credit"

You want to be a contrarian over discourse so hard that you're just ignoring the words in the original post in order to have something to complain about, go outside, and don't ever come back to this fucking board.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:42:37 UTC No. 878353

>you're NEVER going to make any money with your art
>and how to fix it
Do retards like these even read the titles they put on their videos?

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:48:25 UTC No. 878354

>>878353
I swear
>Use your art to show people who made it with your name for those interested to see me
>Complain on twitter

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:49:38 UTC No. 878355

>>878354
you have once again decided to not even read whatever you're replying to

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:06:53 UTC No. 878357

>>878354
meant to say " to see more"*
>>878355
?

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:00:28 UTC No. 878417

>>878232
>post your art on the internet
>people repost it
>"t-that's stealing!"
Are these the same people that shit on people that buy NFTs?

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:23:22 UTC No. 878430

>>878232

Stylized Station has a couple okay videos but they make "tutorial" videos sometimes and you watch them and they're literally just
>draw the rest of the owl

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:48:28 UTC No. 878441

>>878417
Posting your art to social media is stealing your creativity for nothing in return. Exposure only goes so far. Your worldview is going to lead to a really depressing future where only bigger companies will make what they think art is. really think about the tech platforms we have now and what they do the the state of art. Just because we are forced to use social media does not mean that the platform doesnt removes art's value.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:41:05 UTC No. 878924

>>878232
>nooooo dont take my art and that i post for free in the internet, even tho you put my name and url to my portfolio i am so pampered that i think it is a crime and you should be canceled from life.

imagine not knowing that art twitter is pure fucking leftist woke dhiarrea.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jan 2022 23:04:40 UTC No. 878935

>>878924
Sorry about your mental problems. Boomers were never supposed to be good with computers and now they get all their information from the internet that they dont know how to use. Get out of your bubble and see what people who are not like you are up to.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jan 2022 00:37:59 UTC No. 878944

>>878232
>10+ min of bloated and extened video made to maximize ad rev while giving crump of public advice that could be summed in 1 min
Who watches this garbage? Seriously.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jan 2022 07:15:39 UTC No. 878989

>>878232
>faggot artist could have used this guy as a platform to get some jobs
>cries for clout instead
This is why I never get mad when people start kitbashing the fuck out of some people's work or don't credit at all.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:24:27 UTC No. 879006

>>878232
i can't believe he'd show that guys art for 4 seconds as background filler in the 13 and half minute video. this is literally art theft, it's time to abolish fair use laws.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jan 2022 13:19:33 UTC No. 879014

>>878944
I know, right? Same with Arrimus3D
:D

Anonymous at Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:53:43 UTC No. 879171

>>878232
The hair on that model is pretty sweet... pretty, pretty sweet.

Anonymous at Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:48:03 UTC No. 879575

So, have you seen those hour-long scene breakdowns / tutorial videos they upload?

Apparently the artists that make those videos for stylized station don’t get paid, lol. That guy was always sketchy to me, but I still assumed all the artists that create the majority of content of his channel actually got paid at least something. Making such a long edited breakdown video require a stupidly high amount of work. This makes it even worse, there are huge threads on twitter about it.

You even have to pay like 50 bucks to HIM to get featured on his Instagram page, but if you refuse, they will sometimes still take and post your work there for free.

What a gigantic asshole. But I’m even more mad about dumbass artists who accept it, they surely knew they were working for free?

Anonymous at Fri, 4 Feb 2022 07:31:59 UTC No. 880039

>>879575
Much like jannies