Anonymous at Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:39:49 UTC No. 888731

>>888615
You are going to know at least the basic of 3d modeling for that

Anonymous at Sun, 27 Mar 2022 22:24:20 UTC No. 888785

>>888615
Almost all of the objects small enough to fit within a 3d scanner's volume are small enough for you to 3d model with little to no trouble. Aside from organic shit.

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Mar 2022 02:09:06 UTC No. 888805

>>888785
why would i do that when i could just scan

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Mar 2022 04:38:31 UTC No. 888828

>>888785
more like Almost all of the objects small enough to fit within a 3d scanner's volume are small enough for you to 3d scan with your phone with little to no trouble

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:18:35 UTC No. 888843

>>888805
Because the scans will come out like absolute trash and you'd have to re-make the object anyway.

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:21:32 UTC No. 888844

You will need to clean up and retopologize the scanned model anyhow

Anonymous at Mon, 28 Mar 2022 06:42:59 UTC No. 888859

>>888844
this

Also, scanning is good ONLY for recreating objects. But you can't create any from your own. Don't just learn the basics, but also go a bit further. No need to become an expert on sculpting, but y'know, be able to do something as simple as pic related
>Captcha: SSTDS

Anonymous at Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:49:06 UTC No. 889321

>>888615
I work professionally with a 3D scanner every day and I'm a traditionally trained sculptor.
What you're trying to do is in no way viable, it's both time intensive to clean up models and scanners are expensive.
It is technically possible, but a decent 3D scanner that also produces quality textures will cost you around 50k - and that will still require you a lot of time and effort for cleanup.
Even if you get a cheap scanner you will be required to learn how to retopologize, at which point it's already easier how to learn to model from scratch, especially if it's just shitty assets.

Anonymous at Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:13:15 UTC No. 889681

>>888615
only good for small anymals and engravings

Anonymous at Fri, 1 Apr 2022 19:13:03 UTC No. 889701

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87h_P2BXEag

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:33:51 UTC No. 890825

>>888615
I'm just gonna say what we are all thinking:
could you use this thing to make a 3d scan of your dick?
the only issues i could see with that would be staying hard long enough to get it scanned and fitting it on the platform. but you could just take some Viagra and cut a hole in the base.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:48:28 UTC No. 890842

Speaking of 3D cameras, I've noticed the Kinect has dropped in price significantly over the past year or two. Did a better budget alternative come out at some point or did demand just drop?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:20:05 UTC No. 890906

>>888859
>>888844
Not OP, but I've wanted something like this, because then you can get up close and personal and dissect things without destroying the things you own and without the hassle of a camera or magnifying glass. It sounds sort of useful
>I really want to pivot around this elephant's pajamas for some reason
>*yoink*

I bet CADfags love these things