Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 13:28:22 UTC No. 890427

Tbh I just use an Xbox kinect and skanect
Pic related is a bust of my sister that took longer to print than to clean up in meshmixer.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:00:59 UTC No. 890478

>>890427
doesnt look that detailed mate

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:14:14 UTC No. 890483

>>890478
its good enough to scan a fucking hat "mate" and it took 15 mins from scan start to print bed

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:22:14 UTC No. 890487

>>890483
i saw something last week about some nvidia research being able to do the same, but in seconds and it looks a lot better, kid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ2hcC1orc4

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:23:35 UTC No. 890488

>>890427
Yeah that is basically the type of quality we have since almost a decade and it doesn't get any better without paying literal thousands in professional equipment.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:16:28 UTC No. 890503

>>890487
> billions of dollars and a full team of research scientist could do it better than a guy with a $5 used Xbox kinect and a laptop from 2016.
wow
amazing.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:25:12 UTC No. 890505

>>890503
anon, your result looks really really really bad >>890427. You are so far behind >>890487

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:50:14 UTC No. 890515

Epic / Quixel just released their own mobile scanning app and I can't see any difference in quality from the rest of the scanning apps. Still very hard to achieve usable results. What was even the point?

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:10:48 UTC No. 890519

>>890505
>anon your $5 used xbox kinect and 10 mins of mesh 'work' looks really far behind the multi billion dollar corporation and dedicated research dept.
how will he ever recover ?!

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:32:03 UTC No. 890523

>>890519
You gotta admit there's "50 bucks, a pirated 3D modeling program and some random online tutorial" cheap and there's "I got this from the junkyard and somehow it still works" cheap. Just because something CAN do something doesn't mean it has to be the obvious option, much less the baseline of what the technology can do. Less than 100 dollars is still pretty cheap for how much you can do, and you can get excellent results without the need of a dedicated lab or top of the line scanners.

Anonymous at Wed, 6 Apr 2022 22:41:44 UTC No. 890553

virtually every solution below $2000 has the same shit results

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:38:31 UTC No. 891430

>>890487
did she have to make a duckface?