Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 19:55:30 UTC No. 890289

>>890280
They've come a long way since 2013. But we're very much up against diminishing returns seeing how good graphics has been for a long time now.
Available manhours from competent artists and production costs are the limiting factor.

Competent people burn out working for the usual suspect megastudious so talent becomes more diluted across numerous productions.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 19:59:52 UTC No. 890290

>>890289
>They've come a long way since 2013
You look at a big budget Marvel movie from 2013 and compare it to 2022 and if you lived in a bubble you really couldnt tell them apart.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:06:22 UTC No. 890292

>>890290
Because well made offline renders where already pretty much perfect in 2013. If there isn't any room for improvement improving is not possible.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:08:52 UTC No. 890295

>>890292
how is improvement not possible when the movies are not even in the VR space.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:21:05 UTC No. 890296

>>890295
Almost nobody wants to watch movies in VR. People hated 3D even when it was well made, now just imagine all the fuckery directors would make if they allowed us to turn our head to look around the environment.

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:27:19 UTC No. 890297

>>890296
>Almost nobody wants to watch movies in VR.
you have entirely different experiences in VR when its made for VR. With my headset its so fucking sweet, much better than a regular movie. But, if you're watching a traditional non vr movie in vr its really really bad

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:28:18 UTC No. 890299

>>890280
No, the thing is that CG is so good now that it's faster but if you want better results then you have to spend more time and money on shit and the hollywood execs prefer faster results than better looking ones, you can tell it has gotten better because entire movies are done in a greenscreen rather than mixing them with real sets like in the past

Anonymous at Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:33:57 UTC No. 890305

>>890299
>you can tell it has gotten better because entire movies are done in a greenscreen rather than mixing them with real sets like in the past
it actually looked better in the past, around 2009, like in terminator salvation

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:56:11 UTC No. 890774

https://youtu.be/LO0AXdLN8Gg

how was this made do you think? and why is this board so slow moving, only posting it here cause this is a somewhat recent thread (dead for 2 days)

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Apr 2022 04:58:06 UTC No. 890775

https://youtu.be/i7cia6AUyvE
how was this made do you think? and why is this board so slow moving, only posting it here cause this is a somewhat recent thread (dead for 2 days)

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:50:49 UTC No. 890816

>>890775
>why is this board so slow moving
Because it's about a niche interest newfags don't associate with 4Chan so even most people interested won't actually come here.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:49:24 UTC No. 891909

>>890295
>>890296
Motion sickness is one thing. A lot of people suffer from it, which means less money from sold tickets. A lot of moviegoers also want to sit down with popcorn and watch a movie without having to wear some clunky, pre-used, sweaty VR headset and have to turn around in their seats to watch the damn movie.
Small scale art events, sure, that could work, you kinda expect some sort of unique, mildly active experience there, but blockbusters for the common person (someone who would voluntarily watch a Marvel movie) aren't gonna go use VR until we manage to fit it into something tiny and let people know they won't have to do shit in their seats.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:25:57 UTC No. 891912

>>890775
>write a poem or whatever monologue
>use unreal engine to build little scenes from assets matching to whatever you are rambling about
>go stupid on after effects filters and plugins like posterize and pixel sorter
>put some sounds on it