Image not available

1920x1080

1656043875198.webm

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 905028

Can you spot what is wrong?

Anonymous No. 905030

yeah it's soi wars

Anonymous No. 905031

wtf are those random explosions and why are they mirrored

Anonymous No. 905032

>>905031

also how would the little ship just maneuver like that.. how did this retarded shit get so popular?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 905035

>>905028
Where's the background Disney?
Did you forget to lash the animators again?

Anonymous No. 905036

>>905028
Can those big destroyers really turn on a sixpence. I thought they used to be slower.

Anonymous No. 905053

>>905032
>also how would the little ship just maneuver like that.
Advanced sci-fi engines can generate thrust against the Aether. That makes it look like it's traveling through an atmosphere and generating lift with wings.

Anonymous No. 905054

>>905028
since when lasers stop at random and just go poof?

Image not available

1920x2156

1656091566475.png

Anonymous No. 905057

>>905028

Anonymous No. 905058

>>905031
>>905054
i'm guessing the lasers are hitting some sort of counter measures that are too small for to picked up on screen? it looks real dumb

Anonymous No. 905059

>>905058
>too small to be* picked up on screen

Anonymous No. 905062

>>905031
>>905054
>>905058
>>905059
It's probably meant to be a flak cannon

Anonymous No. 905063

>>905028
Fire in space?

Anonymous No. 905066

>>905057
This is the answer. Why doesn't lighting change on destroyer even though it's turning? Probably because they used blender.

Anonymous No. 905084

>>905066
It is changing slightly as it turns. You can see the shadows change near the end, BUT the camera is doing most of the turn. its an optical illusion.

Anonymous No. 905088

>>905053
No that's not the problem, the ship is going faster than the speed of light. No star wars ship has manage to outrun a laser, they always do something like spin or get lucky that the laser did not hit them because stormtroopers suck at aiming.

Also the ship is like a planet so it went way faster than normal in that speed.

Image not available

1920x1080

0001-0377.webm

Anonymous No. 905094

>>905057

Image not available

1502x852

tarded.jpg

Anonymous No. 905105

In the sea of bad cg you choose to put work into this?

Anonymous No. 905106

>>905105
That's the Rogue One model

Anonymous No. 905107

>>905084
The stars do not move, what do you mean the camera is turning?

Anonymous No. 905126

>>905028
There's nothing wrong with it. Star Destroyer turns towards camera, shadows all seem correct. It's even more correct than on film as this webm is silent, it's perfect.

Anonymous No. 905186

>>905126
except the huge ship that is big as a planet moved faster than normal and the small ship went faster than light. No star wars ship has ever did this, this ruins space logic fantasy.

Anonymous No. 905205

>>905186
In universe a Star Destroyer is 1.6km long. About five times longer than this carrier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziCvqZIyjto

Way it moves seems appropriate for a warship of that size. I can buy that people forward and aft could survive the maneuvers depicted.

Anonymous No. 905215

>>905205
1 mile is not the correct size, if you compare it to older star wars scenes you can see that it is bigger than 1 mile because the rebels fight it with their ships. Also there is another ship inside the ship, which means it is way bigger than 1 mile. The one mile you got was maybe from disney version because i seen a lot of people say 1 mile to the disney moves but fail to fit many of the historical features that comes with it under 1 mile.

Anonymous No. 905241

>>905028
Lighting of the Star Destroyer doesn't change as it moves.
The smaller ship doesn't obey inertia.

Anonymous No. 905250

>>905028
There are shadows that move on the ship when it turns, so it's likely an artistic decision to have the left part of the ship in shadow the entire time. Not commenting on whether it's a good decision or not.
Either that, or the lighting is at some kind of angle that is hard to nail down and is playing tricks since we can't see where it's coming from.

Anonymous No. 905444

>>905215
>>905186

...are you retarded? It seems like you're retarded.

Anonymous No. 905446

>>905028
Baked lighting

Anonymous No. 905482

>>905028
the empire built a destroyer without gimbaled weapon mounts.
but the reason the lighting doesn't change is likely a compositional choice

Anonymous No. 905494

>>905444
One mile is not the right size or are you confuse as to what 1 mile is in your metric size because either way you are still wrong.

Anonymous No. 905498

>>905028
The small ship and the destroyer are lit independently of one another.

Anonymous No. 905499

>>905498
They're not. Post a frame where this allegedly happens - you can't because there is none.

Image not available

400x400

1381520516775.gif

Anonymous No. 905505

>>905028
They're not shooting a large AOE explosive that will hit an entire area. Wasting resources on small precision lasers.

Also, not deploying TIEs to intercept.

Anonymous No. 905513

>>905058
nah, SW has always explosive lasers because reasons.

Anonymous No. 905532

They are fighting in a black void
>inb4 space is a black void

Anonymous No. 905547

>>905513
Not that anon, and I know they've always had em, which I'm fine with, but damn those explosions look actually retarded. Like the same 2d sprite each time and for some reason blows away in the vacuum of space.

Anonymous No. 905601

>>905057
I thought that too but the shadows do spread a little, maybe not as much as is necessary though.

Anonymous No. 907988

>>905028
Aah yess I can spot it! Oh you...

Image not available

680x800

1656102032137.png

Anonymous No. 907993

>>905057

Anonymous No. 908000

>>907993
Kek

Anonymous No. 908233

>>907993
heh

Anonymous No. 908253

>>905107
That's because the stars are either a flat image composited in, or are set to always face the camera

Anonymous No. 908310

>>907993
Lmao

Anonymous No. 909863

>>905028
Maybe it's a stylistic choice, faggot

Anonymous No. 910029

>>905028
Obviously, I can't remember the way every space scene in the films was filmed, but I feel like they wouldn't have made this scene so long or they would have done it from another angle.
The way how the small ship is running from the star destroyer and seems to be able to outrun it but for some reason was right above it, in the beginning kinda reminds me of video game cutscenes, like that one in Star Wars Clone Wars game where Obi-wan and Anakin are flying their fighters in the middle of empty space but suddenly they notice a separatist fleet right in front of them when the camera angle changes to reveal them.