๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:51:38 UTC No. 905028
Can you spot what is wrong?
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:55:00 UTC No. 905030
yeah it's soi wars
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:55:36 UTC No. 905031
wtf are those random explosions and why are they mirrored
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:56:44 UTC No. 905032
>>905031
also how would the little ship just maneuver like that.. how did this retarded shit get so popular?
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:04:27 UTC No. 905035
>>905028
Where's the background Disney?
Did you forget to lash the animators again?
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:06:29 UTC No. 905036
>>905028
Can those big destroyers really turn on a sixpence. I thought they used to be slower.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:08:24 UTC No. 905053
>>905032
>also how would the little ship just maneuver like that.
Advanced sci-fi engines can generate thrust against the Aether. That makes it look like it's traveling through an atmosphere and generating lift with wings.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:09:04 UTC No. 905054
>>905028
since when lasers stop at random and just go poof?
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:27:58 UTC No. 905058
>>905031
>>905054
i'm guessing the lasers are hitting some sort of counter measures that are too small for to picked up on screen? it looks real dumb
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:28:59 UTC No. 905059
>>905058
>too small to be* picked up on screen
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:37:09 UTC No. 905062
>>905031
>>905054
>>905058
>>905059
It's probably meant to be a flak cannon
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:49:06 UTC No. 905063
>>905028
Fire in space?
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:08:41 UTC No. 905066
>>905057
This is the answer. Why doesn't lighting change on destroyer even though it's turning? Probably because they used blender.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 22:59:16 UTC No. 905084
>>905066
It is changing slightly as it turns. You can see the shadows change near the end, BUT the camera is doing most of the turn. its an optical illusion.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 23:19:50 UTC No. 905088
>>905053
No that's not the problem, the ship is going faster than the speed of light. No star wars ship has manage to outrun a laser, they always do something like spin or get lucky that the laser did not hit them because stormtroopers suck at aiming.
Also the ship is like a planet so it went way faster than normal in that speed.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 02:46:31 UTC No. 905106
>>905105
That's the Rogue One model
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 03:07:04 UTC No. 905107
>>905084
The stars do not move, what do you mean the camera is turning?
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 06:00:08 UTC No. 905126
>>905028
There's nothing wrong with it. Star Destroyer turns towards camera, shadows all seem correct. It's even more correct than on film as this webm is silent, it's perfect.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:25:21 UTC No. 905186
>>905126
except the huge ship that is big as a planet moved faster than normal and the small ship went faster than light. No star wars ship has ever did this, this ruins space logic fantasy.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 15:11:43 UTC No. 905205
>>905186
In universe a Star Destroyer is 1.6km long. About five times longer than this carrier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziC
Way it moves seems appropriate for a warship of that size. I can buy that people forward and aft could survive the maneuvers depicted.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 17:39:18 UTC No. 905215
>>905205
1 mile is not the correct size, if you compare it to older star wars scenes you can see that it is bigger than 1 mile because the rebels fight it with their ships. Also there is another ship inside the ship, which means it is way bigger than 1 mile. The one mile you got was maybe from disney version because i seen a lot of people say 1 mile to the disney moves but fail to fit many of the historical features that comes with it under 1 mile.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 20:22:24 UTC No. 905241
>>905028
Lighting of the Star Destroyer doesn't change as it moves.
The smaller ship doesn't obey inertia.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 Jun 2022 21:12:33 UTC No. 905250
>>905028
There are shadows that move on the ship when it turns, so it's likely an artistic decision to have the left part of the ship in shadow the entire time. Not commenting on whether it's a good decision or not.
Either that, or the lighting is at some kind of angle that is hard to nail down and is playing tricks since we can't see where it's coming from.
Anonymous at Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:23:25 UTC No. 905444
>>905215
>>905186
...are you retarded? It seems like you're retarded.
Anonymous at Sun, 26 Jun 2022 19:02:55 UTC No. 905446
>>905028
Baked lighting
Anonymous at Sun, 26 Jun 2022 22:29:09 UTC No. 905482
>>905028
the empire built a destroyer without gimbaled weapon mounts.
but the reason the lighting doesn't change is likely a compositional choice
Anonymous at Sun, 26 Jun 2022 23:54:38 UTC No. 905494
>>905444
One mile is not the right size or are you confuse as to what 1 mile is in your metric size because either way you are still wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:34:21 UTC No. 905498
>>905028
The small ship and the destroyer are lit independently of one another.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:40:21 UTC No. 905499
>>905498
They're not. Post a frame where this allegedly happens - you can't because there is none.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 02:57:14 UTC No. 905513
>>905058
nah, SW has always explosive lasers because reasons.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:03:53 UTC No. 905532
They are fighting in a black void
>inb4 space is a black void
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:20:51 UTC No. 905547
>>905513
Not that anon, and I know they've always had em, which I'm fine with, but damn those explosions look actually retarded. Like the same 2d sprite each time and for some reason blows away in the vacuum of space.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:18:09 UTC No. 905601
>>905057
I thought that too but the shadows do spread a little, maybe not as much as is necessary though.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Jul 2022 01:23:55 UTC No. 907988
>>905028
Aah yess I can spot it! Oh you...
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:44:17 UTC No. 908000
>>907993
Kek
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:06:44 UTC No. 908233
>>907993
heh
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:46:18 UTC No. 908253
>>905107
That's because the stars are either a flat image composited in, or are set to always face the camera
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Jul 2022 05:59:39 UTC No. 908310
>>907993
Lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:33:40 UTC No. 909863
>>905028
Maybe it's a stylistic choice, faggot
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:55:10 UTC No. 910029
>>905028
Obviously, I can't remember the way every space scene in the films was filmed, but I feel like they wouldn't have made this scene so long or they would have done it from another angle.
The way how the small ship is running from the star destroyer and seems to be able to outrun it but for some reason was right above it, in the beginning kinda reminds me of video game cutscenes, like that one in Star Wars Clone Wars game where Obi-wan and Anakin are flying their fighters in the middle of empty space but suddenly they notice a separatist fleet right in front of them when the camera angle changes to reveal them.