Image not available

1024x800

cinema4dr21_000-1....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 915456

>no Cinema 4D thread

Why does /3/ hate this software?

Anonymous No. 915457

>>915456
>maxon

Anonymous No. 915458

sir, kind reminder that /3/rd world only discusses industry standard software.

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 915476

it's for mograph pros not making video games

Anonymous No. 915477

>>915458
half this board at any given time is pro-blender/anti-blender culture war autism

Anonymous No. 915479

it's mainly used for motion graphics which is why it's integrated into after effects.

Anonymous No. 915480

>>915479
arent all animations "motion" graphics, anon?

Anonymous No. 915482

>>915480
no.

Anonymous No. 915485

>>915482
they are in motion, since they are animated, so "yes".

Anonymous No. 915511

>>915456
I also wonder. When I went to school (more than decade ago) C4D was top notch and they used to teach us with it. Later I stopped doing /3/ stuff, switched fields completely. Ffw ten years, I started playing with 3D purely on hobby level and while I immediately went with Blender (because it is free) I am still wondering why Cinema pretty much does not exist for this board.

Anonymous No. 915517

>>915511
I still use c4d as my primary modelling program desu. I like the UI/UX most compared to the other major shit

fewer plugins on cgp tho, so I got everything installed for whatever usecase I need them for

Anonymous No. 915520

>>915511
the interests of this board are usually

1. make pornography
2. make video games

C4d is not popular for either of those tasks, it is godawful a lot of creation work actually it literally doesn't support UDIMs by default so I literally just could not use it for my work at all.

If you wanna make motion graphics (tv stuff etc.) or shitty simulation videos for instagram it's the go-to and nobody here wants to do that shit.

Anonymous No. 916020

>Why does /3/ hate this software?
because Cinema 4D is fucking retarded

Anonymous No. 916219

>>916020
But why

Anonymous No. 916261

>>915456
is there a software /3/ doesn't hate?

Anonymous No. 916262

>>916261
Blender. Love it love it love it

Anonymous No. 916269

>>915456
>>916261
>treating /3/ as one monolithic entity

Anonymous No. 916275

>>916269
Not an entity but a council

Anonymous No. 917242

>>915520
I use it for porn.
I should learn Blender because it's simply better for everything, but I'm not bothered enough with C4D to move. If you wanna do character animation, though, yeah, C4D's not the best choice. It's not a terrible choice either. I'm ignoring the steep price for a license, though.
>>915511
Yeah, the pre-R25 UI is so god damn good. I don't mind 3DS Max UI, so I think I'm not a complete tard who can ONLY use Cinema, but I can't stand Blender's UI.
For industry software C4D has always been playing catch-up, and the gap is only getting wider. Even the newfangled WIP Scene Nodes don't seem to have much traction compared to Blender's Geometry Nodes.

Anonymous No. 917266

>>915456
C4D is used by pretentious Instagram "artists", no matter how good the software is, I really want nothing to do with it or that "community". Not that the alternatives are much better. Cult of Blender and Autocucks are just as bad.

Anonymous No. 917267

>>917266
blender is an amazing program and gives you the full source of the program for free. You are dunning kruger personified.

Anonymous No. 917276

>>917266
>not using a program because of the community surrounding it
That's already a retarded mindset with vidya. Caring about Instagram thots in regards to using 3D software is something else.

Image not available

702x702

1634729810103.jpg

YHWH loves you (the person reading this post) No. 917295

>>915456
Its ok but too expensive for what it does. Maxon you need to lower your prices... even Autodesk offers full versions of Maya for ~20 a month lol.
Pretty much all of the 3D software is very affordable these days, except yours.
Sure, Marvelous is a little pricey but they have a much more interesting niche.
Maxon One does not simply offer enough to be worth 99 bucks a month!! You guys are huffing glue over there...

Anonymous No. 917297

>>917295
100/mo is nothing in this economy. Thats only 1200 a year...

Anonymous No. 917346

>>917297
how about
0/Month
because you can.
how about that anon?
huh?
thats what i thought, paypig.

Anonymous No. 917349

>>917346
Get a JOB and stop stealing

Image not available

1200x874

C4D26.jpg

Anonymous No. 917353

>>915456
New #C4D is out!
β€’ Vertex maps work on parametric objects (no more need to make objects editable!)
β€’ New soft body dynamics with stickiness feature
β€’ New symmetry hub that allows you to easily model/sculpt symmetrically without a Symmetry Object

What’s your favorite feature?

Anonymous No. 917365

>>917353
For porn, the new mixing soft body simulation with animation feature sounds amazing. Finally you can do proper dynamic jiggly bits.
Being able to use vertex maps on primitives and stuff is cool, even if I mostly use them on polygonal objects. I hope vertex maps on skinned objects can now be affected by other skinned objects; last time I tried that in R20, one of the objects didn't take the Skin deformer into account. Maybe I only messed up with priorities, who knows.
Also,
>topological symmetry
Nice.

Image not available

300x225

95b8c05ab9b3abcb0....gif

Anonymous No. 917375

>>915456

"Hate" is a strong word. I think /3/ just doesn't care, or is too busy in Blender/Autodesk fights. I enjoy using C4D for box modelling, but it isn't the best software for sculpting, UV unwrapping, or animation. But for making a prop for a game or cartoon? Geometry first in C4D, then export to somewhere else for the rest.

Image not available

1280x720

B069C65E-48FE-415....jpg

Anonymous No. 917380

>>917349
Sir, my job is stealing.

Anonymous No. 917390

>>915456
No Linux support makes me turn my head the other way.

Anonymous No. 917392

>>917375
Yeah c4ds poly modelling toolkit is actually really logical and reasonable just the supports around it for asset creation like the UVs etc. are awful man. Works out okay for them because most c4d users don't model stuff

Anonymous No. 917406

>>917267
I'm not criticizing blender, I'm criticizing the retards that shill it from the rooftops.
For what it's worth, I use it too. But I'm not going to shit on someone for using something else if it works for them (except maybe C4D if they regurgitate Beeple shit). I use it because I know it, and it works for me. I'm not about to try and force it on anyone else or try to pretend like it has an edge over anything else. Skill is the only real thing that shows at the end of the day when using a program. Different ones might offer different speeds to do things or offer novel workflows, but you can pretty much make the same thing in anything.

>>917276
It is what it is.
For what it's worth, I wasn't going to use it in the first place. No use chucking a decade's worth of experience in one program to use C4D. If I were to do that, I'd probably just use Maya or Max.
C4D is in some kind of weird middle zone. Not industry standard (except maybe for mograph) so it's not super widely adopted, and it's not free, so it doesn't have a bunch of people picking it up. Which leaves the majority of people using it being the same crowd that acts like Apple is the bee's knees (and can't get viruses), huff their own farts, and work on shit in Starbucks.
Like I said, it is what it is.

Anonymous No. 917507

>>917349
>Stealing
ser - stealing implies i have took away company's software from their servers, physically.

i merely copied it.

seethe more paypig

Anonymous No. 917508

>>917507
You can steal digital currency like bitcoin for example and the justice depts take that very seriously. You have no idea what you are talking about

Anonymous No. 917524

>>917508
It would be taking it from the owner and not copying - ergo there would be loss of goods.

it is You who do not know anything about, stop being a retard or kys.

Anonymous No. 917606

>>915456
C4D and motion graphic in general is more >>>/gd/ than /3/

Anonymous No. 917610

>>917524
please stop posting about digital theft. Clearly you have never created anything.

Image not available

652x692

1231112312.jpg

Anonymous No. 917642

>>917610

Anonymous No. 917648

>>917606
/gd/ is somehow lower iq than /3/ tho
i'm surprised they haven't stabbed themselves in the eye with their styluses

Anonymous No. 917649

>>917642
>still using reaction images in current year
absolute cringe

Anonymous No. 917650

>>917649
you do realize You are a C4D user in 2022 ?

Anonymous No. 917651

>>917650
I've only the program once for about 10 minutes and that was the trial. I'm here to inform you about stealing and how you are stealing

Anonymous No. 917654

>>917651
If you gave up after 10 minutes no wonder you cant even comprehend basic concepts.

still not stealing, cope and seethe paypig jew.

Anonymous No. 917659

>>917648
/gd/fags are more hypebeasty and always fall for the fotm trends. they also had more sex.

/3/ would require bigger brains and new trends in cg are less frequent and more stable

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 917663

>>917659
/3/ design can be very trendy t bh.

there is an absolutely massive gulf in skill between the average poster on /r/c4d and someone working at manvmachine or even places like the mill. i think most of /gd/ is the firmly in the latter camp. i think i've spotted one guy doing decent product viz there one time.

Anonymous No. 917664

>>917659
/3/ design can be very trendy t bh.

that said, there is an absolutely massive gulf in skill between the average poster on /r/c4d and someone working at manvmachine or even places like the mill. i think most of /gd/ is the firmly in the former camp. i think i've spotted one guy doing decent product viz there one time.