Image not available

720x720

nvidia-geforce-rt....webm

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Nvidia GeForce 40 Series (Ada Lovelace Architecture) Revealed

Anonymous No. 918920

How are we feeling about this, /3/?

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/40-series/

Anonymous No. 918925

>only 24GB
>only 16GB
>only 12GB
trash

Anonymous No. 918928

>>918920

>we feeling Who the fuck cares about feelings are you a woman?

Anonymous No. 918929

Not even paper launch, straight up vaporware that's how i feel. Fuck electronics.

Anonymous No. 918962

not /3/


fuck off

Anonymous No. 918963

>>918920
very underwhelming

Anonymous No. 918964

>>918962
>hardware for accelerating 3D rendering
>utilized in 3D rendering applications
>not /3/

Anonymous No. 918966

>>918964
>brings absolutely nothing new to 3D, just more computing power and processing speed
Not /3/

Anonymous No. 918970

I don't even know when I'm gonna update my PC nor what GPU to buy anymore. I've been using my laptop for years at this point, I've got gtx 960 in my desktop lol. I can't even use Nanite in Unreal, performance is not the best either. And I realy don't want to wait ANOTHER 2 years for 5xxx series.

Anonymous No. 918972

>>918970
take it to /g/

closing this thread.

Anonymous No. 918978

>>918920
we typically discuss cut down castrated bricks for goymers with "rtx" fad cores in /v/ or /g/

Anonymous No. 918979

They had to gimp the 4080 12gb didn't they.

Anonymous No. 918983

Incoming 4070 with 2 variants, 10 GB and 8 GB
$749 for the 10 GB and $649 for the 8GB.

Such AI, much models.

Anonymous No. 919001

>>918920
>2X-4X IMPROVEMENT!
>compares baseline without DLSS vs new DLSS
>refuses to elaborate further

to the trash it goes

Anonymous No. 919008

this: >>919001. probably a 15% uplift for rendering and general compute at best

>>918979
i think the 4080 12gb is just a last minute rebrand of what was supposed to be a 4070

Anonymous No. 919024

>>918966
Agree.

Anonymous No. 919126

Between getting a 3090 and a 4090, is it worth the price difference? Does DLSS 3 benefit us in something?

Anonymous No. 919162

>>919126
t bh 2x 3090 + nvlink might actually be the secret smart move depending on your memory requirements.

Anonymous No. 919166

>>919162
This. This is what I've done. 24GB is such a large limitation even with the performance a 4090 could give you.

I bought a second 3090 2nd hand as soon as I heard they had dropped NV-Link for the 4000 series

Anonymous No. 919173

>>919162
NV llink doesnt really do anything for multi gpu rendering.

Anonymous No. 919195

Despite having 3x more transistors and paper teraflops, raw performance seems to be barely higher than Ampere. Looks like all those transistors went to DLSS 3.0. They get "4x more performance" by rendering every 4th frame and interpolating the rest. Not helpful to us in any way.

Anonymous No. 919213

>>919173
I'm >>919126
what would you say then?

Anonymous No. 919215

>>919173
iirc scenes need to be loaded completely onto each gpu so you'd get capped at 24 gigs despite having multiple gpus in the box. nvlink would pool the memory and allow larger scenes. there is a perf cost i believe, but it's better than out of core.

>>919213
go ask somewhere smarter than here like the discord community of your renderer of choice.

>>919195
otoy's making some big claims about perf but they shill pretty hard. it'll take awhile before the renderers update anyway.

Anonymous No. 919218

>>919215
even without nv link each gpu gets things loaded into it. what nvlink used to do was to pool it together true, but now its pretty much a gimmick.
You would get about 1-2% increased efficiency with NVlink - data gets loaded into each card either way.

>>919213
currently You can get 3090TI for 1000 bucks if not less if used.

I can only speculate but it is not worth to spend 600+ bucks more for 10-15% increased workspeed. you might as well get 2x 3090's.

Anonymous No. 919229

>>919126
>Does DLSS 3 benefit us in something?
no
DLSS 3.0 uses motion vectors to create blend frames, if you want 1 frame performance for super fast renders this wont do shit for you, and even in animation rendering there is nothing to be gained

Image not available

1281x608

studio-ada-perf-c....png

Anonymous No. 919235

Anonymous No. 919243

>>918920
>>3.5 slots
it's a chunky boi

Anonymous No. 919341

>>919235
>nvidia provided comparisons
I would be very careful anon.

Anonymous No. 919366

>>919341
Good point, but at least they can't cheat with DLSS here.

Image not available

720x900

Nvidyas_dancve.webm

Anonymous No. 919369

Hopefully there's an affordable 4070 with 16gb for offline render. Maybe a sub $1000 3090 would be best bang for buck with both offline and UE5?

Anonymous No. 919379

>>919369
I doubt it considering the base 4080 is only 12gb. We will have to wait for the TI variants of these, which will probably be 2 years away, seeing how the market is going.

Anonymous No. 919432

>>919366
watch it them comparing the image clarity for long render without AI denoiser
vs
comparable quality with new AI denosier.

most of the time their AI denoiser is only good for stills and not animation/motion (see glitches during gameplay)

Anonymous No. 920052

>>919166
>they had dropped NV-Link for the 4000 series
So.. if I have space in my motherboard for 2 GPUs then it's pointless if I have 4 series?

I can't buy two 4090 and make a pool of VRAM?

Anonymous No. 920064

>>920052
It was always pointles buy A6000 goy

Anonymous No. 920092

>>920064
what?

Anonymous No. 920114

>>920064
You are retarded. The biggest reason to pay a premium for those is on-demand driver support, which only enterprises need.

Anonymous No. 920136

>>920064
>buy A6000
>DO NOT BUY WATER COOLER BLOCK SEVERAL 3090TI'S THIS IS NOT THE WAY GOYIM