Anonymous at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:28:58 UTC No. 919900

>>919899
SOVL!

the chair nerd at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:34:44 UTC No. 919903

>>919899
Sovl x2

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:46:08 UTC No. 919905

soulless
the early CG animations that stand out were all ambitious despite technical limitations, but this is using fake technical limitations as an excuse not to be ambitious.
she barely moves and the "reach hand" animation is recycled 4 times.

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:27:02 UTC No. 919913

ΣΩVL
VGH THEY JVΣT DΩN'T MΛKE IT LIKE THEY VΣE TΩ NΩWΛDΛYΣ

Anonymous at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:36:13 UTC No. 919914

>>919905
see, this is why they produce goyslop like Dragon Ball Super in the style of modern Yamamuro instead of replicating the old.
Because they don't wanna deal with the pack of autists saying it's ingenuine.

>inb4 someone brings up the tumblr ball z fan cartoon: Legend

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:57:39 UTC No. 919966

>>919905
This.
The entire animation is just lazy bullshit. You know what happened in early CG animations? Everything actually moved. A LOT. Very expressively, too.

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:36:53 UTC No. 919969

>>919905
now what you're looking for, but this have more soul regardless: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYAQ3N9Tck8

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:40:52 UTC No. 919970

>>919969
Now that's what I'm talking about. True SOVL.

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:50:07 UTC No. 919983

>>919905

Unnecessarily harsh, imo.

>the early CG animations that stand out were all ambitious despite technical limitations, but this is using fake technical limitations as an excuse not to be ambitious.

Ambition isn't required to sell something. The animator wanted to evoke the feeling of the early web and they succeeded, and succeeding in making the audience feel something is more important than any display of skill.

Though I will say, there's a certain degree of skill in making a character model that atrocious still have appeal. Look at that fucking thing. Cris could model it, except if he did, it'd look hideous, even though it's within his technical ability, he'd still make it look utterly unlikeable.

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:03:14 UTC No. 919986

>>919905
>soulless
You clearly have no idea what "soul" means.

Anonymous at Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:04:33 UTC No. 920089

>>919986
This is SOUL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_PT3JF_ywk
https://youtu.be/3ulZxtgBcIU
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KPgeN-2QM1A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqZaruA5KKw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l3QaTjnduQ

Anonymous at Thu, 29 Sep 2022 19:24:36 UTC No. 920195

>>920089
>appealing characters, good animations and editing not to mention the charming sound effects and music
very refreshing to see compared to the "ironic" low poly youtube channels

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 1 Oct 2022 14:24:24 UTC No. 920459

I dunno about soul v soulles
But this dude has the imperfections of early digital/3d animation down really well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3-08WyjcpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W03QolodBB8

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Oct 2022 14:27:03 UTC No. 920460

I dunno about soul v soulles
But this dude has the imperfections of early digital/3d animation down really well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3-08WyjcpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W03QolodBB8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnRz9Tp4WEk

Anonymous at Sat, 1 Oct 2022 21:02:52 UTC No. 920497

>soul soul soul soul soulless soulless soulless

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Oct 2022 07:39:21 UTC No. 922085

zoomer fetishizing ""vhs aesthetics" will always be souless and cringe. its the same thing like how millenial hipsters fetishized vinyl. imagine how the future gen alpha fetishizes tiktok and social media. retrofagging will always be cringe
also, dilate tranny.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Oct 2022 08:38:47 UTC No. 922088

>le hecking old animation !!!
>wahoo!!! the hecking 90s!!!
yeah...

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:22:00 UTC No. 922261

>>919899
>le vhs filter!!!!!!
>le low poly!!!!!!!!!!!11
it's amazing i've still never seen a single attempt to recreate the look of old 3D that doesn't miss the point entirely of what made it cool. old 3D was clean, consistent and to the point of things, not messy and blurry. new shit is messy and blurry which is why it looks like shit too. old 3d had the advantage of being made at a time when 3D still had its roots in CAD-based design. now everything is a clusterfuck and nobody knows what they're doing or what they want to do.