Image not available

1080x1080

1647053872288.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 922143

Why does it still look so distorted after I rendered it with over 2000 samples?

Anonymous No. 922145

>>922143
you need to use a spectral renderer like luxcore to be able to sample into those areas effectively

Anonymous No. 922146

>>922145
So you're saying this is about as good as it gets with blender cycles?

Anonymous No. 922151

>>922146
yes

Anonymous No. 922155

>>922151
Hurr durr

Anonymous No. 922160

Because you are using a bad render engine.

Anonymous No. 922386

>>922155
>Generalist tool is worse at doing a "thing" than a specialize software build around the "thing".
>wtf why can blender be just as good??? wtf I just want to use blender but get same results if not better!!!!
If you use a software that has to improve 1 million things to keep up don't be amazed when a software that have to improve 10 things performs better at a single task.

Image not available

688x298

file.png

Anonymous No. 922404

>>922386
This is why compositing is a thing, and why most professionals will complete a single project using more than 5 different tools. Use the best tool for the job.
I'm a total Blenderfag, and I only use Blender, but I'm also not a professional. Blender is not the "best" tool for any job. It's a very good generalist tool that will get you at least most of the way there on every front. It's a great all-in-one for hobbyists and learners, but if you want the absolute best results, you should be looking elsewhere. If you want the absolute best results for every stage in the pipeline, you look a lot of different places.

Anonymous No. 922436

>>922146
luxcore is free nigger. why handicap yourself with only using cycles. just download luxcore like he said, and install it in blender.

http://wiki.luxcorerender.org/BlendLuxCore_Installation