🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Dec 2022 06:28:58 UTC No. 928547
is 3d going to be replaced by ai?
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Dec 2022 07:30:51 UTC No. 928553
>>928547
Yes, eventually. Eventually art careers will be mostly a thing of the past, reserved only for the best of the best.
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:32:05 UTC No. 928562
Like most art it will be replaced for AI because companies like big profits with little costs. Its why a lot of game companies are now using 3D scans for environments. The environmental artist role has been thrown out for years now. Usually they hire technical artists or specific 3D character artists.
There are some AI tools now that generate environment assets. Theres still a use for people who unwrap and clean up though. I assume thats going shortly too just like the poor 2D artists that are suffering from AI right now.
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Dec 2022 09:59:01 UTC No. 928569
>>928547
of course
the question is, what are you gonna do about it?
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:22:02 UTC No. 928570
That face paint is giving me monkeypox.
Anonymous at Thu, 8 Dec 2022 23:11:46 UTC No. 929016
>>928547
Grunt workers will be replaced. The barrier to entry for expression in the medium will be lower. People will lose their jobs and bitch about it, but more people will get to make their own shit. Who the fuck wants to make 10 boring ass models a day for someone who doesn't share your creative vision anyway?
The first people to go will be the grunts in other countries who get the work no one really gives a shit about. I'm pretty happy with where this all is going.
Anonymous at Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:33:10 UTC No. 929030
>>929016
>10 boring ass models a day
Hah, actually it can be more like 1 model a week, unless you're crapping out some low poly mobile garbo. But yeah, ultimately that shit is pretty boring and I look forward tgkwp8o AI tools.
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Dec 2022 23:20:44 UTC No. 929375
By legal definition, everything AI makes falls into "public domain".
Selling anything which is public domain, including games, as copyrighted material is fraud.
You could argue that AI can help artists make more work in less time, which would thus allow it to become copyrighted material.
>Pic very related
>Laws would have to change, first, for AI to replace people
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:22:05 UTC No. 929557
>>928553
And of course that will go too because no one will learn the craft with such heavy competition :)
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:24:08 UTC No. 929558
>>928553
Or autistic richfags like they've historically been.
>Noooooo! I'm not a pleb, my govt school teacher said I could be an astronaut president!
Anonymous at Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:57:57 UTC No. 929776
>>928562
>The environmental artist role has been thrown out for years now
no you retard, its still like over half any art team lmao
Anonymous at Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:06:33 UTC No. 929790
>>928547
AI will replace humanity
Anonymous at Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:43:36 UTC No. 929794
>>928547
No. Despite what social media may have you thinking AIs are not making art, they are searching a database of images associated to words and mixing results. They are unable of interpreting emotions or creatively conveying meaning. At best they`ll be a tool for brainstorming and pitching general ideas (which artist already do by using references from masters they find online anyways). Furthermore an uneducated eye won`t be able to interpret the given information to narrow down which elements would better suit the specific needs of a project so artists will still be required. A hack that can only write prompts and inputs won`t cut it, specially if one accounts for consistency and translating a concept or abstract idea to something that`s actually usable as you need creativity and problem solving skills. This issue is being hyped out of proportion...
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Dec 2022 08:47:00 UTC No. 930192
>>929794
shhh, don't tell the pajeets this.
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:00:27 UTC No. 930274
>>929552
nice the best black hiring practice
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:24:13 UTC No. 930276
Not at the moment. There is a interesting tool being worked on rn that doesnt use point cloud generation model. But of course the topology is still not workable. I believe there will still be some need of human input for 3D
Anonymous at Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:10:20 UTC No. 930286
>>928547
Wake me up when Ai can make a minute long animation in 3D.
Anonymous at Sat, 31 Dec 2022 01:28:49 UTC No. 931617
>>928547
Why the women look like shit it won’t sell who’s gonna buy it the 10 feminist that play it, it’s ducking trash
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Jan 2023 05:32:00 UTC No. 931838
>>928547
AI isn't replacing anything it's just another tool. We will merge with the machine.
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:44:11 UTC No. 931852
>>930274
>implying your job isn't the next one to be replaced
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:59:13 UTC No. 931857
>>929552
Based
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:12:00 UTC No. 932140
>>928547
according to the interview with some guy working on AI, ideally all digital media will be automated within a few years and made free through devaluing all the work required to make it through having an AGI that can just spit out whatever you want from songs to complete video games in a few seconds.
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:14:04 UTC No. 932141
>>932140
a person that needs the public to think it is legit in order to pay his rent says it's legit? HOLY SHIT BRO THAT'S AMAZING
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:17:40 UTC No. 932142
>>928547
>is 3d going to be replaced by ai?
AI and 3D aren't mutually exclusive.
AI is just a type of generic algorithms capable of learning and pattern matching. AI is used for way more applications than making porn with Stable Diffusion.
3D itself is a technology used for automating content production. Instead of manually drawing every frame individually you create a model that can be automatically rendered in any way you want. AI is also a automation technology. The synergy couldn't be more obvious. AI generated 3D content already exists to some extent. I, for one, welcome it.
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:18:07 UTC No. 932143
>>932140
>that can just spit out whatever you want from songs to complete video games in a few seconds.
also that is the most laughable thing I have ever heard. did we suddenly get infinite energy and computational power? the only thing I've seen AI *actually* do is crunch man-made images together into endresults that range from soulless/bland/generic (10%) to basically just noise (90%).
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 08:20:08 UTC No. 932144
>>932141
we already have that nvidia AI that can generate 3d models a month ago. it's nothing much now, but whose to say by the end of this year we won't have moment like the end of last year where ever 2d artist started fearing for their livelihoods.
Anonymous at Wed, 4 Jan 2023 15:46:20 UTC No. 932172
>>928547
No. The success of handmade goods on Etsy shows there will always be a place for handmade creations in human civilization.
Anonymous at Fri, 6 Jan 2023 01:27:57 UTC No. 932374
>>928547
Yes. There will be no need for polygons, modeling, rigging, texturing, animation etc... images will just be generated.
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Jan 2023 05:05:49 UTC No. 932681
>>928547
>ncsoft
pfffffftt hahahahahahahahahaha there goes the ip!
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Jan 2023 10:44:16 UTC No. 932698
>>929557
People thought the camera was going to replace art becaus before the camera, art was a way to visualize and capture landscapes and people, but then art evolved.
people will continue to do art, traditionally, for the love of it, and perhaps installation art and more physical media will regain popularity. AI art will simply be a different category, and used to replace commercial art, the way the camera did before that.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:21:19 UTC No. 932796
>>928547
fellas, sketchfab changed their content policy (most probably to allow AI training of 3D models)
if you have no interest in contributing your data, I suggest delete your sketchfab account
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Jan 2023 03:42:23 UTC No. 932797
>>928562
serious question what does a technical artist do exactly cause i see lots of openings for that job
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:21:14 UTC No. 933105
>>928547
Everything fun is going to replaced by AI first by techjeets that think that automation will create a utopia for everyone. It's the exact opposite of the lie that we were sold decades ago. I can't say whether other AIs will advance as quickly as the one for digital art, but if there's a will, there's a way. I think music will be the safest just because of how litigious the music industry is, but given enough time, it MIGHT be at risk. The best thing everyone in any creative field can hope for at this point, is that all the techjeets get replaced as well. And no, there wont be UBI to save us. We'll be forced into a small subset of jobs, mostly back-breaking labor, and we'll "be happy." See you in the gulag boys.
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:52:31 UTC No. 933106
>>929375
>Selling anything which is public domain, including games, as copyrighted material is fraud.
What are you talking about? You can sell public domain material all day long, you can even include PD content as part off your copyrighted work.
You just wouldn't be able to make any claims of infringement on the PD portions if they were copied. What may need to be ruled on is how much human interaction is require for copyright.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Jan 2023 01:55:57 UTC No. 933112
>>932796
this
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Jan 2023 01:59:22 UTC No. 933114
>>933105
ubi = universal basic income
or other meaning in this ai threads?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:46:26 UTC No. 933129
>>928553
Isnt that how it is right now?
Anonymous at Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:36:44 UTC No. 936234
>>929552
top kek
Anonymous at Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:32:39 UTC No. 936241
>>929016
this
AI is bad news for grunt workers.
Basic modeling, lighting, etc done by an AI trained by the industry's most skilled people instead of an army of pajeets who can barely follow tutorials? Fuck yeah, looking forward to that.
Anonymous at Tue, 7 Feb 2023 20:56:32 UTC No. 936284
>>932698
knowledge can absolutely be lost. languages die, the folk tales that weren't passed on or written down are forever gone. art can go that way too - noone will be as good as the people who started drawing before art was demoted to the status of 'fun hobby at best, noone's going to pay you unless you're a celebrity'.
Anonymous at Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:40:28 UTC No. 936607
>>928547
yes, it's naive to think we'll even need humans for anything other than the most mundane physical labor that requires a person to be physically present in the future.
Anonymous at Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:44:46 UTC No. 936608
>>932698
the camera replaced just about every job for a living that required capturing images from reality, you can't make a living doing family portraits anymore.
it's more like the arrival of automated switchboards