Image not available

2503x2047

file.png

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต photoshop VS blender

Anonymous No. 931743

Why is blender the most advanced thing ever ?

Want to make a scale (like the one you have on your ruler).

Blender
>make a cube and use the array modifier on it.

Photoshop/GIMP
>REEEEE you can not do that REEEE make it imprecisely by hand REEEE

Want to make some curves who have XY symmetry at the same time ?

Blender
>Use mirror modifier and turn on XY symmetry on a curve

Photoshop/GIMP
>REEEEE you can not do that REEEE make it imprecisely by hand REEEE

Hey how about sculpting my own drawings ?

Blender
>Here you go

Photoshop/GIMP
>REEEEE you can not do that REEEE make it imprecisely by hand REEEE

Why is photoshop/gimp shit like this ?

Anonymous No. 931759

photoshop/gimp are photo editing software not 3D program, stupid. You just made a cube into a ruler, yes expect something different from a photo editing program. The thing Blender can't do is remove objects from photo, so sorry but photoshop and many other programs can remove objects from photos but not blendr, there goes your so call "most advanced thing" when a basic android smartphone can do it.

Image not available

1279x728

file.png

Anonymous No. 931767

>>931759
>are photo editing software not 3D program
You know you sound exactly like the cancer that are the GIMP devs ?
>Herp derp we will never give shape tools !
>GIMP is a Image Manipulation Program !
>Do it with 8 steps and longer !

>You just made a cube into a ruler,
And you think repeating a 2D layer or shape is not something anyone will ever need in Photoshop ?
Like making a hexagon background in 3 clicks ?

No ?

We need to do it the retarded ways in Photoshop ?

Why ?
>photoshop/gimp are photo editing software not 3D program, stupid
You realize photoshop lets you import 3D objects ?

Anonymous No. 931793

>>931767
This just makes you sound more dumb, people in Photography don't need to learn 3D programs, go on and ask /p/ and graphic design people at /gd/. Learning to make or build shapes is a art thing, what you said is not just for 3D but anywhere that requires it.

There is a thing called automation in adobe and GIMP, what you have in your picture is imperfect, you can never close the gap because Blender lacks the tools for pixel perfect location.

Yes photoshop does import 3D objects but you cant change it without problems. No one is going to edit the model, you can move the bones or for simple terms like babies for you, "moving the character" it's the only thing you can do with 3D objects.

Anonymous No. 931799

>>931793
>your picture is imperfect, you can never close the gap
What did you mean by this ?

Image not available

640x443

bee.png

Anonymous No. 931813

>>931799
Do you really see how you made it uneven, this is how it should look like. No outline, no tricks, just a simple shape into a orderly line.

Image not available

400x285

50142e6d3145f1620....jpg

Anonymous No. 931985

Scalable vector graphics might be what you need.

Anonymous No. 932002

Youre comparing Apples with pears

Anonymous No. 932145

>>932002
he could have presented a stunning work - instead he presents nothing but frantically tries to justify to himself why what he does isn't retarded, even if it is completely unrelated to what he is trying to achieve.

Anonymous No. 932166

>>931743
my coffee machine is better at making coffee than blender, so coffee machines are the most advanced thing ever.

Anonymous No. 933530

I don't know about Photoshop because I've never used it but everything you described can be done in Inkscape.

GIMP is based, your just trying to use it for stuff it's not designed for