Anonymous at Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:18:09 UTC No. 941949

It won't because video cards don't sell themselves. You have to periodically raise the minimum requirements and make your software slower and less useful.

Anonymous at Tue, 4 Apr 2023 03:50:39 UTC No. 941999

>>941949
The 2.8+ performance regression mainly affects the CPU.
GPU performance has if anything increased. But since that's basically just rendering it hardly matters.

Anonymous at Tue, 4 Apr 2023 06:02:19 UTC No. 942003

>>941911
https://github.com/nalexandru/BlenderCompat

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:03:07 UTC No. 942213

>>942003
this guy's doing god's work

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:09:20 UTC No. 942244

>>941911
I'd use Blender 2.79 if the UI was more user-friendly.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:40:11 UTC No. 942246

>>942244
The Blender UI is not user friendly. The difference is that 2.8+ adds nothing of value and it's a lot slower. If your computer can run it at all.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:56:14 UTC No. 942247

>>941911
>no OptiX
>no Eevee
>obsolete NLM denoiser
>no geometry nodes
>no asset browser
>no viewport compositor

Sorry, brah, but I can't.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:37:38 UTC No. 942248

>>942247
no Eevee - it's a plus if you consider that on modern hardware the internal render runs almost realtime and it does that with just the CPU

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 22:17:45 UTC No. 942291

>>941911
This was the last release when texture painting was still functional before Pablo fucked it up and left. Hence a lot of Japanese artists will not go past this version.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Apr 2023 23:20:51 UTC No. 942295

>>942291
link to vtuber?

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Apr 2023 00:48:09 UTC No. 942296

>>942248
the old internal render is based, i wish there was a way to bring it back

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Apr 2023 04:27:52 UTC No. 942311

>>942296
>the old internal render is based
*biased

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Apr 2023 06:17:30 UTC No. 942317

>>942295
Here: https://www.youtube.com/@SaekiYahiro/featured

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Apr 2023 07:05:36 UTC No. 942318

>>942295
Stream: https://www.youtube.com/live/DQjeZ2itfOo?feature=share

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Apr 2023 05:17:06 UTC No. 942433

>>942311
very good anon

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:32:40 UTC No. 942587

>>942291
Can you elaborate? How did it get fucked up? any sources you can provide me with? Even comparisons between 2.79 painting and 3.4-5 would help tremendously

>t. python programmer enthusiast and going to attempt fixing it for modern blender

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:35:17 UTC No. 942637

>>941911
No.