🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Jun 2023 23:10:12 UTC No. 949288
So you AI bros are saying we'll be getting THIS (for 2D) but in 3D - soon? But, the rub is, like in this example, we wont be able to train our own models, so we wont get the styles we want, making it useless?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1n
Anonymous at Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:38:09 UTC No. 949337
Bump for answers
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:26:55 UTC No. 949443
>>949288
I didn't watch the video but txt-2-img will become txt-2-3dmodel. There's also img-2-3dmodel.
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:51:03 UTC No. 949448
>>949443
again, useless without being able to train your own models
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:02:36 UTC No. 949452
oh boy autogenerated stock photos and clip art
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:18:57 UTC No. 949466
>>949448
You will be able to train your own model and the latter won't even require to you.
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:03:12 UTC No. 949483
>>949466
Just like you can in photoshop beta. Oh wait. You really are just making shit up..
Anonymous at Tue, 27 Jun 2023 23:39:48 UTC No. 949550
>>949483
Just like you can with Stable Diffusion or with Nvidia's omniverse.
Anonymous at Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:21:11 UTC No. 949554
>>949550
Stable was a once in a lifetime mistake
Anonymous at Wed, 28 Jun 2023 02:24:19 UTC No. 949562
>>949288
ah yes, it's over, again.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jul 2023 06:45:03 UTC No. 950116
>>949554
Why are you so retarded dude? It will happen again and again.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:55:38 UTC No. 950245
>>949288
fucking lmao with that "check out the shadows!" at 3:28 and right after that he swaps to image with the shadows being completely ruined
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jul 2023 19:22:32 UTC No. 950274
>>949288
notice how every AI discussion is always "will be", never "here is the link".
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jul 2023 23:30:28 UTC No. 950407
>>950274
>here is the link
https://www.adobe.com/
Go nuts.