🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jul 2023 14:43:13 UTC No. 952687
Blender Sirs, we just can't stop winning!
This looks so REAL and LIFELIKE!
Blender is not at all inferior to professional 3d software!
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jul 2023 14:55:34 UTC No. 952688
You mean nothing to the Blender Foundation. You share none of their success and (mostly) failures.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:32:09 UTC No. 952690
I want people to stop pointless brand wars. It doesn't matter what you use. Just make things.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:50:45 UTC No. 952692
Explain that to the jannies who tolerate (maybe even enjoy, or maybe even produce) blatant repeating spam of all sorts.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:04:09 UTC No. 952721
>>952687
Maya did that years ago, it's even in default FX. You didn't win, you just copy other FX of popular 3d software.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:46:56 UTC No. 952874
>>952687
Why do people always use some single rando dude's shit as a benchmark for the capabilities of ANY software?
That's such a fucking retarded way of thinking. If it looks bad it's the lack of skill on the artist's part, not the software.
It's like taking a child's shitty watercolor painting and going
>Checkmate, painters. This painting is SOOOOO GOOOD, you guys are really skilled to pull off something like THIS!
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:13:45 UTC No. 953221
>>952690
I want people to stop bitching about brand wars and just worry about their own shit instead
the chair nerd at Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:15:06 UTC No. 953222
>>953221
Amen.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:16:11 UTC No. 953223
>>952874
because that means the software is capable of said feat you fucking retard. its called a benchmark. try doing that same thing in blender 1.0 if its all artist skill and nothing else
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jul 2023 20:59:09 UTC No. 953267
>>953223
>because that means the software is capable of said feat you fucking retard.
No it doesn't. It just means the dude has the knowledge to do it. It never means that "THIS IS THE ULTIMATE LIMITS OF WHAT THIS SOFTWARE IS CAPABLE OF". That's something hard to quantify, especially from a sample size of one random dude that isn't even close to the foremost expert on it.
>try doing that same thing in blender 1.0 if its all artist skill and nothing else
We're talking about equivalents here for comparison. And older piece of software wouldn't be able to do something the newer version of it can (otherwise there'd just be one version and nothing else). But two softwares from the same time period can be pitted against one another. The argument is about which software available now is better, not whether a current one can outperform a very old one.
Instead of comparing something that are seen as close matches like the Mitsubishi Evo and a Subaru Impreza. Your argument would be like comparing horses and cars.
>Let's see you go 150mph on a horse then retard, if it's all the driver's skill.
I'll admit that the overall argument of mine is more of a contemporary thing, since the softwares available now are comparable and closely matched, and that older softwares in their infancy obviously would have drastic differences between each other and what they could do. Hell, I'll even agree that during those times the comparison from a single dude's benchmark would be valid (say one software was already at bump mapping and the other couldn't even render solid objects).
These days though? Fuck nah. There's so many tools at ones disposal using these softwares that anyone is capable of doing anything if they have the skill to do it. So using someone's shitty project as an example of its capabilities, is once again, retarded.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:54:15 UTC No. 953392
>>952687
I remember that video from 2005 YouTube
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Aug 2023 08:51:36 UTC No. 954993
>>953221
This
Brand wars is a legitimate and well-established discipline of the Internet Special Olympics.
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:54:11 UTC No. 954998
>>952687
>WHAT I'VE DOOONE!
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 13 Aug 2023 20:14:47 UTC No. 955038
>>955031
that guy is the reason i use maya today instead of blender. when i was getting into 3d, i asked myself if i wanted to spend the next couple years watching shitty tutorials by youtube goofs like that and i said nope and installed maya.
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Aug 2023 10:59:20 UTC No. 955740
Let's be real. The reason "Blender" is not (and never will be) a program used by professionals is that you simply cannot make anything looking even remotely good with it.
Look at the attached picture. Blender-losers think this is indistinguishable from reality. LMAO.
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:34:29 UTC No. 956074
blender is 4 the poors
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:50:20 UTC No. 956076
>>955740
Name one thing in 3ds max or maya that could help you make this image better.
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:18:48 UTC No. 956083
>>956076
Actual glass control of the look, better lighting control and reflection
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Aug 2023 01:31:25 UTC No. 956093
>>955740
It's clearly a stylized image. Not sure why you think it's reaching for realism. It's not unrealistic because of the reflections. it's unrealistic because the thickness of the glass is a lot thicker than what you would normally see from a white glass or a wine bottle. If you wanted a realistic glass, then you can just model it thinner, and it would look realistic.
>>956083
That doesn't look realistic either. When you apply a critical eye to it, it clearly looks 3d rendered.
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:43:57 UTC No. 956100
>>956093
Excuses, excuses, all the time blender users making excuses. You said how it could help. Blender lacks any powerful lighting tools like Maya/3Ds and blender glass will always be a kids toy texture. There is no way around it.
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Aug 2023 16:31:28 UTC No. 956432
Thanks for making this thread, none of us value our time, else we wouldn't be here.
Anonymous at Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:32:50 UTC No. 956683
>>956432
people who value their time obviously don't use free software, such as for example blender
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Sep 2023 19:05:17 UTC No. 957481
>>956190
but this crap is late 90s / early 2000s tier
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Sep 2023 22:56:52 UTC No. 958525
>>956683
>blender is only free if your time has no value
~cicero
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:29:07 UTC No. 958702
>>952687
Ha. Joke's on you. Nuke footage has been fake composited hollywood bullshit since day one, much of it filmed at that military base in Laurel Canyon. Nothing real about it. All fear-mongering. (That creepy Jew hack-actor, Jared Leto, now lives in pic-related.)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:42:51 UTC No. 958848
>>953267
didn't read lol
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Sep 2023 19:27:38 UTC No. 959120
>>952690
i want people to stop bitching about the bitching
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Sep 2023 21:20:19 UTC No. 959568
>>952688
I own Blender under the GPL. You own nothing under your serf agreement to some publicly traded company who will squeeze you like the paypig you are. Your interests are not aligned, you are cattle for the proprietor. I am sovereign, you are a slave.
Anonymous at Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:56:22 UTC No. 959961
>>959568
>I own Blender under the GPL
GPL is the ultimate "le eat ze bugz own nothing" loicence, lmao.
And that's what blender basically is. Nothing.
Lol.
Anonymous at Sat, 30 Sep 2023 05:14:28 UTC No. 959991
>>959961
Beyond retarded.
Anonymous at Sun, 1 Oct 2023 07:11:12 UTC No. 960092
>>959991
can freetards go one minute without coping? I don't think so.
maybe take a loan and try some real software, how about that?
Anonymous at Sun, 1 Oct 2023 07:40:15 UTC No. 960096
>>960092
>take a loan to rent a license
Like I said, beyond retarded.
Anonymous at Sun, 1 Oct 2023 14:57:05 UTC No. 960112
>>959961
To call what threatens you 'nothing' is the ultimate form of denial.
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Oct 2023 00:47:31 UTC No. 960144
>>960123
GPLvSOUL
Anonymous at Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:18:57 UTC No. 960166
Anonymous at Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:36:59 UTC No. 960223
>>959568
Oh that's cool. So why aren't you coding in all the features maya has? You have the GPL, why aren't you adding everything you want to it?
Anonymous at Tue, 3 Oct 2023 20:23:20 UTC No. 960259
>>960223
I only add features I want, like altering texture baking behavior. You can add the features you want, but in actual reality you're some disposable artfag who probably fail to even correctly setup a build environment.
We are not the same, you are slave and I am sovereign. I do whatever I want whenever I want while you are incapable, not just technically but spiritually.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:17:08 UTC No. 961099
I saw a homeless man yesterday, he was using Blender on his GNU+Linux laptop.
Anonymous at Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:43:38 UTC No. 962102
>>961099
Was me ggs
Neighbors wifi btw, + stolen laptop = free entertainment
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Nov 2023 13:16:27 UTC No. 963136
>>962102
>Neighbors wifi btw, + stolen laptop
this is your brain on free software
Anonymous at Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:58:14 UTC No. 964485
>>960123
this is what blender was made for