🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 5 Aug 2023 00:03:25 UTC No. 954236
Ziva 2.2 now has a GPU solver. It is OVER!!!!! Holy shit it is so over!!!!
Thoughts?
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:43:14 UTC No. 954578
>>954236
what, or who's over? fucking retard.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:15:18 UTC No. 954593
>>954578
>t. clueless blender idiot
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:22:38 UTC No. 954596
>>954593
Anon, You made retardefd take, with no explanation what is OVER and what You think on the matter, You just want to stirr shit up without even understanding what You are posting. Stop being retarded and articulate Your thoughts better than a zoomer who learned new word.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:59:17 UTC No. 954600
>>954236
can't afford Maya or Ziva
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Aug 2023 06:22:20 UTC No. 954665
how much faster is it compared to the cpu solvers? are there any benchmarks provided?
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:52:24 UTC No. 954679
>>954665
They claim 2x to 5x its a big complex scene depending on cuda cores. There is a benchmark graph, it is on the low end, only a 2080 super but it destroys a hugely expensive threadripper, a 3955wx.
https://zivadynamics.com/resources/
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:34 UTC No. 955277
I've always wanted to work with a good FEM solver. The one in houdini isn't really that performant and doesn't work with muscles and fat in my experience. PhysX has an FEM solver integrated into omniverse and I wonder how these 2 compare. I don't have an RTX card or a ziva subscription, unfortunately.