Anonymous at Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:13:28 UTC No. 963533

>>963530
What are you doing, simulations in Houdini or something?

Anonymous at Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:18:36 UTC No. 963534

>>963533
simulations

Anonymous at Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:20:58 UTC No. 963535

>>963534
Yeah, makes sense. Even then I was under the impression that 128GB was a safe amount for most things.

Anonymous at Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:44:52 UTC No. 963536

>>963535
what I wanted to do is possible, but only on a quantum computer, it turns out

Anonymous at Tue, 7 Nov 2023 18:55:24 UTC No. 963538

>128gb on CPU

is that your L1 or L2 cache?

Anonymous at Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:13:41 UTC No. 963565

>>963536
what exactly were you trying to do?

Anonymous at Wed, 8 Nov 2023 01:14:19 UTC No. 963569

>>963538
Lawl, go easy on anon, he meant main memory. If CPUs had that much cache we wouldn’t need GPUs at all