Image not available

480x371

1691561172276656.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 967659

What is your experience with Karma renderer?

Anonymous No. 967686

>>967659
slower than commercial renderers and just as limited, despite sidefx' claims of it going ""gold"" (it isn't)
for example, they skirted around the fact it couldn't render volumes in xpu mode by making it able to render them exclusively through one, extremely limited volume shader that it's literally just for previewing smoke, and then called it Feature Complete****

basically the equivalent of using alpha transparency and claiming it can render glass.
if only mantra wasn't such a fucking unbearable slog...

Anonymous No. 967687

>>967686
So you what do you suggest - taking the maxon blackpill and using redshift?

Anonymous No. 967691

>>967659
I am a really shitty human being so I don't want to try it just in case...

Anonymous No. 967695

>>967687
unironically what I do, but I have a legacy perm license from before the maxon jewery. and yet, it's still going to expire next summer and won't be able to renew it.
if I didn't have that, I wouldn't know. once that's also over, it'll probably be good for a few more months, but I'm unironically hoping and coping karma will get better by then. amongst 3d software companies, sidefx is the only one who could actually pull it off and that's saying something. fuck giving money to the germs at maxon, ever.

Anonymous No. 967697

>>967695
I have to agree, that shit burns

Anonymous No. 967741

>>967686
what are the limitations of H20 Karma XPU uniform volume?

Anonymous No. 967745

>>967695
lmao the naive outtake on filmmaking to begin with