Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:11:26 UTC No. 969111

>>969110
A thread died for this

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:40:03 UTC No. 969113

>>969111
t. blender user since 2005, still making the same tired old static objects and wondering why he or she never gets work

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:49:33 UTC No. 969114

>>969113
If that makes you happy bro

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:50:55 UTC No. 969115

>>969114
i was describing your perspective, bro. That's what "t." means

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:52:46 UTC No. 969116

>>969115
If that makes you happy lil bro

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:54:26 UTC No. 969117

>>969116
Why are you so passive aggressive? You got called out, you have no comeback, and yet you want to be industry? You are a static model, architecture machine only.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:56:12 UTC No. 969118

>>969117
If that makes you happy my guy

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:58:53 UTC No. 969119

>>969118
It doesn't.

I can only be happy when you blender people defend your stance

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:01:52 UTC No. 969120

I thought so

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 17:28:38 UTC No. 969127

>>969110
Please post a nice example of something made using Vellum. Doesn't have to be your work.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 17:43:04 UTC No. 969128

>>969127
high likelihood that every cloth and hair sim you've seen in film/tv/advertising for the last 4 years was done with vellum. unironically industry standard.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 17:53:22 UTC No. 969130

>>969128
almost every muscle sim is done with vellum too

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:07:46 UTC No. 969132

blender has that node simulation thing that they added a couple of months ago, as long as they don't need it for the next open """movie""" they aren't working more on that.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:17:38 UTC No. 969134

>>969132
i think they'll add some sort of xpbd support by 5.0. even maxon managed to do it for the new c4d and they're somehow more retarded than blender devs.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:19:00 UTC No. 969135

>>969132
You mean Simulation Nodes? Yeah, that stuff isn't going to get you very far at all.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:49:51 UTC No. 969139

Is 90% of this board just copers crying about blender or is 90% being too generous?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 18:53:35 UTC No. 969140

>>969139
its Blenders birthday today dumbass. Its fucking 30. No vellum, no live mirrored component selection.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 19:19:37 UTC No. 969143

>>969140
>No vellum, no live mirrored component selection
Oh no, anyway

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 19:28:31 UTC No. 969145

>>969143
can you even comprehend how needed vellum is? Can you even comprehend how late to the party blender is?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 19:31:46 UTC No. 969146

>>969145
Post vellum tutorial pls

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 19:34:25 UTC No. 969147

>>969145
>can you even comprehend how needed vellum is?
Don't care + didn't ask, never needed to even know tf it is still make a bank from 3d.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 20:09:32 UTC No. 969149

>>969147
get out of the vellum thread for blender then you literal retard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 20:43:26 UTC No. 969152

>>969110
>Blender doesn't have X
>No mention what X is
OP is a faggot

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:13:39 UTC No. 969156

>>969149
Blender doesn't have vellum retard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:30:34 UTC No. 969159

>>969156
reading comprehension, esl

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:38:42 UTC No. 969161

>>969159
Kys retardo blendfag

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:43:04 UTC No. 969162

>>969161
Its blenders birthday today!!

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:43:23 UTC No. 969175

>>969110
I have no idea what vellum is, and I'm not going to google to figure it out.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:49:24 UTC No. 969176

>>969175
retard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:51:09 UTC No. 969177

>>969176
Use your words, autist, and actually state what it is. Then maybe, MAYBE I'll look into it.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:53:36 UTC No. 969179

>>969177
you're pathetic

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:54:18 UTC No. 969180

>>969179
Thought so. You just want to talk shit.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:57:42 UTC No. 969181

>>969180
wow you retard, you can read this very thread and find out what it is. You will never make it

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:02:34 UTC No. 969185

>>969181
>You will never make it
Yes, I will never make the purchase to Houdini. You're right.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:04:22 UTC No. 969186

>>969185
you can literally get houdini for free you drooling retard

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:06:43 UTC No. 969187

>>969186
"""Free""" with severely limited features and capabilities. You already tried this shill tactic on me last year, Houdinifag.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:07:59 UTC No. 969188

>>969187
all the necessary features are there, idiot. You dont need anything else

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:10:28 UTC No. 969189

>>969188
Lies, deceit, omissions. Shill tactics to get people on the demo, so from there you can entice them to buy the full thing.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:14:20 UTC No. 969190

>>969189
you are schizo

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:33:25 UTC No. 969192

>>969190
Buy an ad

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:25:31 UTC No. 969199

>>969175
It's calf skin used to make illustrated manuscripts back in the olden days where a bible was worth a family fortune, and everyone fought with swords.