🧵 I'm so fucking sick of all these archviz """gods""" doing nothing but this style of house
Anonymous at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:16:35 UTC No. 975331
This style is the biggest, laziest meme ever. It's even worse than McMansion. Everyone goes ooo and aaahh over a fucking boolean'd rectangular with glass inside.
Anonymous at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:19:05 UTC No. 975332
Rectangular box even!
Anonymous at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:36:56 UTC No. 975339
>>975331
post your work
[spoiler](I'm kidding)[/spoiler]
Anonymous at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:56:09 UTC No. 975343
>>975331
Be the change you want to see instead of complaining like the little bitch you're acting like.
🗑️ the chair nerd at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:18:55 UTC No. 975348
>>975331
>doing nothing but this style of house
I do whatever the client designs dude. If you want to blame someone is architects.
So as an architect. Yes you are right this kind of architecture is fucking awful. But it seems you don't have any objective criticism of this kind of architecture.I bet you also hate comic sans for no objective reason. It is obvious you are just a drone following the latest outrage from /pol/reddit/9gag with 'modern' architecture. Grow a brain anon, stop being a loudspeaker for other's grievances.
Anonymous at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:29:51 UTC No. 975350
>>975348
The houses on top are very probably significantly older than 100 years.
Also what's awful is suburban living in general, not just it's architecture. Doing archviz for rich assholes who will probably die of thirst when the revolution cuts off the water supply to their gated community is something I'd never engage in. I'd rather NEET it out till then.
🗑️ the chair nerd at Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:34:47 UTC No. 975351
>>975350
>Doing archviz for rich assholes who will probably die of thirst when the revolution cuts off the water supply to their gated community is something I'd never engage in.
Ok less competition.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:26:25 UTC No. 975363
>>975348
Wow, you've been modeling for a really long time, anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:36:18 UTC No. 975364
>>975348
I think houses from 2024 are really nice looking, if I wanted to live in sword art online i would choose the cottages
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 01:12:15 UTC No. 975372
>>975348
Obviously the problem is that architects also use CAD tools that are only good at making default cubes and such shit. Just look at how modernist this plane looks, by the way the simulation software used when designing it couldn't handle even one more tri. But it's definitely a stylistic design choice when it comes to those gay ass houses.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 02:03:14 UTC No. 975376
>>975375
Of course it can't you flaming faggot.
https://makertales.gumroad.com/l/CA
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 03:42:09 UTC No. 975380
>>975372
>>975375
Cris, as a general rule, you shouldn't reply to your own posts.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:27:53 UTC No. 975452
>>975380
Fuck you I'll do what I want
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:36:35 UTC No. 975455
>>975376
>Fails to work as a CAD program, lots of missing features that freeCAD offers, inaccurate information, ETC.
Blender will never be CAD approved.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:34:32 UTC No. 975462
>>975331
it is long tail ad revenue bait. post it and next year it will have 150k views and you make 100dollars from it. a decent little side job.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:57:49 UTC No. 975466
>>975455
>Blender will never be CAD approved.
Blender could integrate a cad mode, the problem is that the Blender Studio is not interested on cad, at best they could integrate signed distance fields.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:39:57 UTC No. 975489
>>975466
>Blender could integrate a cad mode
No. Blender lacks support for NURBS surfaces with holes. The whole modern CAD thing revolves around those primitives. Blender will never work as a CAD unless the internals get largely re-written. That's not going to happen.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:13:24 UTC No. 975503
>>975489
I think it supports holes ... yes they want to rewrite all that and to add the FreeCAD libraries, you can read it here, the main problem is that they don't need cad for the Blender studio.
https://projects.blender.org/blende
https://devtalk.blender.org/t/bette
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:00:25 UTC No. 975506
>>975503
>Blender is all in one
>Dev “No, CAD for you”
There goes people’s claims of it being all in one and able to do anything. Big corp would totally switch to blender if CAD was on it.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:53:37 UTC No. 975509
>>975503
The specific primitive that you need need is a NURB but you also need to be able to add a number of 2D cutters to it which may overlap and span across several NURBS.
Those "2D cutters" are the "sketches" which are the actual CAD drawings. Those in turn need to support linear and angular constraints and so on.
Blender has maybe 5% of the functionality that you would need to make a CAD and that's too little to be extended of fixed via Python scripts.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:09:10 UTC No. 975512
>>975503
For reference:
https://registry.khronos.org/OpenGL
Red the part that says: "gluBeginTrim/gluEndTrim pair, it is used to describe a trimming curve". That's the part that's missing in Blender and all the functions related to producing and editing those "trimming curves" of course.
Anonymous at Sat, 24 Feb 2024 22:12:48 UTC No. 975534
>>975372
Maybe it's been a while and I forgot, but I'm pretty sure that plane wasn't made using 3d design, but drafted by hand. The angles were definitely simulated for radar bounceback, but the shape was because they had to "make it by hand" and complex curves were either hard to simulate or make to the specifications.
Which is why the B2 has all kinds of really smooth curves.
Then again, I could be completely fucking wrong, and I'm mis-remembering things, or just made it up in my head. I swear I heard that shit on Modern Marvels 12+ years ago though.
In hindsight, I guess I kind of just repeated what you said, just in a different way.
🗑️ the chair nerd at Sun, 25 Feb 2024 03:47:59 UTC No. 975585
>>975363
small kek
>>975364
You do you. I prefer vernacular architecture. I've modeled and designed houses of all tastes and styles and my honest professional opinion is that us architects are overvalued.
>>975372
>Obviously the problem is that architects also use CAD tools that are only good at making default cubes and such shit
Do you know them all? Are you sure they all use CAD tools? Have you even opened an architecture journal?
> Just look at how modernist this plane looks
Modernist like the modernist movement from the 1920's? Modernist like the 3rd international? Modernist like the burtalists or the futurists? Do you even know waht modernist means? Do you even know what the flying fuck you are talking about?
>by the way the simulation software used when designing it couldn't handle even one more tri.
LOOK EVERYONE I ALSO WATCHED DISCOVERY CHANNEL WHEN I WAS A KID.
>But it's definitely a stylistic design choice when it comes to those gay ass houses.
Unfortunately anon. Even with your idiotic comment, your blatant ignorance You are absolutely right. It is a stylistic choice, not a good one, not a cogent one but a choice. Thank you for letting us know you think those houses look gay. Pretty insightful I must say.
Anonymous at Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:04:12 UTC No. 975865
>>975466
>Blender could integrate a cad mode
For true CAD Blender lacks the precision and its polygon engine is completely unfit for CAD in general.
Anonymous at Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:27:06 UTC No. 975873
Man, all this talk about CAD, I just wanna be able to use NURBS to make cars and sweeping organic surface shit like Max. That shit looks so nice to use for that case. Not nice enough to completely swap over to Max, but enough to get a bit frustrated at the Blender devs for implmenting such an eighth-assed feature (because "half-assed" would be giving them too much credit). They got to the point where they could display NURBS surfaces, and just stopped there. "Yup, that's a wrap people".
Anonymous at Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:13:57 UTC No. 975936
>>975897
Not even Chair anon, but I wouldn't sit in any of those. The chairs especially. Holy shit it's just asking for back pain.
the chair nerd at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:56:36 UTC No. 976785
>>975897
Those are marble stools there are many providers of those. Dining seating are Suit Chairs made by Artifort and go for $1500 euro a pop. They are fucking disgusting but pretty confortable.
the chair nerd at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:59:27 UTC No. 976787
>>975936
In my humble opinion.. yeah not worth it.
the chair nerd at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:19:44 UTC No. 978219
>>978217
Unfortunately yes.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:26:08 UTC No. 978284
>>978217
I just want to slide my knob over that dome.