Image not available

807x450

a.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 976502

how can i recreate 90s style 3d renders in modern blender? i know i could just learn bryce3d but i don't want to. ive heard eevee has phong shading but i can't find it.

Anonymous No. 976506

>>976502
I was a sperm not giving a fuck about existence before I barreled into the egg like a fucking asshole and have suffered ever since

Anonymous No. 976512

>>976502
>what is 3dmax scanline render?

Anonymous No. 976537

>>976502
>i know i could just learn bryce3d
I'm sorry for the meme answer but unironically just learn bryce3d, it's the easiest software I've ever learned and it was made for literal children to fuck around in, you should be able to start creating shit you want in one evening

Anonymous No. 976540

>>976537
>>976502
Blender and bryce3d wonโ€™t ever get the results you wanted. Both software lack the rendering capabilities necessary to produce the bad rendering results.

Anonymous No. 976579

>>976540
>rendering capabilities necessary
>to produce the bad rendering results

Anonymous No. 976600

>>976540
bryce3d is unironically deep as fuck. you got filtered

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 976618

Since their rendering engine has hardly changed since the 90s just use basically any version of 3DS MAX, preferably an older one. It's basically SOVL right out of the box.

Image not available

1925x1442

1704840146921304.png

Anonymous No. 976619

Since their rendering engine has hardly changed since the 90s just use basically any version of 3DS MAX, preferably an older one. It's basically SOVL right out of the box.

Anonymous No. 976875

>>976502
>this fucking thread again
Why don't we get the "software purist" in here while we're at it?

Anonymous No. 976876

>>976502
Code up your own engine in OpenGL at this point. There's tutorials online

Anonymous No. 976889

>>976619
This was the second one I ever used, after Sculpt Animate on Amiga.

Anonymous No. 977861

>>976502
Lmao can't belive this software (Seamless 3D) still being updated noawadays. You should check it.
https://www.seamless3d.com/

Anonymous No. 977905

>>976876
Realtime OpenGL graphics won't give you that 90s prerendered look.

Anonymous No. 977908

>>976502
Quick googling says the image has been created with povray.
Just use that, it still works on modern computers.
You can also use it to render scenes you've made in blender.
https://wiki.povray.org/content/HowTo:Use_POV-Ray_with_Blender

That will give you exactly the same look (given you learn to use povray)

Anonymous No. 977978

>>977861
the autist is still on it for almost 2 decades now. he's like cris but actually based AND have a working product that he could be proud of.

Anonymous No. 978684

>>977908
Not OP but povray is my next focus. Got filtered by the blender add on version so just going to try it stand alone for now.

Anonymous No. 978840

>>976502
A lot of that classic 90's style is the lack of modern tone mapping. Modern Blender uses some kind of filmic tonemapper (filmic blender, ApX, ACES all do this) which desaturates highlights. Classic graphics don't do this which leads to that unique "fake" look.
You should be able to achieve this look pretty much entirely in the Compositor, using "convert color space" nodes.

Anonymous No. 978843

>>978840
this.
old cg doesnt gives a fuck about correct gamma calculation. also its the reason why constant ambient light is needed to "correct" the midtones.

Image not available

960x1080

file.png

Anonymous No. 978851

>>978843
It's even easier than messing around in Compositor. Literally just setting the View Transform in the Color Management to "Raw" will do it. You don't even need to re-render, either, since tonemappers themselves use Raw data when they adjust colors.
It really is amazing how effective tonemapping is at selling compelling lighting. I've only been dabbling in 3D for the past week or so but I've been doing color-managed digital art for a while, now, and it's just as effective there as it is here, while allowing for comparatively simple Multiplicative shading setups, now unlike that of a deferred lighting engine.

Anonymous No. 980297

>>976502
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8A8jwE_AB0

Anonymous No. 981283

>>980297
You will not get good results using this

Anonymous No. 981292

>>981283
this

Anonymous No. 984538

>>977861
>>977978
I admire the dedication. This is the type of autism that is needed