Image not available

2031x1727

a75hhhzn.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 977059

Ok, /3/. What do I do next?

Image not available

661x969

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 977081

I will try tomorrow. I do not really remember any Blender controls. Can someone explain Chris meme to me? I want to be a part of /3/ wonderful community...

Image not available

1280x1920

Screenshot_202403....png

Anonymous No. 977086

>>977059
>>977081
If I use these settings like in the pixel, will blensere generate your image?

Anonymous No. 977087

>>977086
*picrel
*blender

Anonymous No. 977091

>alright i set uo my image planes....ill oick it back up tomorrow
And then he never did.
Blocking out a figure takes less time than it took you to find your porn folder in the image selection window.

Anonymous No. 977093

>>977059
I might give you advice, but you have to promise me that you will stop being a pedophile.

Anonymous No. 977100

>>977086
jesse

Anonymous No. 977106

Why model a pre-puberty child tho?

Anonymous No. 977108

>>977059
burn all your electronics, then find jesus or whatever

Image not available

1387x830

m.jpg

Anonymous No. 977115

>>977081
get the overall proportion first with simple geometry
then you go rounding the shape in the process

Image not available

5400x2681

CrisMeme.jpg

Anonymous No. 977130

>>977059
Very erotic loli.

>>977081
A notorious schizo. Do not engage. Also his name is Cris.

Image not available

2129x1207

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 977150

Here is my first model I have done some time ago. It was super easy having all the limbs separated and does not look that bad for game prototype purposes. I want to do Tabako-san properly.

What is the common approach to the limbs? Are they created separately and then joined to torso, or are they done like I am doing on the right? Joining two objects with vertices seems rather difficult. I guess it does not matter when you are sculpting, and then do retopology, because the result will be a single mesh?

Maybe I should have just added cylinders for each part and try to connect them... or just fuck off and watch a tutorial.

>>977086
Anon.. what?
>>977091
It was midnight! And I've got distracted by my friend's anime stream. I am back and will try to make something out of her.
>>977106
I envisioned a game set in rural Europe about infertile race of hebe witches. The goal is to make them fertile, hehe.
>>977108
No can do.. wish that was not the case, sincerely.
>>977115
Thank you!
>>977130
She is super cute, the source is Madogiwa no Tabako-san.

Anonymous No. 977152

>>977150
Awful, you are clueless

Anonymous No. 977153

>>977152
That's absolutely true, lol. What standard should I hold myself up to as a literal first timer?

Anonymous No. 977154

>>977153
By getting rid of blender has its the worst 3D software in existence. If you’re going to learn how to make bodies at least sculpt it first. You learn more from sculpting than building the body by blocks.

Anonymous No. 977159

>>977154
You are right, downloading Blockbench this instant.

Anonymous No. 977160

>>977159
Jesus you are such an insecure fag, ngmi

Anonymous No. 977161

>>977160
Sorry, maybe this is more your speed.

You are right, downloading Blockbench this instant. /s

Anonymous No. 977164

>>977161
Retard

Anonymous No. 977166

>>977059
Tabaco uoohh

Anonymous No. 977198

OP here.. I tried and failed. Did not do anything I liked. I will try following a proper tutorial first.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvgIVNDU-Dxi5h3JLNJMfK0t3-WsBm6Av

Anonymous No. 977201

>>977152
>>977154
>>977160
>>977160
>>977164
Why do you insist on trying to make sure this board stays dead? What's in it for you?

Anonymous No. 977227

>>977201
Oh no! I was slightly mean to a pedo with no eye for forms that will clearly never make it, golly gosh i killed this board :(((

Anonymous No. 977228

>>977227
Except for every other thread you ruin. Forgot to include those :^)
Nice strawman though!!!!

Anonymous No. 977230

>>977228
Oh my bad I didn't realise you were a schizo

Anonymous No. 977231

>>977198
Keep it up, you'll get the hang of it

Anonymous No. 977232

>>977115
That method would be in any way useful only if you're using that as a basis for sculpting. It would not be easy to convert what you cdreated into useful topology.

>>977150
Most people model limbs separately. You can connect them together by remeshing it, or you can just cut holes into them and connect them vertex by vertex. E.g., cull the leg a little bit to get a round faceless boundary, and then cut a hole into the torso so that it has a boundary with equally many vertices as the boundary of the leg. Then just connect the edge loops.

>>977227
I agree with the other anon. You should definitely just shut up.

Image not available

1180x2388

box.jpg

Anonymous No. 977236

>>977232
shut up if you dont dont know box modeling.
guilty gear models was done this way.

Anonymous No. 977239

>>977236
Box modelling is fine, when you know what you're doing. You do not. Your topology is useless.

Anonymous No. 977240

>>977239
you dont know box modeling shut up.

Image not available

1033x829

box.jpg

Anonymous No. 977243

>>977240
here is my loli im working on i started just like that
i will do the fingers and toes next

Anonymous No. 977247

>>977236
>guilty gear models was done this way.
Why do retards like you always bring up GG like it was some group effort and crowning 3d achievement that you took part in? It's like trannies and autists "claiming" famous people just because they show a single quirk that's commonly associated with their disabilities.

What one studio/person does doesn't give you credibility, it gives THEM credibility. Just because something works for them and their workflow that they developed for their project, doesn't mean it's applicable to all projects.

Anonymous No. 977248

>>977247
>It's like trannies and autists
ironic too, considering that's the majority of guilty gears playerbase

Anonymous No. 977256

>>977247
box modeling is not a guilty gear thing, you imbecile

Anonymous No. 977277

>>977256
>box modeling is not a guilty gear thing, you imbecile
Tell that to this guy >>977236

Image not available

2059x1669

1709457375806771.jpg

Anonymous No. 977309

>>977150
Thank you

Anonymous No. 977323

>>977243
show wires so i can steal it

Anonymous No. 977324

>>977243
Why does it look like you stolen a model and assumed we wouldn’t know. It doesn’t match with your current knowledge of how you modeled your characters.

Image not available

922x593

subdivided box.png

Anonymous No. 977335

>>977150
I'm a fan of box modelling. when you box model, you can begin very simply like this anon does: >>977115 It might not seem right to actually go with boxes at first, they're so rigid and angular. But think about it... what is a cylinder but a subdivided box?(pic related)

As long as your basic boxes are connected properly, then you can just subdivide to add more geometry. Using the subdivide modifier, you can see what your model looks like subdivided, without harming the basic boxes you constructed.

But it's likely that you want more control over the shape of you model than mere boxes. Well that's easy to do. Just add "loopcuts". While in edit mode, press Ctrl+R, and hover over the geometry you want to "cut".(they call it cutting, but it's actually dividing faces in half.) The loop cut tool will automatically calculate a route through the faces of your geometry. It knows where to go, because the faces are all cleanly aligned, unless you fucked up somehow.
The example this anon gave >>977115 is pretty good. But there are a number of decisions they made that would create trouble with loop cuts.

But in any case, with box modelling, you can connect simple shapes at the joints to make sure they're all connected properly, and then add as many loop cuts as you think is necessary to round the figure out. Because the boxes were all connected cleanly, the loopcuts will be clean too.

It will take some exercise to get used to the process. But once you get it, box modelling is pretty easy, and gives you a ton of control. It boils down to just laying out connecting zones, and then bridging edges in between.

Image not available

720x680

1703906583886991.webm

Anonymous No. 977390

>>977335
Thanks for taking time to post this, very much appreciated!

Anonymous No. 977402

Keep it up anon, the market for sexy little girls/teenage is there if you're into it.

You're better than me for already starting...

Image not available

4961x7016

Box.jpg

Anonymous No. 977419

>>977059

Anonymous No. 977423

>>977390
>Making something this cute without anatomy knowledge
h-hey, you're not allowed to do that

Anonymous No. 977424

>>977419
I'm usually pretty easily impressed by 3d models but this doesn't look very good imo

Image not available

1370x983

Figure.jpg

Anonymous No. 977441

>>977424
Isn't this what op asked for? What else do you want.

Anonymous No. 977446

>>977441
Okay I admit that looks pretty great.

Anonymous No. 977461

>>977419
>>977441
ah that technique for making hands isn't good, and you can see in the final mesh the hands still have the boxiness of the original...boxes.
It's better to make all the parts of the hand, position them correctly, and then connect them. The curve of the palm will emerge automatically.
Trying to extrude out hands from the wrists always sounds like a good idea but you can never get rid of that box shape, and everyone in the world is a veritable expert in what hands look like.

Image not available

1914x1074

wordsofamaster.jpg

Anonymous No. 977475

Image not available

1914x1074

woam.jpg

Anonymous No. 977485

>>977239

Anonymous No. 977518

>>977419
>>977441
is that the same model? Doesnt look like it desu

Anonymous No. 977525

>>977419
>>977485
Now i see your mistakes, because you never care enough about wiring, the model itself becomes useless when moving around. You just created a poster.

Anonymous No. 977556

>>977525
Yeah the primary advantage of box modelling over sculpting is laying the ground work for good topo from the beginning. If you don't mind retopo, or even "like" to do it, though. Then w/e. You're just doing more work to give yourself more work.

Anonymous No. 977574

>>977556
All you did was put the ingredients into the bowl and bake the cake without structuring into a circle bowl. That’s what you did. We build sound wiring so nothing bad happens during animation takes. The human body isn’t built like that at all, there’s clear signs it will deformed into a mess.

This whole “It takes a lit longer” sounds like Bullshit talk from amateur CGI blender artist. They don’t have experience or knowledge, what’s a house if you build it entirely of triangles, a very angry customer.

Anonymous No. 977602

>>977574
I'm not the OP and you may have noticed that my use of the word "yeah" was me agreeing with you.