🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 13:56:41 UTC No. 983192
What does /3/ think about the Metalheart aesthetic?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 14:34:22 UTC No. 983197
>metalheart
it's called depthcore, zoomie
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 15:35:10 UTC No. 983199
>>983197
'metalheart' predates depthcore as label for that look, now you're the zoomie.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 16:21:28 UTC No. 983207
>>983199
>Using Fandom as a reliable source
Clearly only idiots believe in their AI junk. It’s called metallic.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 16:27:19 UTC No. 983208
both look like shit sorry
why do you even care about -core shit make something of your own
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 19:40:39 UTC No. 983216
>>983197
This shit never had a name, at best they were called cancer explosions.
>>983192
I miss it, I'd go searching for old tutorials on how to make it on Deviantart if the site wasn't so infested with A.I.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 00:51:09 UTC No. 983243
>>983192
this looks like I'd see it on the album cover of an obscure european power metal band that was somewhat popular in the early 00s and has like three songs that are somewhat listenable that I'd add to my spotify playlist before spotify takes them down after a week for no damn reason then brings them back 5 years later and I listen to them and think 'oh i remember these guys' then remove them from the playlist because they no longer fit the overall vibe I'm trying to curate.
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 04:55:11 UTC No. 984216
>>983192
archeological site for internet """""historians"":
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http:
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:00:34 UTC No. 984219
2 decades ago it looked like tryhard 3D noob stuff and it still does. basically it was the early 00s donut but visually "interesting" enough to impress people who're not familiar with working with 3D software
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 16:11:56 UTC No. 984262
>>984215
>blender can't make this kind of art!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LE
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:30:50 UTC No. 984302
>>984262
>2023 zoomer tryna emulate 2000 soul
literally, figuratively, and unironically forced soul.
its not just about soul either. blender's rendering just cant match the crispiness and the cleanliness of 3ds max scanline render. its not a placebo thing, theres a real algorithmic difference between bucket based vs scanline based render.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:19:31 UTC No. 984489
>>983216
>I miss it, I'd go searching for old tutorials on how to make it on Deviantart if the site wasn't so infested with A.I.
Use google image search and append "before:2022" at the end. That helps me get to the older stuff
Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 04:29:56 UTC No. 984536
>>983216
It's not too awful. If you have an account you could filter out ai, midjourney, dall-e and the like in the Muted Tags setting.
>they can just not tag
Most of them don't tag for shit so it won't pop up in a search in the first place. A bulk of the uploads have a generic title or number and absolutely no description either
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:36:40 UTC No. 988128
>>983192
it's good
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:21:13 UTC No. 988134
>>983192
I like this, but that could just be nostalgia.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:12:34 UTC No. 988152
>>983192
it reminds me of my childhood so I don't like it
even without factoring in my father beating me Matrix gave me nightmares
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:47:41 UTC No. 989040
>>983192
Reminds me of 2007.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 03:22:35 UTC No. 989085
>>983192
Would be kino if it weren't just random shapes. To me an aesthetic is something that is applied to a shape or concept, not the shape/concept itself. So the early 2000's sci fi cool colors, the simulated scan lines, flowing lines, reflective surfaces, etc. to me are an aesthetic, whereas the random shapes are not.