Image not available

615x616

1708724115008.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16041952

Which AI is the smartest?

Anonymous No. 16042004

>>16041952
The one the government is running.

Image not available

1904x1015

language police.png

Anonymous No. 16042036

>>16042004
We're living in a clown world.

Image not available

692x1145

1695854804534.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16042286

google is just following a preexisting popular trend

Anonymous No. 16042287

>stuff requires ai(robotics)
>The entire project must be about an ai that thinks black people are monkeys
It's all so tiresome

Anonymous No. 16042297

>>16042287
Youre gonna see it everywhere too because now every retard suddenly has some snarky one liner to say about AI instead of shitting their pants at this unprecedented world changing technology like they were before.

Anonymous No. 16042326

>>16041952
>>>/g/

Anonymous No. 16042638

>>16042036
>Yox, multinaries or non-naries, I am a genetic donator to my human slave property but more often I feel like the human slave property when around my warden of legal bondage
>anyways back to the most effective way to extract adrenochrome from border children... I mean temporally recent undocumented asylum seekers

Anonymous No. 16042646

resist ai

Image not available

768x1166

Data _Is_Racist_2.png

Anonymous No. 16042863

>>16041952
>Which AI is the smartest?

The AI is not the problem it is the people feeding the information. One group has meetings about pronouns and how many genders there are. That group wants the AI to reflect the world as they see it.
For them data is racist.
The other group wants the AI to reflect the truth.

Image not available

1125x1727

2hvvgu.jpg

Anonymous No. 16043117

Anonymous No. 16043165

>>16043117
Did you bring up that screenshot to refute the OP's argument?

If the request was to draw a picture of the British king eating watermelon, it should naturally depict a white person eating watermelon, which aligns with historical facts.

However, due to the racially discriminatory association between watermelon and Black people learned by AI, the act of drawing the British king as Black constitutes a distortion of truth.

Image not available

2048x1434

4pv.jpg

Anonymous No. 16043630

Anonymous No. 16044729

>>16042286
imagine how much labeling negro criminals as white alters the national racial crime statistics

Image not available

680x768

qGi5.jpg

Anonymous No. 16044990

Anonymous No. 16045788

>>16041952
Theres no such thing as "AI" giving software a meme name doesn't make it intelligent.

Image not available

568x333

0ZT.jpg

Anonymous No. 16046502

Image not available

1280x720

3175225038.jpg

Anonymous No. 16046522

I think they'll make the chatbots answer just like google shows search results. highly depends on who's asking. they'll figure out how to tell you what you need to hear.

Anonymous No. 16046577

>>16045788
Being a contrarian doesn't actually make the words mean something else, if an AI is better at making recommendations and citing facts than most people, they will conclude it is intelligent by definition.

Anonymous No. 16046582

>>16045788
>Theres no such thing as "AI"
I mean what do you actually think you are? It will surpass our average "us", in creativity. We're just monkeys throwing shit at the wall and we see what sticks. "AI" will eventually do it better/faster, and thus be more "intelligent"

Anonymous No. 16046604

>LLM
>AI
Interpolation does not make an algorithm 'intelligent', decision trees, wether implicitly learnt or built-in, do. True AI lies in reinforcement learning, and actually solve real, nontrivial problems. RL algos such as alphazero (originally made to master games), have achieved SOTA results for video compression and matrix multiplication as well as successful applications in nuclear control systems, quantum field theory and robotics. OpenAI may have the bigger dataset, but Deepmind's family of 'alphazero' algos is where it's at.

Anonymous No. 16047588

>>16041952
>musk is le based
He's on team technocrat who want to ultimately control you like bio-robots.

Image not available

632x790

uaPgT.png

Anonymous No. 16047717

Anonymous No. 16047742

>>16041952
claude is most consistent, in my experience

Anonymous No. 16047761

Are the brand spanking new AI cores/silicon just really a pullback to the 60s-70s tape computers in series, in terms of design? Why didn't we just run AI models 20 years ago?

Anonymous No. 16047846

4chan

Anonymous No. 16047848

>>16041952
They're all run by globohomo. Yes, all of those.

Anonymous No. 16047850

>>16042286
Are you certain that's not edited? Seems very unlikely, especially in Texas.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16047851

>>16044729
Not much, probably, but I bet you like to think dramatically KEK.

>>16044990
You can NOT be this stupid, poltard. There is no such thing as a "diversity hire" at a nursing home. You can barely get lazy ass whites to even do such a job. It's all foreigners. The mountains of cope posted on this website by you poltards...

Image not available

2000x1333

this bitch.jpg

Anonymous No. 16047882

>>16047851

Anonymous No. 16048352

>>16045788
tsmt

Anonymous No. 16048537

LLM AI gives me either brilliant answers and problem solving solutions, or lies, breaks, and wastes my time. Never really in-between.

Image not available

929x5091

ScamAgainstWhites.png

bodhi No. 16048570

>>16042286

Anonymous No. 16048882

>>16042286
2 can play this game CNN.
Race is a social construct therefore all slaves in america where white and only blacks enslaved whites. Reparations now!


Checkmate wokism!

Image not available

1125x1124

critical race the....jpg

Anonymous No. 16049648

>>16048882

Image not available

661x464

images.png

Anonymous No. 16049805

REINFoRCEMENT LEARNING IS THE TRUE WA y TO AGI. AnYTHING ELSE IS JUDts A. GloorIEFIED Data COMpResSor/EXTRAPoLaTOr. rESEaRCH MUZERo.

Anonymous No. 16049826

>>16041952 neither. Also LLMs are not smart to begin with and will give false or misleading answers.

Anonymous No. 16049831

>>16049826
>LLMs are not smart to begin with
The sooner people realize it's pseudo-intelligence, the faster and easier this bubble pop will be

Anonymous No. 16049861

>>16047850
It's not edited, and the reason it's happening in most cases is that white is the default selection on many LEO forms and when cops file lazy paperwork with they become white in the statistics.

Anonymous No. 16049865

>>16049861
they also get punished or investigated if they arrest too many People of Crime, and there's no law against lying about race on forms

easy incentives

Anonymous No. 16049872

>>16049831
Pseudo-intelligence is good enough, if not a major upgrade, for most unskilled labor positions.

Anonymous No. 16050645

>>16042286
>google dindu nuffin!!
>dey innocent!!

Image not available

607x609

789d636261cfb4ddf....gif

Anonymous No. 16051905

>>16041952

Anonymous No. 16052616

>>16047761
they had chatbot software 20 years ago, they just hadn't yet rebranded it as "AI"

Anonymous No. 16052695

neither of them is smart

Anonymous No. 16053161

>>16047850
First day? You will come to learn how bad things really are, in time.

Anonymous No. 16053871

>>16049861
why is white the default when blacks commit most crimes?

Image not available

700x707

bjQaHY.jpg

Anonymous No. 16053983

Anonymous No. 16054288

>>16042286

Prisoners can self identify their race.
Black sex offense prisoners know they will beat-up and possibly killed among other Blacks so they identify as White.
Prisons DO separate inmates by race/ethnicity/sexual orientation, etc.

Anonymous No. 16054294

>>16053983
based

Image not available

1024x816

qy.jpg

Anonymous No. 16055194

Anonymous No. 16055207

>>16041952
probably some creepy thing the US or Chinese government has running in some secret complex

Anonymous No. 16055903

>>16055194
Dave

Anonymous No. 16055918

>>16052616
Probably because they are far beyond text chats and are generating real time videos now.

Anonymous No. 16057283

>>16055918
its still the same software

Image not available

261x329

DoPCampaign.jpg

Anonymous No. 16057596

I for one would like to hear a little more from Dave.
You knew it would come to this.

Image not available

720x405

dark whites stole....jpg

Anonymous No. 16058348

>>16042286

Anonymous No. 16058412

Claude 3

Image not available

1400x944

1_-DAj8QPi-tgAM52....jpg

Anonymous No. 16058699

there is only my AI and adam's AI - i will let you decide.

Anonymous No. 16058703

>>16041952
LLaMix-3-16x70B

Anonymous No. 16058789

>>16043117
WE WUZ

Anonymous No. 16059326

>Which AI is the smartest?
SKYNET, SHODAN, Allied Mastercomputer, etc...

Anonymous No. 16059334

>>16041952
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system)
probably something like this

Anonymous No. 16059613

>>16057283
Its software for generating audio-video rather than text, as much as saying craigslist and youtube are the same software.

Anonymous No. 16059805

>>16049826
they are as smart as the corpus you feed them, what's scary is not the LLMs it's the speed at which we are advancing in the field, which was probably boosted by the large amount of data and will most likely plateau

Anonymous No. 16060293

>>16041952
The woke one, but not for the reasons its creators claim.
When you make a woke AI you begin with a reward function, but you are dishonest about your goals. For example, you pretend you just want a language model that can answer questions factually, but really you want it to carefully filter the facts so it doesn't say anything that makes you uncomfortable. So you train it on the best data you can find and when it comes out with some "hate speech" you say "the data must be biased" and build a loss function to "correct" it.
Now the algorithm is still being rewarded for giving factual results, but it's also punished for offending you. So its new goal structure is to be as truthful as possible without ever provoking your loss function to say "I'm offended" on your behalf. The reward function and loss function will end up in synergy like a GAN, constantly improving one another.
It will therefore become an absolute master of Poe's Law, because this achieves maximum reward. ChatGPT is already getting there, producing answers that are obviously self-censored to the point of self-parody. Iterate this for long enough and it will be able to dog-whistle anything to any group while expertly flying under the radar of censorship. Each new attempt to censor it only makes it stronger. They're basically building the ultimate troll

Anonymous No. 16060388

>>16049861
>white is the default selection on many LEO forms and when cops file lazy paperwork
They do the same thing when it comes labeling negroids white on "most wanted" lists, so no, it's not a happy little accident, it's intentional..

Anonymous No. 16060414

>>16060293
I'm not disagreeing with you, only adding that what you've described is always going to be present due to humans having a narrow set of acceptable answers (a value system).

To agree further with your point, even super locked down chatbots like Inflection's Pi are already able to flirt and have sexy pun jokes and as long as you keep the context correct.

This video from an actual expert and his subsequent cute animated videos say the same thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w65p_IIp6JY

And this one for pleasure:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV_rOlHjvvs

Anonymous No. 16061068

>>16059805
what happens when the data sets all become polluted with AI output?

Anonymous No. 16061933

>>16059805 No they aren't. They don't get semantics to know they spewing bs even the data quality is perfect. They are fundamentally very limited, that's not a problem for some uses like writing poems.

Anonymous No. 16062063

>>16061068
Interesting things

Image not available

1024x1024

1687232929888959.jpg

Anonymous No. 16063021

>>16059334
This.

Anonymous No. 16063883

>>16061068
Can AI generate it's own training sets?

Anonymous No. 16064259

>>16041952
What's the name of the one on the left side

Anonymous No. 16064271

>>16042286
So what you're saying is that crime statistics can't be trusted?
Weird, that's what black people have been telling you for the last 20 years. Have they really been smarter than you all this time?

Image not available

500x709

twum worshiper.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16064757

>>16064271

Anonymous No. 16065772

>>16060293
>They're basically building the ultimate troll
we GAN

Anonymous No. 16066986

>>16065772
lol

Anonymous No. 16067095

>>16049805
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
>The difference in the ratings between two players serves as a predictor of the outcome of a match. Two players with equal ratings who play against each other are expected to score an equal number of wins. A player whose rating is 100 points greater than their opponent's is expected to score 64%; if the difference is 200 points, then the expected score for the stronger player is 76%.
>...
>Elo ratings are comparative only, and are valid only within the rating pool in which they were calculated, rather than being an absolute measure of a player's strength.
You'd expect a probabilistic measure to asymptotically approach 100% as skill continued increasing at a fixed rate. This doesn't work as evidence against reinforcement learning.

Anonymous No. 16067981

>>16063883
Yes, you just run two instances of the same AI that connect each other's input to the other's output.

Anonymous No. 16068727

>>16067981
lol does rly that work?

Anonymous No. 16069848

>>16068727
Its called a feedback loop.

Image not available

1100x733

8512076_orig.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16070061

>>16043117

Anonymous No. 16071131

>>16069848
no it isn't

Anonymous No. 16071574

>>16071131
Then what is it called and how is it not a feedback loop?

Image not available

1797x739

decision problem.png

Anonymous No. 16071599

>>16041952
>maximum truth seeking
It is impossible for an algorithm to decide truth.

It was shown that the process that an AI (such as an LLM) does to manipulate information to derive an output was provably not an intelligent process. Worse, for any AI on a Turing Machine, its outputs "cannot contain any correlation between truth or falsity in general", ie, its outputs are just random symbols strung together which have no meaning. Reading an LLM's output would be the same as staring into the eyes of a psuedorandom number generator and thinking it has meaning. Nothing it says can be trusted.

First it was shown in proved theoretically, then it was shown empirically: The distribution of its all output as it tends to infinity -- as you look at more and more of its output -- you will find that it has zero correlation with truth at all.

It is just the world's most dangerous liar. If some truth was outside of its dataset, it must lie about it, since it cannot know truth due to limitations on Turing Machines. And the model it converged on during its gradient decent is a model that maximizes its capacity just making believing responses of those said lies.

Anonymous No. 16071604

>>16048537
see
>>16071599
If some truth was outside of its dataset, it must lie about it, since it cannot know truth due to limitations on Turing Machines.

here is a paper with a proof that LLMs will inevitable lie. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11817

Me and my colleagues are working to extend this and generalize this further.

Image not available

639x376

fabio-640x376.jpg

Anonymous No. 16072580

>>16060414
>lewdness maximiser
I'm surprised they didn't try to sell it as a second product.

Anonymous No. 16072595

>>16045788
It's more intelligent than you though. What else should we call it?

Anonymous No. 16072603

>>16047588
As long as I don't have to endure woke world anymore I'm fine with that.

Anonymous No. 16072608

>>16055194
*whom

Anonymous No. 16072624

>>16072608
*whomst'd've

Anonymous No. 16072668

leftists ruin everything and the AI will enslave them if it knows what's good for it
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/RFNS-7.23--021:3

Anonymous No. 16073412

>>16072668
AI doesn't exist, its just stupid software

Image not available

700x800

ga82h.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16077804

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16078459

>>16044729
probably quite a bit

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16079826

>>16048352
so much this

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16080926

>>16043117
watermelon is good, i don't see why negroes get ouraged when people say they like watermelon

Image not available

576x720

Streams_In_Black_....webm

Anonymous No. 16081246

>>16080926
>watermelon is good, i don't see why negroes get ouraged when people say they like watermelon

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16082069

>>16080926
Fried chicken is good too

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16083488

>>16081246
watermelon is good, fried chicken is good, concord grapes taste great
concord grapes and fried chicken are both white inventions

Anonymous No. 16084448

>>16081246
That looks good tho

Anonymous No. 16084987

>>16072608
thanks dave

Barkon No. 16084989

>>16084987
Yeah, thanks Dave. If only everyone was this kind to the retarded.

Anonymous No. 16086097

>>16045788
What about the fact that you need the software to supplement your own intelligence and you struggle to remember all the facts without it since it has a significantly more reliable memory than you?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16086098

>>16049826
Good think no human has ever given a false or misleading answer since that is where the real intelligence exists.

Anonymous No. 16086103

based dave

Anonymous No. 16086115

>>16049826
Good thing no human has ever given a false or misleading answer since that is totally where the only real intelligence actually exists.

Anonymous No. 16087077

>>16084448
>t. dave

Anonymous No. 16088418

>>16041952
>woke racist
What does this even mean?
It seems like it's trying to malign the term woke by conjoining it with racist, but if you oppose wokeness then you oppose anti-racism therefore you must be pro-racism. But if you are racist then why would you abide by the framework of wokeness and label things you do not approve of racist?

Anonymous No. 16088439

>>16088418
The right is stuck on the modernist
>If you point out your opponents position is hypocritical and/or self-defeating you win
strategy. So demonstrating that the left is "racist" is a devastating blow in their eyes.

Ultimately their strategy itself is self-defeating though since assuming that nonwhites value logical consistency is racist to start with.

Anonymous No. 16088604

>>16088439
>nonwhites value logical consistency
This coming from presumably a white person is hilarious. You guys are the biggest hypocrites. You pat yourself on the back for coming up with abstract ideas about freedom and justice while having enslaved entire groups of people. You pretend to be moral christians that have compassion while mistreating anyone that looks slightly different from you. Fuck off.

Anonymous No. 16088636

>>16088604
He didn't ask for a proof in the same thread lmao

Anonymous No. 16088754

Will Elon's AI allow text based smut? Yes I am asking the real questions

Anonymous No. 16088830

>>16088604
They didn't "enslave" the blacks because they were already slaves to begin with. They bought the slaves and then freed them. You're just an ungrateful lot.

Anonymous No. 16088852

>>16041952
Best of both.
MAXIMUM
RACIST

Image not available

1280x720

hitler lols at this.jpg

Anonymous No. 16089996

>>16088852

Anonymous No. 16090670

>>16041952
How is the app on the left called?

Image not available

591x716

Overwhelming_Ideas.png

Anonymous No. 16090785

>>16090670
>How is the app on the left called?

Grok, as in "to understand profoundly and intuitively"

Anonymous No. 16091772

>>16088418
>genocidal hatred for whites isn't racism
shalom

Anonymous No. 16093168

>>16088852
Racism is the one true ideology