Image not available

1177x189

1687771474348892.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16058076

Like having a room full of professors that know every single math book between them and can explain any problem and give an example instantly.
When did you realize AI has already killed university education?

Anonymous No. 16058163

>>16058076
>so, what qualifications do you have?
>uh .. I googled.
>you're hired!
welcome to the schizo mind of OP

Anonymous No. 16058210

>>16058076
Anon they already made the AI retarded using DEI

Anonymous No. 16058608

>>16058076
AI isn't any good for math and physics (yet). It's good at sounding like it knows what it is talking about and/or summarizing Wikipedia articles on math and physics, and that's about it.

Anonymous No. 16059021

>>16058608
>>16058163
t. seething professors

Anonymous No. 16059035

Ok let's test it out, ask it to prove that sqrt(2) is irrational
this is a very common beginner proof
Then ask it this, a higher level undergraduate proof: suppose I have a function with domain [0,1] defined as 0 if x is rational and x if x is irrational, prove this is not riemann integrable using darboux sums

Anonymous No. 16059053

>>16059035
Will your college professor do your homework for you?

Anonymous No. 16059055

>>16059053
No but the failed graduate student will

Anonymous No. 16059059

>>16059055
It can explain how the proof would work and give you all the tips a professor would. It can copy the proof from somewhere and explain every detail which is something a professor wouldn't. But the point is you don't need an appointment.

Anonymous No. 16059092

If an LLM can replace your prof, maybe you should reconsider the seriousness of your program

Anonymous No. 16059145

>>16059092
Sorry about your job.

Anonymous No. 16059147

>>16058076
You mean like the internet? Or maybe a library?

Anonymous No. 16059148

>>16059035
>Then ask it this, a higher level undergraduate proof: suppose I have a function with domain [0,1] defined as 0 if x is rational and x if x is irrational, prove this is not riemann integrable using darboux sums
the integral is equal to 1 because it is zero on a set of measure 0

Anonymous No. 16059154

>>16059147
Yeah but much faster with better explanations.

Image not available

978x166

m.png

Anonymous No. 16059817

>>16059021
have your precious AI solve this, I'll wait

Anonymous No. 16059822

>>16059817
do you honestly think OP knows how to typeset that?

Anonymous No. 16059826

>>16059148
guess the AI failed

Anonymous No. 16059828

>>16059148
kek

Anonymous No. 16059832

>>16059826
Can't you upload pictures when talking to the AI?

Image not available

234x255

1688784898109719.gif

Anonymous No. 16059890

>>16058163
>implying the interviewer didnt use AI to generate his questions
>implying I didn't use AI to generate answers
>implying the AI wouldn't hire itself

Anonymous No. 16059972

>>16059822
You can use AI for that.

Anonymous No. 16059973

>>16059972
do it

Anonymous No. 16061076

>>16059817
Lol op never responded to this

Anonymous No. 16061158

>>16058608
It'll have a great career as a science/history youtuber.