🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:53:45 UTC No. 16059222
Hello, /sci/, No dark matter guy here again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rY
I gave a presentation to some professors and a small audience of students from around the world recently. I'd like to thank Syracuse University for allowing me to present and I hope to have another meeting soon. I'm working behind the scenes for that and let's just say that I am trying to get a talk with a real professional on the subject.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:56:33 UTC No. 16059226
Seminar begins at 1:45.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:56:51 UTC No. 16059227
you sure do seem to like talking about yourself on social media
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:57:01 UTC No. 16059228
buy an ad
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 03:58:48 UTC No. 16059231
>>16059228
>>16059227
I like coming here to post about progress on my theory. You can't advertise that.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:00:37 UTC No. 16059234
>dude I know everything about the entire universe!!!
>hurrrrrr my IQ is sooo big!!!
whats it like having narcissistic personality disorder and delusions of grandiosity?
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:12:04 UTC No. 16059256
>>16059231
just jerk off in front of the mirror, it's much more satisfying
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:19:07 UTC No. 16059270
>16059234
This obsessed /his/nigger spams on /sci/ nonstop. He is completely deranged and trying to shit up the board due to some personal vendetta.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:21:11 UTC No. 16059273
>>16059234
If I was that smart I wouldn't be here.
>>16059256
I'm not that pretty.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 22:59:19 UTC No. 16060489
>>16059270
Let's all get along.
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:38:34 UTC No. 16060550
let the thread die, bro
i feel second hand embarrassment
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:49:31 UTC No. 16061234
>>16060550
Review the theory. Tell me what you think. Don't be a dick.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:53:49 UTC No. 16061239
>>16061234
my theory is that you're massively desperate for attention but nobody is interested in you, so you keep on bumping your unwanted uninteresting content from page 10 over and over again. that seems to explain only 3 IPs having posted in the thread so far
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:55:38 UTC No. 16061243
>>16061239
But if none of them are talking about the idea itself, then what's really the problem here except ignorance enough to enter the thread and leave a post, but not engage with the topic?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:05:53 UTC No. 16061406
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/69918
>Thought you might like to know.
>no replies
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/69972
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/70206
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/70461
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/71423
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/71684
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/72477
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/72929
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/73657
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/74769
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/76074
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/77588
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/79583
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/80353
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/81282
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/81726
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/82663
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/82842
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/84817
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/84944
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/85692
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/89681
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/91228
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/92084
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/93037
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/93881
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/94313
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/96078
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/96290
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/98409
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/15998
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/16059
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:25:39 UTC No. 16061426
>>16061406
Good. They're all archived. Impressive that you found so many.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:28:58 UTC No. 16061434
>>16061243
I've had plenty of discussions on the subject here. About the only objection I ever hear is "You're not using the correct coordinate system." Which is stupid, because I'm just submitting the Einstein-Rosen coordinates. Nothing wrong with those, and besides my argument is based in Null geodesics which are coordinate independent.