Image not available

800x418

5a4bdbd41cbadd4b0....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16060298

NO. FUCKING. WAY.

Anonymous No. 16060308

>>16060298
thought it was some cool pattern that takes some thinking to figure out, its just f(a,b) = a*b + a
f(8,11) = 8*11 + 8 = 96

Anonymous No. 16060312

>>16060298
new math just dropped

Anonymous No. 16060314

>1+4=5
yes
>2+5=12
wrong
>3+6=21
wrong
>8+11=?
19
and nothing else you niggers
dont @ me

Anonymous No. 16060330

>>16060308
It can also be
f(a,b) = a*(4+a)
or an infinite amount of other formulas.

Anonymous No. 16060334

>>16060330
but my function is obviously the one that the creator of that image meant.

Anonymous No. 16060343

>>16060330
>or an infinite amount of other formulas.
Proof?

Anonymous No. 16060359

>>16060343
Development of this proof is left as an exercise for the reader. It should be developed alongside the proof that you're not a retarded baiter.

Anonymous No. 16060369

Forty?

Anonymous No. 16060379

>>16060298
1 + 4 = 5
2 + 5 = 7 + 5 = 12
3 + 6 = 9 + 12 = 21
8 + 11 = 19 + 21 = 40

Anonymous No. 16060445

>>16060298
19 is a crazy number. Just crazy.

Image not available

224x254

1709728993572149.jpg

Anonymous No. 16060527

>>16060298
a + b is actually a(b+1)

1 * (4 + 1) = 5
2 * (5+1) = 12
3 * (6 + 1) = 21
8 * (11+1) = 96

you can't refute this

Anonymous No. 16060568

>>16060298
[math]x_{1}+x_{4}-x_{5}=0[/math]
[math]x_{2}+x_{5}-x_{0}=0[/math]
[math]x_{3}+x_{6}-x_{7}=0[/math]
[math]x_{8}+x_{9}=?[/math]
>ten variables
>three equations
>the problem asks about an expresion that is clearly "linearly independent" from the previous three

El Arcón No. 16060571

>>16060568
yeah

Anonymous No. 16060585

>>16060298
40

5+5+2=12
12+3+6=21
21+8+11=40

Anonymous No. 16061200

52

Anonymous No. 16061254

>>16060298
2 + 5 is 7

Image not available

936x720

number-38540_960_....png

Anonymous No. 16061291

>>16060298

Anonymous No. 16061302

>>16060298
201

Image not available

800x481

1709755978237812.jpg

Anonymous No. 16061692

>>16060298

Image not available

600x765

1705666985996029.png

Anonymous No. 16061828

>>16060298
are you all retarded? its literally the result + the previous result
8+11 = 32

Anonymous No. 16061850

>>16060298
1 + 4(x1) = 5
2 + 5 (x2) = 12
3 + 6 (x3) = 21
4 + 7 (x4) = 32
5 + 8 (x5) = 45
6 + 9 (x6) = 60
7 + 10 (x7) = 77
8 + 11 (x8) = 96
yuo = fagot
https://pastebin.com/kcPLQwGh

Anonymous No. 16061861

>>16060298
2+5 is 7

Anonymous No. 16061897

>>16060308
fpbp
>>16060527
>>16061850
ok

Anonymous No. 16062988

>>16060308
why does the operator plus signify simply an addition in your made up wacky function but when I look at the question it is something else entirely, if you use plus again in your function then it should be recursive, this is not fair, it doesn't make any sense

Anonymous No. 16063501

>>16062988
You should use a donut operator between those, yes, but it's intended as a fun puzzle and if regular people see a placeholder operator they will go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVWeRnStdSA

On the other hand, it's profitable if math autists also realize the addition symbol is indeed arbitrary and does not inherently denote addition. This is trivially true as math symbols are already overloaded and denote quite different things within different subdisciplines.

Anonymous No. 16063572

>>16063501
Alternatively those are not numbers, those are niggbers, and to add two niggbers you do ab + a.

Anonymous No. 16063579

>>16060585
Was thinking the same

Anonymous No. 16063715

>>16060298
1+ 4 = 5 (base 6)
2 + 5 = 12 (base 5)
3 + 6 = 21 (base 4)
8 + 11 = undefined (base -1 is undefined)
9 + 12 = 10101 (base -2)