🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 01:41:06 UTC No. 16060689
>the literature review is relaxing
>the experiments are easy to implement
>the data is panning out
>the paper practically writes itself
We're all going to make it.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 01:58:15 UTC No. 16060706
I'm 43 and I don't even have a high school degree
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:14:15 UTC No. 16060739
>>16060689
you sure do seem to like talking about yourself on social media
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 23:02:28 UTC No. 16061981
>>16060706
same.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:28:48 UTC No. 16063135
>>16060689
>all that happens
>publisher still rejects it because one of your peer reviewers found some bullshit to nitpick over
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:43:27 UTC No. 16063160
>>16063135
>reviewers bitch about how methods are inadequate to prove the conclusion because it contradicts their intuition
>once methods are made more convincing, next set of reviewers 180 to complaining that there's no novelty and the results are obvious
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:47:43 UTC No. 16063167
>>16063135
>reviewer complains about shortcut in methods that has no consequence on results or conclusion
>"it isn't realistic"
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:57:14 UTC No. 16063183
>reviewer doesn't understand the paper whatsoever, despite using well-established, uncontroversial methods and clearly explaining them, and writes a bunch of completely irrelevant criticisms based on his headcanon
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:18:11 UTC No. 16063320
>>16063183
>reviewer writes, "the methods section merely references other papers in the field with the same or similar methods instead of justifying the choice of methods"
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:20:52 UTC No. 16063326
>>16063320
This, but they also say
>the paper should be shortened
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:49:21 UTC No. 16063372
>>16060689
>wrote some gay papers
>wrote a shitty thesis
>immediately got the fuck out
You too can follow in my footsteps.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:12:44 UTC No. 16063967
>>16063372
Gay papers on the way.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:28:50 UTC No. 16063997
>>16063967
Congrats.
I occasionally check my papers on Google Scholar. The first one has been cited like ten times, but never in a way that makes me think they actually read it. The second one was only ever cited in my own thesis.
Basically, it was all a scam.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:50:52 UTC No. 16064052
>>16063997
Don't think like that. You killed some easy problems and forced later graduate students to be more ambitious or creative than they they thought they could get away with. That's praiseworthy.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:27:01 UTC No. 16064147
>>16063135
>use similar method for doing something as an analogy for a method you're using to do something else
>"but this isn't a situation where (similar method) can be used!"
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 02:54:36 UTC No. 16064187
>>16060689
>one chance at a PHD
>roll an Indian advisor
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 04:35:04 UTC No. 16064349
>>16064147
>imagine being so fat you look at computers and see food