🧵 >confuses bits and bytes
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:46:51 UTC No. 16061510
>knows this and says they are the same anyway
Why is she so fucking stupid?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:57:37 UTC No. 16061520
who cares. the whole metrics of bits is as awful as the imperial system with a mix of various bases and prefixes. you get her statement which is important.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:01:10 UTC No. 16061525
>>16061520
>one unit is literally 1/8th the size of the other
>who cares
Retard detected
Her statement is fucking wrong
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:07:20 UTC No. 16061532
>>16061510
You are retarded.
The paper claimed the technique can potentially store exabits of memory.
Even a single exabit is 125 petabytes.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:10:59 UTC No. 16061535
>>16061510
you can store at least one human there. if not more.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:13:16 UTC No. 16061538
>>16061525
Not that guy, but I reiterate that you are retarded.
The paper is about a technique to improve storage density by over six orders of magnitude.
The conversion from bits to bytes represents less than a single order of magnitude.
You are an autist who says "ACKCHUALLY the price is $39.95, not $40" when discussing the your Ritalin copay.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:28:01 UTC No. 16061554
>>16061510
And how fast does it read and write?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:32:50 UTC No. 16061563
uses uv-c or what?
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:33:27 UTC No. 16061564
>>16061538
Sabine...... you made a mistake. It's ok.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 18:30:08 UTC No. 16061630
>>16061510
obvious bug-person, why would you listen to anything it says
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:10:33 UTC No. 16061663
>>16061510
it's time to buy an ad, Sabine. You've posted every one of your videos here for months
bodhi at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:55:45 UTC No. 16061716
>>16061520
It is the way it is because it is binary moron, you are fucking stupid
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:09:53 UTC No. 16061808
>>16061510
Divide a petabyte by 8 and... it's still fucking huge
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:15:26 UTC No. 16061825
sloppy wet sabine mommy pusy
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:37:29 UTC No. 16061865
>>16061825
BASED
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:42:53 UTC No. 16061880
>>16061538
>$39.95
Anon the price would be $5.00 not $40.00 and that's still a big difference even if it's like the difference between the two prices in Vietnamese Dongs instead of USD.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:47:33 UTC No. 16061883
What bothers me is that this route was pursued decades ago and the guy unceremoniously died and the work was "lost".
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 21:49:44 UTC No. 16061885
>>16061630
It looks like she had cosmetic surgeries in her youth which makes her look asian now.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 23:37:28 UTC No. 16062039
>>16061510
I thought she did as well, but she didn't.
She said "bits are not bytes".
As in what they have now is not that great but in the paper that promised many times order of magnitude (bit is just 1/8 of byte) possible improvements.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 23:49:49 UTC No. 16062044
>>16061510
the fuck is that phenotype
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:30:53 UTC No. 16062231
>>16061520
It's solely in base 2 you dense retard
you'd probably be one of those nigga's to say 2+2=5 because of advance calculus schizophrenia.
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 03:52:39 UTC No. 16062263
>>16061510
>Why is she so fucking stupid?
Is she? While it might a jarring mistake, it's rather attribute related to yt channels that pack things into 8 minute long content, going against trend of 45 min. rants/drooling over specific topic
Cult of Passion at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 05:41:08 UTC No. 16062377
>>16061520
lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:28:10 UTC No. 16062473
>>16061716
>>16062231
stupid software "engineers" i guess.
where is the base 2 in the si units? but wait, we can randomly divide by 8 to get a new unit. or we take 1024 as base for a completely new prefix to enhance the confusion. also, we are going to use everything interchangably.
bodhi at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:30:22 UTC No. 16062478
>>16062473
I cant tell if you are trolling or actually this retarded. You have no idea how binary systems work do you?
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:41:35 UTC No. 16062491
>>16062478
okay, enlighten me why this is a consistent system.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:42:10 UTC No. 16064029
>>16061510
Use the binary prefixes: kibi, mebi, gibi etc.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:46:22 UTC No. 16064040
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:48:08 UTC No. 16064045
>>16062491
1 byte consists of 8 bits. A bit is either an 1 or a 0.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 03:22:44 UTC No. 16064237
>>16062039
scientists in the field of devices talk about bits because that's what you have to store in order to store bytes
as you said and as was said here >>16061538 no one cares if you divide the storage by 8 after you multiplied it by 1,000,000
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 16:58:23 UTC No. 16065157
Sabine destroying Stringgers again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRz
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 17:05:13 UTC No. 16065161
>>16061538
Kek. This sounds strangely specific.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 17:38:54 UTC No. 16065203
>>16061808
640K should be enough for anybody
t. not Bill Gates but a common line of thought at the time
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 18:31:40 UTC No. 16065267
>>16061808
>>16061510
for anyone wondering
exabytes of memeory
read write speed of a few kilobytes
its physically engraving the bits INSIDE super hard glass using lasers like a bubble gram
even if it were at modern hard disk speeds it would take decades to fully encode, and would also not be able to change the data
the main use it to densely store data for millennia where other physical media would fail
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:07:29 UTC No. 16065314
>>16061510
her videos have really taken a nose dive in quality in the past 3 months
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:07:58 UTC No. 16065317
>>16065267
What if I break the glass with a hammer though
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:08:08 UTC No. 16065318
>>16061510
>>16061520
>>16061538
It's indeed autistic to care if she was off by 8, like thinking she's crap because she missed dotting an i or crossing a t. That's not a big deal and it's retarded to care about, just pedantic nitpicking.
What made me think she's not so great is when I was seeing what she had to say about one of the recent papers about the "second law of infodynamics" around 1:30 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ing
She glosses over it by saying "it doesn't say anything new that isn't already true about the second law of thermodynamics" but seems to miss the big point that the theory says information entropy naturally decreases instead of increases for an entire system, the exact opposite of physical entropy.
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/articl
The author (Vopson) combines information entropy with physical entropy to define a new total entropy of a system. The "implies simulation theory" looks like headline grabbing crap, but Vopson has a couple other papers where he applies the theory and shows how it explains things like why symmetries in shapes and life are common throughout nature (more symmetrical objects have less possible configurations / less information entropy), and this will apply to even closed systems. He says this still won't violate the second law about total entropy, because while information entropy will decrease the physical entropy of the system will increase more.
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:26:51 UTC No. 16065347
>>16065317
thats not the point, books will rot, ssds will lose memory without power, vhs tapes will lose their magnetism, stone tablets cant store much information and are very heavy to carry around
glass is hardy and will not degrade much on its own