Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:41:30 UTC No. 16063259

I don't, per se, have the style sense of mutant atomic. I supposed that the mutants of such a place are good to use as clothes (a persona on top of a persona). I can theorize deeply on the matter. I also don't have knowledge of everything from that specific perspective, which may be different entirely; I am unwise still by knowing everything from this angle. Perhaps it's a fallacy to suggest that this angle is ever knowledge of everything.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:44:05 UTC No. 16063262

I don't think knowing everything is a curse on the world, but to know everything requires that you have to have been cursed.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:46:48 UTC No. 16063264

There's some promise in the genuity at moving forward to the end state for a modality that allows the perfection of the past for better moving onward to the future.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:49:09 UTC No. 16063267

>>16063251
A point can expand in 360 degrees. A ball has 360 degrees. There are perpetual possible sub-degrees. Hence, all knowledge is located somewhere in the abstraction of these two shapes.

The Monad.

https://youtu.be/PB9Mi_hf7og

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 19:59:52 UTC No. 16063390

>>16063251
Suppose you knew everything. Then you would know exactly what it’s like to be me. But part of being me is not knowing everything. So to know what it’s like to be me would require that you not know everything, thus someone who knows everything can’t know what it’s like to be me and hence can’t know everything.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:26:00 UTC No. 16063589

>>16063251
you'll never know everything. For example, you'll never know I'm masturbating right now while I'm typing this

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:30:27 UTC No. 16063601

>>16063390
(You) are the product of your experiences, which are unique to you. The same your identical twin is different to you because of its set of experiences and unique conditions. So you are unique and also nobody else can even know what it's like to be precisely you, that's yours only, now and forever.

Monadas !lyWkAM5ERA at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 04:46:13 UTC No. 16064379

>>16063267
An all knowing monad would just be a monon (prove me wrong).

>>16063589
solvitur fellatando

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:42:18 UTC No. 16064659

>>16063251
You can't know everything unless you can prove everything.
The Godel incompleteness theorem therefore applies and proves that you can't know everything.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:28:35 UTC No. 16065529

>>16064379
Monads at point of separation would contain all possible monons. You cannot escape Buddha's palm. An all mighty know it all, might as well be an all small moron.

Chaos. Order. Life, Death. Evil, Good. Opposites are bound to their equal, yet liberated only in their agreement.

Soon.

Ascension.

https://youtu.be/DJ__2mWaMIY

Garrote at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:30:55 UTC No. 16065533

You can't know if there's still something that you don't know. You just wouldn't know that you don't know it.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:38:19 UTC No. 16065541

>>16065533
this can be both a blessing or a curse

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:52:34 UTC No. 16065566

>>16063390
/thread

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:01:04 UTC No. 16065576

>>16063251
>or is there some sort of trick in that logic?
I'd imagine the trick to this (if there is a trick) would be something like Library of Babel

https://libraryofbabel.info/

This library has every known text written by man, but also every unknown text, and every text yet to be written, as well as an infinite number of incomprehensible gibberish texts. Not "everything" there is useful or relevant. If you knew EVERYTHING then you'd also know an infinite amount of irrelevant and incomprehensible junk too. Makes me wonder if god were omniscient if they'd ever get overwhelmed by the sheer amount of information and after an near infinite amount of time might decide to take a break from it all and experience a more focused and small view of the universe by being human for a very very brief period of time. I guess a single lifespan is brief from a gods perspective that is.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:16:28 UTC No. 16065587

This just came to me that I think is pretty clever.

If you know everything, can you know what it is like to NOT everything?
This is very similar to "Does the set of all sets contain itself?"

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:34:03 UTC No. 16065600

>>16065587
yeah but it's implied you know how it's like to not know everything, provided you were not born/created with all info. tho understanding/remembering implies storage, which makes it obvious you cannot KNOW everything.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:35:38 UTC No. 16065602

>>16065600
>yeah but it's implied you know how it's like to not know everything
as in you must know that before you reach the point of knowing everything.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:54:32 UTC No. 16065621

>>16065587
>If you know everything
You always know everything but everything expands.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:32:29 UTC No. 16065786

>>16065587
>can you know what it is like to NOT everything?
Why couldn't you? You can know what it's like to be outside while you're inside